Pore characteristics of marl reservoir in Maokou Formation of Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 近期川东南多口钻井在茅口组一段灰泥灰岩储层实现了油气勘探突破,其作为一种新类型非常规气藏得到了大量关注。为了进一步弄清该区茅一段灰泥灰岩储层的岩石学特征和储层孔隙特征,基于野外和岩心样品,开展了岩石学和储层孔隙表征工作。研究表明:①茅一段主要发育于外缓坡相,灰泥灰岩的总有机碳含量平均值为0.76%~1.1%,平面上自北西向南东呈增大的趋势,与孔隙度变化趋势相似。②茅一段灰泥灰岩储集空间主要包含有机质孔、无机孔和微裂缝三大类,其中有机质孔可分为独立的有机质孔隙、包裹滑石的有机质孔隙和黄铁矿晶间有机质孔隙,无机孔可分为粒间孔、晶间孔、晶体内部溶孔,微裂缝可分为滑石缝、粒缘缝、应力缝;有机质孔在川东南地区茅一段灰泥灰岩储层中并不占主导地位,微裂缝是灰泥灰岩最重要的储集空间。③通过低温氮气吸附、低温CO2吸附、高压压汞实验以及纳米CT扫描联合表征,灰泥灰岩储层孔隙以细颈广体的墨水瓶形孔为主,微孔、中孔、宏孔均有发育,孔径主要分布在0.4~100 nm,跨度范围较大;灰泥灰岩非均质性明显,连通性较差,裂缝对于连通孔隙有重要影响。茅一段灰泥灰岩为一套新类型非常规储层,鉴于其复杂的矿物组成和特殊的孔隙特征,需加强有针对性的酸化压裂技术攻关,从而促进灰泥灰岩储层的油气勘探开发。Abstract: Breakthroughs of oil and gas exploration have recently been achieved via several wells in marl reservoirs of the first member of the middle Permian Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin. As a new type of unconventional gas reservoir, a lot of attention was attracted. In order to understand lithological characte-ristics and pore characteristics of marl reservoirs, lithological, pore types and pore structure characterization, works were carried out based on field and core samples. Results show that: (1) The TOC content of the marl reservoirs, which is mainly in outer gently sloping facies, is 0.76%-1.1%, with an increasing trend from northwest to southeast, similar to porosity changes. (2) Reservoir spaces of the marls mainly include organic pores, inorganic pores and microfractures. The organic pores can be classified into independent organic pores, organic pores with talc and intergranular organic pores of pyrite. The inorganic pores can be classified into intergranular pores, intercrystalline pores, and crystal dissolved pores. The microfractures can be classified into talc fractures, grain boundary fractures, and stress fractures. Organic pores are not dominant in the marl reservoirs, while microfractures are the most important reservoir space. (3) Combined characterization of cryogenic nitrogen adsorption, cryogenic CO2 adsorption, high-pressure Hg injection experiments and CT scan show that pores of the marls are mainly ink-bottle shaped with narrow neck and wide body. Micropores, mesopores and macropores are developed, with pore diameters of about 0.4-100 nm. The marls have obvious lithologic heterogeneity and poor connectivity. Fractures have an important influence on the connected pores. The marl in the first member of the Maokou Formation is a new type of unconventional reservoir, which has complex mineral composition and special pore characteristics. Targeted acid fracturing technology should be strengthen to promote the exploration and production of the marl reservoir.
-
Key words:
- marl /
- pore characteristics /
- reservoir /
- Maokou Formation /
- Middle Permian /
- southeastern Sichuan Basin /
- Sichuan Basin
-
图 3 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组一段灰泥灰岩野外露头及岩心特征
a-b.灰黑色灰泥灰岩与灰色颗粒灰岩互层发育,茅一段,冷水溪剖面;c.眼球状灰岩,茅一段,MY1井;d.黑色块状灰泥灰岩,茅一段,YH1井;e.深灰色灰泥灰岩,生物碎屑顺层发育,茅一段,DX1井;f.灰黑色灰泥灰岩具页理状特征,裂缝内见大量沥青、方解石及石英充填,茅一段,PQ1井
Figure 3. Characteristics of field and core samples of marls in first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 6 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组一段灰泥灰岩有机质孔微观特征
a.有机质赋存在方解石粒间缝内,茅一段,MY1井;b.有机质与滑石伴生发育,茅一段,MY1井;c.滑石包卷赋存于有机质中,呈丝缕状,茅一段,MY1井;d.滑石包卷于有机质孔隙内,呈丝带状,茅一段,MY1井;e.草莓状黄铁矿集合体,茅一段,YH1井;f.黄铁矿晶体间发育有机质,有机质孔较为发育,茅一段,MY1井
Figure 6. Microscopic characteristics of organic pores in marls in first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 7 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组一段灰泥灰岩微裂缝微观特征
a.有机质与滑石伴生,茅一段,MY1井;b.硅球、方解石与滑石成基底式胶结,茅一段,MY1井;c.白云石与滑石接触面发育粒缘缝,茅一段,MY1井;d.白云石周缘发育粒缘缝,茅一段,MY1井;e.应力缝沿粒缘缝和滑石缝发育,茅一段,MY1井;f.黄铁矿集合体附近发育应力缝,茅一段,MY1井
Figure 7. Microscopic characteristics of microfractures in marls in first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 8 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组一段灰泥灰岩无机孔微观特征
a.灰泥灰岩,见介壳类和棘皮类生屑,介壳类生屑被部分硅化,发育粒间孔,正交光,茅一段,MY1井;b.灰泥灰岩,大量生物碎屑堆积,生屑间发育粒间孔,正交光,茅一段,MY1井;c-d.白云石晶间孔,呈不规则状,茅一段,MY1井;e.白云石表面见溶孔,茅一段,MY1井;f.白云石表面溶孔内见自生石英,茅一段,MY1井
Figure 8. Microscopic characteristics of inorganic pores in marls in first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southeastern Sichuan Basin
-
[1] 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 魏国齐, 等. 四川盆地茅口组层序岩相古地理特征及储集层预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 45-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201201006.htmHU Mingyi, HU Zhonggui, WEI Guoqi, et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and reservoir prediction of the Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 45-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201201006.htm [2] 韩月卿, 韩文彪, 金振奎. 川西中二叠统栖霞组岩石学特征及沉积相研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(5): 563-572.HAN Yueqing, HAN Wenbiao, JIN Zhenkui. Lithological characteristics and sedimentary facies of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2022, 12(5): 563-572. [3] 韩月卿, 金振奎, 韩文彪. 川西中二叠统表生岩溶发育规律及控制因素研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(4): 483-494.HAN Yueqing, JIN Zhenkui, HAN Wenbiao. Development pattern and controlling factors of Middle Permian epigenetic karst in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2022, 12(4): 483-494. [4] 韩月卿, 张军涛, 韩文彪, 等. 热液白云岩定年方法研究: 以四川盆地二叠系热液白云岩为例[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(5): 627-635.HAN Yueqing, ZHANG Juntao, HAN Wenbiao, et al. Study on dating method of hydrothermal dolomite: a case study of hydrothermal dolomite of Permian formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2022, 12(5): 627-635. [5] 胡东风, 王良军, 张汉荣, 等. 碳酸盐岩烃源岩气藏的发现及其油气地质意义: 以四川盆地涪陵地区中二叠统茅口组一段气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(7): 23-33. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.07.003HU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, ZHANG Hanrong, et al. Discovery of carbonate source rock gas reservoir and its petroleum geological implications: a case study of the gas reservoir in the first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 23-33. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.07.003 [6] 刘瑾, 夏文谦, 李晶晶, 等. 川东南地区茅一段储层特征分析[J]. 科技通报, 2019, 35(7): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJTB201907006.htmLIU Jin, XIA Wenqian, LI Jingjing, et al. Analysis of reservoir characteristics of the first member of Maokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2019, 35(7): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJTB201907006.htm [7] 李蓉, 苏成鹏, 石国山, 等. 川南地区二叠系茅口组一段瘤状灰岩储层成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 806-815. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202106003.htmLI Rong, SU Chengpeng, SHI Guoshan, et al. The genesis of nodular limestone reservoirs of the first period of Maokou Formation of Permian in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(6): 806-815. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202106003.htm [8] 夏海帮, 包凯, 王睿, 等. 南川区块茅口组泥灰岩胶凝酸酸压试验[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 101-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102014.htmXIA Haibang, BAO Kai, WANG Rui, et al. Gelling acid fracturing experiment in Maokou marl formation of Nanchuan area[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 101-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102014.htm [9] 李昂, 罗开平, 李风勋, 等. 眼球状灰岩成因及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 452-460. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103452LI Ang, LUO Kaiping, LI Fengxun, et al. Origin of eyeball-shaped limestone and its significance for petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 452-460. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103452 [10] 罗进雄, 何幼斌, 何明薇, 等. 华南中二叠统眼球状石灰岩特征及成因的思考[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(4): 613-626. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201904007.htmLUO Jinxiong, HE Youbin, HE Mingwei, et al. Thoughts on characte-ristics and origin of the Middle Permian eyeball-shaped limestone in South China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(4): 613-626. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201904007.htm [11] 罗进雄, 何幼斌. 中—上扬子地区二叠系眼球状石灰岩特征及成因研究[J]. 地质论评, 2010, 56(5): 629-637. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201005005.htmLUO Jinxiong, HE Youbin. Thoughts on characteristics and origin of the Middle Permian eyeball-shaped limestone in South China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2010, 56(5): 629-637. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201005005.htm [12] 刘喜停, 颜佳新, 马志鑫, 等. 华南栖霞组灰岩—泥灰岩韵律层的成因[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2014, 39(2): 155-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201402003.htmLIU Xiting, YAN Jiaxin, MA Zhixin, et al. Origination of limestone-marl alternations from Qixia Formation of South China[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2014, 39(2): 155-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201402003.htm [13] 苏成鹏, 谭秀成, 王小芳, 等. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组眼球状石灰岩储层特征及成因[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25(1): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202001006.htmSU Chengpeng, TAN Xiucheng, WANG Xiaofang, et al. Characteristics of eyeball-shaped limestone reservoir and its genesis of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in east Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(1): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202001006.htm [14] 苏成鹏, 李飞, 谭秀成, 等. 古代碳酸盐岩台地自生泥质组分成因及意义: 以上寺剖面中二叠统茅口组为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(3): 550-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202103005.htmSU Chengpeng, LI Fei, TAN Xiucheng, et al. Origin and significance of authigenic argillaceous components on the ancient carbonate platform: a case study from the Maokou Formation of the Middle Permian at the Shangsi section, Guangyuan[J]. Acta Sedimentolo-gica Sinica, 2021, 39(3): 550-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202103005.htm [15] SU Chengpeng, LI Fei, TAN Xiucheng, et al. Recognition of diagenetic contribution to the formation of limestone-marl alternations: a case study from Permian of South China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 111: 765-785. [16] 夏威, 蔡潇, 丁安徐, 等. 南川地区栖霞—茅口组碳酸盐岩储集空间研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 63-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102008.htmXIA Wei, CAI Xiao, DING Anxu, et al. Reservoir spaces of carbonate rocks in Qixia-Maokou formation of Nanchuan area[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 63-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102008.htm [17] 任海侠, 林小兵, 刘叶, 等. 川西南二叠系茅口组一段滑石特征及其形成机理: 以A1井茅一段样品为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 1038-1047. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2021061038REN Haixia, LIN Xiaobing, LIU Ye, et al. Characteristics and formation mechanism of talc in Permian Maokou Formation, southwestern Sichuan Basin: a case study of first member of Maokou Formation in well A[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 1038-1047. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2021061038 [18] 夏文谦, 张汉荣, 刘瑾, 等. 川东南地区茅口组第一段灰泥灰岩储层储集空间构成定量分析[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(4): 435-444. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG202104006.htmXIA Wenqian, ZHANG Hanrong, LIU Jin, et al. Quantitative analysis of the space composition of marlite reservoir in the first member of Maokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 48(4): 435-444. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG202104006.htm [19] 赵培荣. 焦石坝地区茅一段储层特征及天然气勘探潜力[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 772-781. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202105016.htmZHAO Peirong. Reservoir characteristics and gas exploration potential of Permian Mao-1 Member of Maokou Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 772-781. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202105016.htm [20] 江青春, 汪泽成, 苏旺, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段泥灰岩源内非常规天然气成藏条件及有利勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 82-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202106006.htmJIANG Qingchun, WANG Zecheng, SU Wang, et al. Accumulation conditions and favorable exploration orientation of unconventional natural gas in the marl source rock of the first member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(6): 82-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202106006.htm [21] 张廷山, 陈晓慧, 刘治成, 等. 峨眉地幔柱构造对四川盆地栖霞期沉积格局的影响[J]. 地质学报, 2011, 85(8): 1251-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201108002.htmZHANG Tingshan, CHEN Xiaohui, LIU Zhicheng, et al. Effect of Emeishan mantle plume over the sedimentary pattern of Mid-Permian Xixia period in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(8): 1251-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201108002.htm [22] 杨柳, 巫芙蓉, 郭鸿喜, 等. 川南YJ向斜区茅口组储层地震预测与主控因素分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(3): 363-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202103015.htmYANG Liu, WU Furong, GUO Hongxi, et al. Reservoir seismic prediction and main controlling factors analysis of Maokou Formationin YJ Syncline area, South Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(3): 363-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202103015.htm [23] 潘磊, 徐祖新, 李让彬, 等. 川东南涪陵地区基底断裂特征与油气成藏[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 19-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202004003.htmPAN Lei, XU Zuxin, LI Rangbin, et al. Basement fault characte-rization and hydrocarbon accumulation in fuling of southeastern Sichuan[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reserviors, 2020, 27(4): 19-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202004003.htm [24] 许国明, 谢刚平, 隆轲, 等. 四川盆地西南部中二叠统沉积特征与勘探目标[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(7): 27-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201507008.htmXU Guoming, XIE Gangping, LONG Ke, et al. Sedimentary features and exploration targets of Middle Permian reservoirs in the southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(7): 27-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201507008.htm [25] 张涛, 林娟华, 韩月卿, 等. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组热液白云岩发育模式及对储层的改造[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 132-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202001013.htmZHANG Tao, LIN Juanhua, HAN Yueqing, et al. Pattern of hydrothermal dolomitization in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin, and its alteration on reservoirs herein[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 132-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202001013.htm [26] 胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地东部地区中二叠统茅口组白云岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 13-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906003.htmHU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, HUANG Renchun, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Maokou dolomite reservoirs in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 13-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906003.htm [27] 陈卫东, 陈义才, 徐发波, 等. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组地层划分、对比与岩溶古地貌恢复[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(6): 27-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202106006.htmCHEN Weidong, CHEN Yicai, XU Fabo, et al. Stratigraphic division and correlation and karst palaeogeomorphology restoration of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(6): 27-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202106006.htm [28] 施泽进, 夏文谦, 王勇, 等. 四川盆地东南部茅口组古岩溶特征及识别[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(3): 622-630. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201403002.htmSHI Zejin, XIA Wenqian, Wang Yong, et al. Characteristics and identification of paleokarst in the Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3): 622-630. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201403002.htm [29] 蔡珺君, 彭先, 李骞, 等. 四川盆地重点海相碳酸盐岩气藏产能评价现状及展望[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(5): 655-660. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105016.htmCAI Junjun, PENG Xian, LI Qian, et al. Present situation and prospect of productivity evaluation of key marine carbonate gas reservoirs in Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(5): 655-660. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105016.htm [30] 谢知含, 侯宇, 雷开强, 等. XC地区茅口组岩溶储层发育有利区预测[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(2): 230-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102016.htmXIE Zhihan, HOU Yu, LEI Kaiqiang, et al. Prediction of favorable development area of Maokou Formation karst reservoir in XC area[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(2): 230-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102016.htm [31] 李大军, 陈辉, 陈洪德, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组储层形成与古构造演化关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(5): 756-763. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201605016.htmLI Dajun, CHEN Hui, CHEN Hongde, et al. Relationship between reservoir development in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation and paleostructure evolution in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(5): 756-763. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201605016.htm [32] 蓝光志, 张廷山, 高卫东. 川西北地区早志留世瘤状灰岩的类型、成因及意义[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 1994, 16(3): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY403.000.htmLAN Guangzhi, ZHANG Tingshan, GAO Weidong. Classification, genesis and significance of nodular limestone of Early Silurian in NW Sichuan[J]. Journal of Southwestern Petroleum Institute, 1994, 16(3): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY403.000.htm [33] 董兆雄, 朱晓惠, 侯方浩, 等. 一种特殊瘤状灰岩的成因研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(1): 20-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200201003.htmDONG Zhaoxiong, ZHU Xiaohui, HOU Fanghao, et al. Study on origin of special nodular limestone[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(1): 20-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200201003.htm [34] 田小彬, 师江波, 董景海, 等. 川中地区茅口组一段沉积相新认识: 基于最新钻井资料[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(11): 1646-1655. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202111005.htmTIAN Xiaobin, SHI Jiangbo, DONG Jinghai, et al. New understanding of sedimentary facies of the first Member of Maokou Formation based on the latest drilling in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(11): 1646-1655. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202111005.htm [35] 钱树, 张萌萌. 中上扬子地区栖霞期缺氧沉积特征[J]. 当代化工研究, 2016(8): 10-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJTY201608005.htmQIAN Shu, ZHANG Mengmeng. Anoxic deposition characteristics of upper Middle Yangtze region in Qixia stage[J]. Modern Chemical Research, 2016(8): 10-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJTY201608005.htm [36] 张培先, 何希鹏, 高全芳, 等. 四川盆地东南缘二叠系茅口组一段页岩气藏地质特征及富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 146-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101014.htmZHANG Peixian, HE Xipeng, GAO Quanfang, et al. Geological characteristics and enrichment pattern of Permian Mao 1 Member shale gas reservoirs at the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 146-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101014.htm [37] 王凯, 乔鹏, 王壮森, 等. 基于二氧化碳和液氮吸附、高压压汞和低场核磁共振的煤岩多尺度孔径表征[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(4): 146-152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201704029.htmWANG Kai, QIAO Peng, WANG Zhuangsen, et al. Multiple scale pore size characterization of coal based on carbon dioxide and liquid nitrogen adsorption, high-pressure mercury intrusion and low field nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2017, 26(4): 146-152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201704029.htm [38] 查明, 尹向烟, 姜林, 等. CT扫描技术在石油勘探开发中的应用[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(4): 228-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201704030.htmZHA Ming, YIN Xiangyan, JIANG Lin, et al. Application of CT technology in petroleum exploration and development[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2017, 36(4): 228-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201704030.htm [39] 韩月卿, 姜至远, 冯国奇, 等. 川东南五峰—龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构特征及影响因素[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(3): 298-309.HAN Yueqing, JIANG Zhiyuan, FENG Guoqi, et al. Pore structure classification and influence factors of shale reservoir of Wufeng-Longmaxi formation in southeast Sichuan[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2022, 12(3): 298-309. [40] 刘树根, 马文辛, LUBA J, 等. 四川盆地东部地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(8): 2239-2252. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201605006.htmLIU Shugen, MA Wenxin, LUBA J, et al. Characteristics of the shale gas reservoir rocks in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, east Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(8): 2239-2252. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201605006.htm