一种页岩气井连通性评价的新型示踪剂应用研究

申宝剑; 潘安阳; 张俊; 卢龙飞; 钱门辉; 陆双龙; 杜明亮

doi:10.11781/sysydz202105855

一种页岩气井连通性评价的新型示踪剂应用研究

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105855

申宝剑^{1, 2, 3,},
潘安阳^{1, 2, 3},
张俊⁴,
卢龙飞^{1, 2, 3},
钱门辉^{1, 2, 3},
陆双龙⁵,
杜明亮⁵

1.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
中国石化页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
中国石化科技部, 北京 100728
5.
江南大学化学与材料工程学院, 江苏无锡 214122

基金项目:

中国石化科技部项目 P20059-8

详细信息

作者简介:
申宝剑(1978-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 从事非常规页岩油气地质评价研究。E-mail: shenbj.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE311
计量
- 文章访问数: 538
- HTML全文浏览量: 194
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-05-13
- 修回日期: 2021-08-31
- 刊出日期: 2021-09-28

Evaluating the connectivity of shale gas wells by new rare element tracers

SHEN Baojian^{1, 2, 3
,},
PAN Anyang^{1, 2, 3},
ZHANG Jun⁴,
LU Longfei^{1, 2, 3},
QIAN Menhui^{1, 2, 3},
LU Shuanglong⁵,
DU Mingliang⁵

1.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
Science and Technology Department of SINOPEC, Beijing 100728, China
5.
School of Chemical and Material Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China

摘要

摘要: 选取了3种在地层和压裂液中含量低、环保、稳定的稀土元素Pr、Yb、Sm与乙二胺四乙酸和吡啶二羧酸形成络合物，然后将其作为示踪剂应用于页岩气井连通性评价。在中国石化涪陵页岩气田焦页66号扩平台井组的中部气层两口井（焦页66-Z1HF和焦页66-Z2HF）中注入微量元素示踪剂，通过监测注入示踪剂井及其邻井返排液中是否有微量元素示踪剂来评估焦页66号扩平台压后连通性，进而探讨涪陵页岩气田下部、中部、上部气层立体开发的可行性。返排液监测结果显示，焦页66-Z1HF井偶见高含量Sm元素示踪剂（焦页66-Z2HF井注入剂），表明两口中部气层井间可能存在连通；下部气层监测井未见Pr，Yb，Sm浓度异常，说明其与中部气层未发生连通；上部气层监测井焦页5-S2井和焦页5-S3井返排液混样中监测到了高浓度Sm元素示踪剂，表明其与中部气层存在连通。研究初步验证了微量元素示踪技术是一项简单、有效的页岩气井连通性评价的示踪技术，可以方便、高效地判断页岩气井的井间连通情况，具有广阔的应用前景。
- 微量元素 /
- 示踪剂 /
- 页岩气井 /
- 连通性
Abstract: Three types of rare earth elements, Pr, Yb and Sm, in shale gas well and fracturing fluid, which showed a low content and are environmentally friendly and chemically stable, formed complexes with ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and di-picolinic acid, both of which were applied as tracers in the determination of the connectivity of shale gas wells. A case study was made in two shale gas wells (Jiaoye 66-Z1HF and Jiaoye 66-Z2HF) of the middle gas reservoir in the Jiaoye No. 66 extended platform well group in the Fuling shale gas field of SINOPEC. We first injected rare element tracer into the wells, and then evaluated the connectivity of the Jiaoye No. 66 extended platform after fracuring by monitoring whether there was rare element tracer in the tracer-injected wells and the flow-back fluid from adjacent wells, and finally discussed the feasibility of three-dimensional development of the lower, middle and upper gas layers of the Fuling shale gas field. The results of flow-back fluid monitoring showed that a high content of Sm tracer, which had been injected into well Jiaoye 66-Z2HF, was occasionally found in well Jiaoye 66-Z1HF, indicating that there might be a connection between the middle gas layers of the two wells. There is no abnormal Pr, Yb or Sm concentrations in the monitoring wells of the lower gas layers, indicating that they were not connected with the central gas layers. A high concentration of Sm tracer was detected in the mixed back-flow fluid samples of wells Jiaoye 5-S2 and Jiaoye 5-S3 in the upper gas layer, indicating that they were connected to the central gas layers. The present investigation has verified that rare element tracer technology is a facile and effective method for the connection determination between shale gas wells and has broad application prospects.
- rare elements /
- tracer /
- shale gas well /
- connectivity

HTML全文

图 1 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页66-Z1HF、焦页66-Z2HF井与邻井空间关系示意

Figure 1. Spatial relationship among wells Jiaoye 66-Z1HF, Jiaoye 66-Z2HF and their neighboring wells, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 重庆涪陵页岩气田监测井压裂液和返排液Pr和Yb浓度基值

Figure 2. Base values of Pr and Yb tracer concentration in fracturing and flowback fluid from monitoring wells, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 重庆涪陵页岩气田监测井压裂液和返排液Sm浓度基值

Figure 3. Base values of Sm tracer concentration in fracturing and flowback fluid from monitoring wells, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页6-1HF井返排液样品Pr、Yb、Sm浓度分布

Figure 4. Concentrations of Pr, Yb and Sm tracers in flowback fluid from well Jiaoye 6-1HF, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页12-4HF井返排液样品Pr、Yb、Sm浓度分布

Figure 5. Concentrations of Pr, Yb and Sm tracers in flowback fluid from well Jiaoye 12-4HF, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页5-S2-S3(合)返排液样品Pr、Yb、Sm浓度分布

Figure 6. Concentrations of Pr, Yb and Sm tracers in flowback fluid from well Jiaoye 5-S2-S3 (mixed), Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页66-Z1-3(合)返排液样品Pr、Yb、Sm浓度分布

Figure 7. Concentrations of Pr, Yb and Sm tracers in flowback fluid from well Jiaoye 66-Z1-3 (mixed), Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页66-Z2-4(合)返排液样品Pr、Yb、Sm浓度分布

Figure 8. Concentrations of Pr, Yb and Sm tracers in flowback fluid from well Jiaoye 66-Z2-4 (mixed), Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页66-3-4(合)返排液样品Pr，Yb，Sm浓度分布

Figure 9. Concentrations of Pr, Yb and Sm tracers in flowback fluid from well Jiaoye 66-3-4 (mixed), Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页66-Z1HF井和焦页66-Z2HF井与邻井空间距离

Table 1. Distance between wells Jiaoye 66-Z1HF and Jiaoye 66-Z2HF and their neighboring wells, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

注入井	空间位置	取样监测井	井距/m
焦页 66-Z1HF	上部气层	焦页5-S3HF	443
	上部气层	焦页5-S2HF	722
	中部气层	焦页66-Z2HF	304
	下部气层	焦页66-3HF	153
		焦页66-4HF	501
		焦页12-4HF	170
		焦页5-2HF	775
		焦页6-1HF	781
焦页 66-Z2HF	上部气层	焦页5-S3HF	119
	上部气层	焦页5-S2HF	471
	中部气层	焦页66-Z1HF	304
	下部气层	焦页66-3HF	151
		焦页66-4HF	201
		焦页12-4HF	474
		焦页5-2HF	471
		焦页6-1HF	477

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 重庆涪陵页岩气田焦页66-Z1HF井和焦页66-Z2HF井微量示踪剂注入段号及用量

Table 2. Rare element tracers used in wells Jiaoye 66-Z1HF and Jiaoye 66-Z2HF, Fuling shale gas field, Chongqing

井号	焦页66-Z1HF				焦页66-Z2HF
注入段号	2	9	17	24	2	7	12	18	25
起始井深/m	4 481	3 969	3 463	3 022	4 321	4 021	3 661	3 301	2 885
终止井深/m	4 523	4 033	3 526	3 085	4 354	4 081	3 721	3 361	2 945
穿行层位	⑤下	④上	⑤下	⑤下	⑤下	⑤下	④上	⑤下	⑤上
示踪剂类型	AL	AL	BL	BL	CL	CL	CL	CL	CL
用量/m³	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.3	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5
实际浓度/(mg·L^-1)	9.31	11.66	17.64	21.70	28.46	26.16	28.66	29.54	31.14
注：A，B，C分别代表Pr，Yb，Sm；L代表乙二胺四乙酸+吡啶二羧酸。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	马云, 池晓明, 黄东安, 等. 用于多段压裂的微量物质示踪剂与压裂液的配伍性研究[J]. 精细石油化工, 2016, 33(2): 50-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXSY201602013.htm MA Yun, CHI Xiaoming, HUANG Dongan, et al. Compatibility for trace substances of multi-stage fracturing and fracturing fluid[J]. Peciality Petrochemicals, 2016, 33(2): 50-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXSY201602013.htm
[2]	张宏. 微量物质井间示踪剂在长庆油田的应用[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2017. ZHANG Hong. Application of microsubstance tracer in Changqing Oilfiled[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2017.
[3]	陈岩, 黄佳. 井间示踪剂技术在海上油田的研究与探索[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2021, 47(7): 11-12, 16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGTX202107007.htm CHEN Yan, HUANG Jia. Research and exploration of inter-well tracer technology in offshore oilfield[J]. Chemical Engineering Design Communications, 2021, 47(7): 11-12, 16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGTX202107007.htm
[4]	徐玉霞, 沈明. 井间示踪剂监测技术在海上注水油田中的应用[J]. 能源化工, 2020, 41(4): 51-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXGJ202004015.htm XU Yuxia, SHEN Ming. Application of tracer monitoring technology in offshore oilfields with water-flooding[J]. Energy Chemical Industry, 2020, 41(4): 51-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXGJ202004015.htm
[5]	罗娜, 孙超, 张君, 等. 示踪剂监测技术在青海油田的应用[J]. 石化技术, 2020, 27(1): 341-342. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJS202001216.htm LUO Na, SUN Chao, ZHANG Jun, et al. Application of tracer monitoring technology in qinghai oilfield[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2020, 27(1): 341-342. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJS202001216.htm
[6]	张新宝, 李留仁. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏井间连通性的示踪剂监测: 以塔河油田T402注采井组为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(6): 55-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201906010.htm ZHANG Xinbao, LI Liuren. Tracer monitoring of inter-well connectivity in fracture-vuggy carbonate reservoir: a case study of T402 injection-production well group in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 34(6): 55-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201906010.htm
[7]	李刚, 张影. 井间示踪剂监测技术在三类薄差储层压裂改造中的应用[J]. 采油工程, 2019(02): 32-37, 84. LI Gang, ZHANG Ying. Application of interwell tracer monitoring technology in fracturing stimulation for third type of thin and poor reservoirs[J]. Oil Production Engineering, 2019(2): 32-37, 84.
[8]	梁顺, 彭茜, 李旖旎, 等. 水平井分段压裂示踪剂监测技术应用研究[J]. 能源化工, 2017, 38(04): 32-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXGJ201704010.htm LIANG Shun, PENG Qian, LI Yini, et al. Study on application of tracer monitoring technology in horizontal well staged fracturing[J]. Energy Chemical Industry, 2017, 38(4): 32-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXGJ201704010.htm
[9]	周晶晶, 黄春华, 沈斌, 等. 新型水溶性微量物质示踪剂研究[J]. 精细石油化工, 2020, 37(1): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXSY202001006.htm ZHOU Jingjing, HUANG Chunhua, SHEN Bin, et al. The research based on the new water-solubility micro substance tracers[J]. Peciality Petrochemicals, 2020, 37(1): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXSY202001006.htm
[10]	王跃宽, 陈维余, 温守国, 等. 新型微量物质示踪剂的评价及应用[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2019, 27(8): 27-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXHX201908009.htm WANG Yuekuan, CHEN Weiyu, WEN Shouguo, et al. Evaluation and application of new type trace substance tracer[J]. Fine and Specialty Chemicals, 2019, 27(8): 27-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXHX201908009.htm
[11]	池晓明, 李旭航, 张世虎, 等. 瓜胶压裂液体系示踪剂的筛选[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2015, 32(5): 83-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYW201505022.htm CHI Xiaoming, LI Xuhang, ZHANG Shihu, et al. Selection of tracers used in guar gum fracturing fluid[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2015, 32(5): 83-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYW201505022.htm
[12]	刘琦, 刁素, 栗铁锋. 胭脂红示踪剂在评价压裂液返排中的应用[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2016, 9(3): 65-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201603014.htm LIU Qi, DIAO Su, LI Tiefeng. Carmine tracer for evaluating flowback of fracturing fluid[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2016, 9(3): 65-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201603014.htm
[13]	邬传威, 梁金慧, 高利平, 等. 微量元素示踪剂在压裂示踪监测中的运用[J]. 化工管理, 2021(14): 96-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FGGL202114051.htm WU Chuanwei, LIANG Jinhui, GAO Liping, et al. Application of trace element tracer in fracturing tracing monitoring[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2021(14): 96-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FGGL202114051.htm
[14]	杨化光, 谈改生, 熊龙强, 等. 微量元素示踪剂在薄砂层油藏开发中的应用研究[J]. 石化技术, 2018, 25(12): 333. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJS201812261.htm YANG Huaguang, TAN Gaisheng, XIONG Longqiang, et al. Application of trace element tracer in the development of thin sand reservoir[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2018, 25(12): 333. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJS201812261.htm
[15]	WARNER N R, DARRAH T H, JACKSON R B. New tracers identify hydraulic fracturing fluids and accidental releases from oil and gas operations[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(21): 12552-12560.
[16]	NYE M, KNUCKLES T, YAN Beizhan, et al. Use of tracer elements for estimating community exposure to marcellus shale development operations[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(6): 1837.
[17]	曹煊, 李景喜, 俞晶晶, 等. 电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定井间示踪剂中稀土元素[J]. 岩矿测试, 2009, 28(2): 91-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YKCS200902004.htm CAO Xuan, LI Jingxi, YU Jingjing, et al. Determination of rare earth elements in inter-well tracers by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2009, 28(2): 91-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YKCS200902004.htm
[18]	MUKHOPADHYAY S, LIU H H, SPYCHER N, et al. Impact of fluid-rock chemical interactions on tracer transport in fractured rocks[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2013 154, 42-52.
[19]	JOHANNESSON K H, STETZENBACH K J, HODGE V F. Rare earth elements as geochemical tracers of regional groundwater mixing[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 61(17): 3605-3618.
[20]	OSSELINA F, NIGHTINGALEA M, HEARN G, et al. Quantifying the extent of flowback of hydraulic fracturing fluids using chemical and isotopic tracer approaches[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2018, 93: 20-29.