Petroleum allocation method for exploration strategic planning
-
摘要: 在油气勘探战略规划研究中，需要综合分析不同区带的勘探形势、资源基础、工程技术条件，确立未来一个时期资源接替序列、油气勘探重点和发展目标。通过不同区带勘探现状、勘探潜力进行定量计算，建立了一种勘探战略规划中的资源配置方法。该方法首先建立了包含资源探明程度、探井密度、三维地震覆盖密度等3个关键参数的勘探现状指数公式，对当前的勘探状态进行定量计算；其次建立了勘探潜力定量评价公式，综合纳入了反映勘探状态的阶段探明速度、资源潜力、工程技术适应性等参数；最后将勘探现状指数与勘探潜力指数置于统一评价平台，建立了勘探现状指数和勘探潜力指数交会图版，形成了8个油气资源配置区，按照勘探状态对比定策略、潜力定量评价定目标的思路，确立了一个时期内油气勘探发展重点与勘探部署时序，满足了不同区带间状态明确、潜力定量、技术可行的资源配置需求。该评价方法具有普适性、评价结果具有唯一性的特点。Abstract: During petroleum exploration strategic planning and study, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze on exploration status, resource basis and engineering technology conditions of various plays, in order to determine resource replacement sequence, petroleum exploration focus and development targets in the future. According to quantitative calculation on exploration status and potential of different plays, a resource allocation method in exploration strategic planning was established. In this method, an exploration status index formula for three key parameters, namely, resource proven degree, exploration well density and 3D seismic coverage density was firstly constructed for quantitative calculation on current exploration status. Secondly, a quantitative evaluation formula for exploration potential was established and incorporated comprehensively with some parameters like interim proven speed that reflected exploration status, resource potential and engineering technologic adaptability. Finally, exploration status index and potential index were put in unified evaluation platform in order to construct a cross plot for these two indexes, and then eight petroleum resource allocation areas were formed. According to the thinking of the strategy defined by the comparison on exploration status and the target by quantitative potential evaluation, petroleum exploration and development focus and exploration allocation sequence in certain period were determined to meet resource allocation requirement on clear status, quantitative potential and feasible technology for various plays. This evaluation method has the characteristics of universality and unique evaluation result.
-
图 1 我国部分重点增储潜力区带资源配置图版
Ⅰ1区.高勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力大，可适度加大三新领域勘探力度；Ⅰ2区.高勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力小，可维持适当投资，保持勘探节奏；Ⅱ1区.中高勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力大，可适度加大三新领域勘探力度；Ⅱ2区.中高勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力小，可维持适当投资，保持勘探节奏；Ⅲ1区.中等勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力大，可加大勘探突破和区带拓展力度；Ⅲ2区.中等勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力小，保持持续勘探；Ⅳ1区.低勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力大，可加大风险勘探力度；Ⅳ2区.低勘探程度阶段，勘探潜力小，保持持续探索
Figure 1. Resource allocation chart of some key potential plays for increasing reserves in China
表 1 我国部分油气勘探区带勘探现状指数判识
Table 1. Identification on exploration status index in some petroleum exploration areas in China
分类 勘探程度 勘探现状指数 区带/ 个 面积/104 km2 累计探明储量 阶段探明速度/% 石油/104 t 天然气/108 m3 Ⅰ 高 ＞0.5 10 3.21 55.23 5 901 0.2~0.5 Ⅱ 中高 0.25~0.5 13 4.42 26.36 7 504 0.5~1.0 Ⅲ 中等 0.1~0.25 24 13.09 4.18 8 417 0.5~1.3 Ⅳ 低 ＜0.1 21 17.14 1.17 2 921 0~0.5 合计 68 37.86 86.94 24 743 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 工程技术适应性(Rzi)影响因子赋值标准
Table 2. Assignment standards for impact factors of engineering technology adaptability (Rzi)
影响因子 取值范围 [1, 0.75) [0.75, 0.5) [0.5, 0.25) (0.25, 0] 关键技术(E1) 地表条件好且无施工限制；地下目标易于识别；地层可钻性好；测录试工程技术不受限 地表条件较好且无施工限制；地下目标较易识别；地层可钻性较好；测录试工程技术基本不受限 地表条件复杂或施工有限制；地下目标难于识别；地层可钻性较差；测录试工程技术受限较大 地表条件十分复杂或施工受限制；地下目标很难识别；地层可钻性非常差；测录试工程无法正常开展 地质认识(E2) 地质结构简单，受单一构造控制；地质认识成熟，勘探思路与方法适应 地质结构较复杂，构造活动中等；地质认识较成熟，勘探思路与方法较适应 地质结构复杂，构造活动较强；地质认识有待深化，勘探思路与方法有待完善 地质结构非常复杂，构造活动强烈；地质认识亟待深化，勘探思路与方法亟待形成
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 我国部分石油天然气区带勘探潜力评价指数
Table 3. Evaluation index of exploration potential for some oil and gas plays in China
石油区带 勘探潜力指数权重/% 天然气区带 勘探潜力指数权重/% A1 25.34 B1 20.0 A2 9.41 B2 16.5 A3 6.49 B3 15.1 A4 6.11 B4 14.6 A5 5.85 B5 10.0 A6 5.70 B6 5.3 A7 5.19 B7 5.2 A8 4.95 B8 3.7 A9 3.31 B9 3.0 A10 2.86 B10 3.0 … … … 合计 100.00 合计 100.0
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 方朝亮, 撒利明, 王雪松. 规范科技发展规划编制方法支撑中国石油"十三五"科技发展规划编制[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2014, 33(6): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2014.06.001FANG Chaoliang, SA Liming, WANG Xuesong. Standardize methods for formulation of science and technology development plan to support CNPC's science and technology development plan in 13th Five-Year Plan period[J]. Oil Forum, 2014, 33(6): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2014.06.001 [2] 唐玮, 尹得来, 冯金德, 等. 新形势下编制油气上游业务规划的思考[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2019, 38(3): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2019.03.001TANG Wei, YIN Delai, FENG Jinde, et al. Opinions on formulation of oil and gas upstream plans under new situation[J]. Oil Forum, 2019, 38(3): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2019.03.001 [3] 张军贤, 张礼安, 张震, 等. 中国石油集团战略规划管理体系创新与实践[J]. 国际石油经济, 2019, 27(3): 81-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJJJ201903013.htmZHANG Junxian, ZHANG Li'an, ZHANG Zhen, et al. Innovation and practice on the strategic planning management of CNPC[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2019, 27(3): 81-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJJJ201903013.htm [4] 黄东, 李育聪, 刘敏, 等. 川中地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组一段油气藏特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(2): 44-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.02.005HUANG Dong, LI Yucong, LIU Min, et al. Reservoir features and exploration potential of the 1st member of Shaximiao Formation of Middle Jurassic in central Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(2): 44-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.02.005 [5] 孙建博, 孙兵华, 赵谦平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组长7湖相页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6): 29-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.06.004SUN Jianbo, SUN Binghua, ZHAO Qianping, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential evaluation of Chang 7 lacustrine shale oil in Yanchang Formation, Fuxian area, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(6): 29-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.06.004 [6] 邹娟, 金涛, 李雪松, 等. 川东地区下侏罗统勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(4): 30-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.04.004ZOU Juan, JIN Tao, LI Xuesong, et al. Evaluation on exploration potentials of Lower Jurassic reservoirs in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(4): 30-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.04.004 [7] 王改卫, 张海义, 郭轩, 等. 黄河口凹陷古近系地层结构新认识与勘探潜力评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(5): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202005002.htmWANG Gaiwei, ZHANG Haiyi, GUO Xuan, et al. Insights of Paleogene stratigraphic structure and evaluation of exploration potential of Huanghekou Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(5): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202005002.htm [8] 谷志宇, 刘恩涛, 王香增, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组七段页岩发育特征及勘探潜力[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(1): 95-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101013.htmGU Zhiyu, LIU Entao, Wang Xiangzeng, et al. Development characteristics and exploration potential of shale in Chang7 Member in Southeast of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(1): 95-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101013.htm [9] 李军. 致密油藏储量升级潜力不确定性评价方法及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 755-764. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202103021.htmLi Jun. Non-deterministic method for tight oil reserves upgrade potential assessment and its application[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 755-764. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202103021.htm [10] 石磊, 黄学斌, 刘景亮, 等. 保有石油预测储量升级潜力评价方法及升级策略[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 176-183. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101176SHI Lei, HUANG Xuebin, LIU Jingliang, et al. Evaluation of upgrading potential and strategy for inferred initially in-place petroleum[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 176-183. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101176 [11] 高荣杰. 齐家火山岩油藏特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 37-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202105006.htmGAO Rongjie. Analysis of the characteristics and exploration potential of volcanic hydrocarbon reservoir in Qijia Area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reserviors, 2021, 28(1): 37-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202105006.htm [12] 熊亮, 葛忠伟, 王同, 等. 川南寒武系筇竹寺组勘探潜力研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(1): 14-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101003.htmXIONG Liang, GE Zhongwei, WANG Tong, et al. Exploration potential of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 14-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101003.htm [13] 肖玉茹, 黄学斌, 李姝, 等. 基于量化不确定性的储量升级动用潜力评价方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 169-175. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101169XIAO Yuru, HUANG Xuebin, LI Shu, et al. A method for evaluating the potential of reserve upgrading based on quantitative uncertainty[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 169-175. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101169 [14] 苏映宏. 探明未开发储量可动潜力评价新方法及应用: 以Y油藏为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 331-336. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202331SU Yinghong. A new method for the evaluation of the utilization potential of proved undeveloped reserves and its application: a case study of Y reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, , 2022, 44(2): 331-336. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202331 [15] 连志刚, 常智勇, 李路路, 等. 玛东地区二叠系火山岩成藏特征及勘探潜力[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 57-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202205008.htmLIAN Zhigang, CHANG Zhiyong, LI Lulu, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and exploration potential of Permian volcanic rocks in Madong area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(5): 57-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202205008.htm [16] 梁治国, 叶青, 张丹, 等. 开鲁盆地陆西凹陷早白垩世地层构造演化及勘探潜力[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 69-75.LIANG Zhiguo, YE Qing, ZHANG Dan, et al. Early Cretaceous stratigraphic evolution and exploration potential of Luxi Sag Kailu Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reserviors, 2022, 29(4): 69-75. [17] 方小东, 郭元岭, 胡兴中, 等. 油气勘探状态评价新方法[J]. 河南石油, 2005, 19(6): 6-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN200506001.htmFANG Xiaodong, GUO Yuanling, HU Xingzhong, et al. New evaluation method of petroleum exploration[J]. Henan Petroleum, 2005, 19(6): 6-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN200506001.htm [18] 郭元岭. 油气勘探发展规律及战略研究方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010: 69-76.GUO Yuanling. Development law and strategic research method of oil and gas exploration[M]. Beijing: China Petroleum Industry Press, 2010: 69-76. [19] 金之钧, 蔡勋育, 刘金连, 等. 中国石油化工股份有限公司近期勘探进展与资源发展战略[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(1): 14-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201801002.htmJIN Zhijun, CAI Xunyu, LIU Jinlian, et al. The recent exploration progress and resource development strategy of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(1): 14-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201801002.htm [20] 冯建辉, 蔡勋育, 牟泽辉, 等. 中国石油化工股份有限公司"十二五"油气勘探进展与"十三五"展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603001.htmFENG Jianhui, CAI Xunyu, MOU Zehui, et al. Oil and gas exploration of China petroleum and chemical corporation during the 12th Five-Year Plan and the prospect for the 13th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(3): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603001.htm [21] 蔡勋育, 刘金连, 赵培荣, 等. 中国石化油气勘探进展与上游业务发展战略[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001002.htmCAI Xunyu, LIU Jinlian, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Oil and gas exploration progress and upstream development strategy of SINOPEC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001002.htm [22] 蔡勋育, 刘金连, 张宇, 等. 中国石化"十三五"油气勘探进展与"十四五"前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(1): 31-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202101003.htmCAI Xunyu, LIU Jinlian, ZHANG Yu, et al. Oil and gas exploration progress of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and prospect forecast for the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(1): 31-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202101003.htm [23] 郭旭升, 蔡勋育, 刘金连, 等. 中国石化"十三五"天然气勘探进展与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 12-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202108003.htmGUO Xusheng, CAI Xunyu, LIU Jinlian, et al. Natural gas exploration progress of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan and prospect forecast during the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 12-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202108003.htm -
图(1) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 390
- HTML全文浏览量: 125
- PDF下载量: 133
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号