浅层海相页岩含气性特征及其主控因素——以昭通太阳区块下志留统龙马溪组为例

李娟; 陈雷; 计玉冰; 程青松

doi:10.11781/sysydz202302296

浅层海相页岩含气性特征及其主控因素——以昭通太阳区块下志留统龙马溪组为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302296

李娟^{1, 2, 3,},
陈雷^{1, 2, 3, ,},
计玉冰⁴,
程青松⁴

1.
西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500
2.
天然气地质四川省重点实验室, 成都 610500
3.
中国石油天然气集团有限公司碳酸盐岩储层重点实验室西南石油大学研究分室, 成都 610500
4.
中国石油浙江油田公司, 杭州 310023

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目 41602147

中国石油—西南石油大学创新联合体科技合作项目 2020CX020000

详细信息

作者简介:
李娟(1999-), 女, 硕士生, 主要研究方向为非常规油气。E-mail: 3406916041@qq.com

通讯作者:
陈雷(1985-), 男, 副教授, 从事非常规油气、碳酸盐岩沉积与储层、层序地层学方面研究。E-mail: cl211@126.com

中图分类号: TE122.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 483
- HTML全文浏览量: 253
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-22
- 修回日期: 2023-02-14
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-28

Gas-bearing characteristics and major controlling factors of shallow marine shale: a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Taiyang block of Zhaotong area

LI Juan^{1, 2, 3
,},
CHEN Lei^{1, 2, 3
, ,},
JI Yubing⁴,
CHENG Qingsong⁴

1.
School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2.
Natural Gas Geology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
3.
Southwest Petroleum University Division of Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs, CNPC, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
4.
Zhejiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China

摘要

摘要: 浅层页岩气（埋深小于1 500 m）的勘探开发具有成本低、建产快等特点，受到广泛关注。昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块下志留统龙马溪组页岩气具有埋深浅、高含气量的特点，显示出良好的勘探潜力，但前人对该区浅层页岩气的含气性分布及主控因素研究较少。为了丰富这方面的研究，利用太阳区块龙马溪组一段页岩样品的分析测试资料，对其含气性特征及主控因素进行分析。研究区龙一₁¹小层总含气量最高，自下而上含气量逐渐降低，平面上龙一₁亚段页岩含气量高值区位于研究区北部和南部；有机质含量、矿物组分、储层物性及外部保存条件等对研究区龙一₁亚段浅层页岩含气性具有一定的控制作用。有机质是生成页岩气的原始物质，同时其生烃裂解形成的有机质孔为页岩气提供大量的储存空间，有机质含量是总含气量的最主要控制因素；硅质矿物含量高，有利于后期压裂开发。研究区龙一₁亚段顶底板地层岩性致密，封闭性良好，具有微超压—超压特征，有效阻止了页岩气逸散，勘探前景广阔。
- 浅层页岩气 /
- 龙马溪组 /
- 含气性特征 /
- 控制因素 /
- 昭通地区
Abstract: The exploration and development of shallow shale gas has the advantages of low cost and fast production reduction, so it has attracted wide attention. The shale gas in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation (S₁l) in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone has the characteristics of shallow burial depth and high gas content, showing good exploration potential. However, the gas-bearing distribution and major controlling factors of shallow shale gas in this research area are rarely studied previously. In order to enrich the research in this field, this paper analyzes the gas-bearing characteristics and the major controlling factors of the shale samples of Long-1 subsection (S₁l₁) in the Taiyang block. The results show that the total gas content of S₁l₁^1-1 is the highest in the study area, the gas content gradually decreases from bottom to top, and areas with high shale gas content in S₁l₁ appear in the north and south of the study area on the plane. Organic matter content, mineral components, reservoir properties and external preservation conditions have a certain role in controlling the gas properties of shallow shale in S₁l₁¹ subsection of the study area. Organic matter is the primitivesubstance that generates shale gas, at the same time, the organic matter hole formed by hydrocarbon cracking sprovides a lot of storage pace for shale gas, while the content of organic matter is the major controlling factor of the total gas content. The high content of silicoide is conducive to later fracturing development. The adjacent rock strata of S₁l₁¹ subsection in the study area are compact in lithology, with good sealing property, showing the characteristics of slight overpressure and overpressure, which effectively prevents the escape of shale gas, and has broad exploration prospects.
- shallow shale gas /
- Longmaxi Formation /
- gas-bearing characteristics /
- controlling factors /
- Zhaotong area

HTML全文

图 1 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块构造背景

据文献[6]修改。

Figure 1. Structural background of Taiyang block in Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块龙马溪组页岩总含气量

Figure 2. Total shale gas content in Longmaxi Formation in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 昭通太阳区块T1井龙马溪组页岩含气量垂向变化序列

Figure 3. Vertical variation of Longmaxi Formation shale gas content in well T1, Taiyang block of Zhaotong

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块龙马溪组龙一₁亚段4个小层总含气量平面分布

Figure 4. Plane distribution of total gas content in four layers of S₁l₁ in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩储层各参数与含气量相关关系

Figure 5. Correlation between shale reservoir parameters and gas content in S₁l₁ in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩储层微观特征

Figure 6. Microscopic characteristics of shale reservoirs in S₁l₁ in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块浅层页岩气富集成藏模式

据文献[8]修改。

Figure 7. Accumulation model of shallow shale gas in Taiyang block, Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块下志留统龙马溪组一段浅层页岩含气量

Table 1. Shale gas content in S₁l₁ in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

层位		吸附气量/(m³·t^-1)	游离气量/(m³·t^-1)	总含气量/(m³·t^-1)	样品数量
龙一₂亚段		0.39~1.19(0.77)	0.03~1.38(0.41)	0.42~2.50(1.17)	28
龙一₁亚段	龙一₁⁴	0.54~1.88(1.27)	0.22~2.10(1.13)	1.07~3.24(2.40)	14
	龙一₁³	1.24~2.33(1.80)	0.50~1.93(1.25)	2.36~3.63(3.04)	16
	龙一₁²	1.36~2.53(2.01)	0.70~2.27(1.33)	2.40~4.32(3.34)	10
	龙一₁¹	1.75~4.34(2.84)	1.04~2.21(1.75)	3.46~6.34(4.59)	3
总计		0.39~4.34(1.74)	0.03~2.27(1.17)	0.42~6.34(2.91)	71
注：表中数值意义为：最小值~最大值(平均值)，表 2同。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩储层矿物成分及总有机质含量

Table 2. Mineral composition and TOC of shale reservoirs in S₁l₁ in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone %

层位	石英	石英+长石	碳酸盐矿物	黏土矿物	ω(TOC)
龙一₁⁴小层	(27.60~41.40)35.48	(30.70~45.00)39.32	(18.90~42.40)25.55	(23.70~34.60)30.37	(2.00~2.90)2.48
龙一₁³小层	(27.10~48.30)39.56	(32.10~50.80)43.43	(17.20~34.60)24.25	(21.60~32.20)27.56	(2.50~3.50)2.97
龙一₁²小层	(33.10~68.70)44.07	(38.10~69.70)47.80	(10.40~38.90)25.45	(15.90~26.20)21.88	(2.96~5.60)3.80
龙一₁¹小层	(8.70~60.10)27.68	(9.80~67.50)30.78	(10.40~76.50)45.50	(9.90~28.80)18.65	(0.98~6.66)4.14
总计	(8.70~68.70)36.70	(9.80~69.70)40.33	(10.40~76.50)30.19	(9.90~34.60)24.62	(0.98~6.66)3.35

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳区块龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩气压力系数

Table 3. Pressure coefficient of shale gas in S₁l₁ in Taiyang block of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone

井号	井深/m	压力系数(测井)
T5	948~973	1.20
T4	740~780	1.46
T2	1 051~1 689	1.40
T7	1 633~1 693	1.40
注：数据引自文献[12, 19]。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(44)

[1]	董大忠, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 页岩气资源潜力与勘探开发前景[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3): 324-336. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1019.htm DONG Dazhong, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Resource potential, exploration and development prospect of shale gas in the whole world[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3): 324-336. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1019.htm
[2]	胡明毅, 邱小松, 胡忠贵, 等. 页岩气储层研究现状及存在问题探讨[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2015.02.001 HU Mingyi, QIU Xiaosong, HU Zhonggui, et al. Current researches on shale gas reservoirs and existing problems[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2015.02.001
[3]	张金川, 陶佳, 李振, 等. 中国深层页岩气资源前景和勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 15-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101003.htm ZHANG Jinchuan, TAO Jia, LI Zhen, et al. Prospect of deep shale gas resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 15-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101003.htm
[4]	杨跃明, 陈玉龙, 刘燊阳, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘页岩气勘探开发现状、潜力与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 42-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101006.htm YANG Yueming, CHEN Yulong, LIU Shenyang, et al. Status, potential and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 42-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101006.htm
[5]	张姗. 美国页岩气发展现状及对我国页岩气开发的启示[J]. 中国能源, 2020, 42(6): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGLN202006005.htm ZHANG Shan. Present situation of U.S. shale gas and its insights for China[J]. Energy of China, 2020, 42(6): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGLN202006005.htm
[6]	杨光, 田伟志, 吕江, 等. 威远构造W202区块龙马溪组龙11亚段页岩气储集层岩石学特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 34-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.02.005 YANG Guang, TIAN Weizhi, LYU Jiang, et al. Petrological characteristics of shale gas reservoirs in Long 11 sub-member of Longmaxi Formation in W202 Block of Weiyuan structure[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(2): 34-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.02.005
[7]	梁兴, 张廷山, 舒红林, 等. 滇黔北昭通示范区龙马溪组页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(1): 72-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9372.2020.01.020 LIANG Xing, ZHANG Tingshan, SHU Honglin, et al. Evaluation of shale gas resource potential of Longmaxi Formation in Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area in the northern Yunnan-Guizhou[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(1): 72-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9372.2020.01.020
[8]	舒志国, 王进. 四川盆地涪陵气田焦石坝区块上部气层地质特征分析及有利区优选[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 34-44. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101034 SHU Zhiguo, WANG Jin. Geological characteristics and optimization of favorable areas in the upper gas reservoir of Jiaoshiba block in the Fuling Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 34-44. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101034
[9]	李明阳, 黎承银, 屈大鹏. 川东南涪陵地区凉高山组凝析油气藏特征及成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 387-395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202204002.htm LI Mingyang, LI Chengyin, QU Dapeng. Characteristics and genesis of condensate reservoirs of Lianggaoshan formation in Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(4): 387-395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202204002.htm
[10]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝. 中国南方海相油气勘探展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675 GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, DUAN Jinbao. Marine petroleum exploration in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675
[11]	陆亚秋, 梁榜, 王超, 等. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田江东区块下古生界深层页岩气勘探开发实践与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 241-250. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101021.htm LU Yaqiu, LIANG Bang, WANG Chao, et al. Shale gas exploration and development in the Lower Paleozoic Jiangdong block of Fuling gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 241-250. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101021.htm
[12]	何勇, 李林, 刘成, 等. 盆外山地浅层页岩气经济有效开发对策探索[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(4): 82-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202104012.htm HE Yong, LI Lin, LIU Cheng, et al. Economic and effective development of shale gas in mountainous areas outside the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(4): 82-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202104012.htm
[13]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 蒋廷学. 四川盆地深层页岩气规模有效开发面临的挑战与对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 135-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102001.htm HE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, JIANG Tingxue. Challenges and countermeasures of effective development with large scale of deep shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 135-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102001.htm
[14]	梁兴, 张朝, 单长安, 等. 山地浅层页岩气勘探挑战、对策与前景: 以昭通国家级页岩气示范区为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2): 27-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202102007.htm LIANG Xing, ZHANG Zhao, SHAN Chang'an, et al. Exploration challenges, countermeasures and prospect of mountain shallow shale gas: a cased study on the Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2): 27-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202102007.htm
[15]	WEN Tao, CASTRO M C, ELLIS B R, et al. Assessing compositional variability and migration of natural gas in the Antrim shale in the Michigan Basin using noble gas geochemistry[J]. Chemical Geology, 2015, 417: 356-370. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Ellis6/publication/283290967_Assessing_compositional_variability_and_migration_of_natural_gas_in_the_Antrim_Shale_in_the_Michigan_Basin_using_noble_gas_geochemistry/links/570cfeae08ae2b772e42a843.pdf
[16]	WEI Lin, SCHIMMELMANN A, MASTALERZ M, et al. Catalytic generation of methane at 60-100 ℃ and 0.1-300 MPa from source rocks containing kerogen types I, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2018, 231: 88-116. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/324606905_Catalytic_generation_of_methane_at_60_to_100_C_and_01_to_300_MPa_from_source_rocks_containing_kerogen_Types_I_II_and_III
[17]	DEZIEL N C, HUMEAU Z, ELLIOTT E G, et al. Shale gas activity and increased rates of sexually transmitted infections in Ohio, 2000-2016[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194203. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM26658657
[18]	王鹏万, 张磊, 李昌, 等. 黑色页岩氧化还原条件与有机质富集机制: 以昭通页岩气示范区A井五峰组—龙马溪组下段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5): 933-943. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705012.htm WANG Pengwan, ZHANG Lei, LI Chang, et al. Redox conditions and organic enrichment mechanisms of black shale: a case from the Wufeng-Lower Longmaxi formations in well A in Zhaotong Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5): 933-943. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705012.htm
[19]	伍坤宇, 张廷山, 杨洋, 等. 昭通示范区黄金坝气田五峰—龙马溪组页岩气储层地质特征[J]. 中国地质, 2016, 43(1): 275-287. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201601020.htm WU Kunyu, ZHANG Tingshan, YANG Yang, et al. Geological characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale-gas reservoir in the Huangjinba gas field, Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. Geology in China, 2016, 43(1): 275-287. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201601020.htm
[20]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张朝, 等. 昭通太阳背斜区浅层页岩气勘探突破及其资源开发意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 11-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001003.htm LIANG Xing, XU Zhengyu, ZHANG Zhao, et al. Breakthrough of shallow shale gas exploration in Taiyang anticline area and its significance for resource development in Zhaotong, Yunnan province, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 11-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001003.htm
[21]	杜建平, 叶熙, 史树有, 等. 复杂山地页岩气勘探开发技术创新与成效: 以昭通国家级页岩气示范区为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(4): 41-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202104007.htm DU Jianping, YE Xi, SHI Shuyou, et al. Technological innovation and achievements in the exploration and development of shale gas in complex mountainous areas: a case study of the Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(4): 41-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202104007.htm
[22]	梁兴, 叶熙, 张朝, 等. 滇黔北探区YQ1井页岩气的发现及其意义[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(6): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201406001.htm LIANG Xing, YE Xi, ZHANG Zhao, et al. Significance of discovery of shale gas from well YQ-1 in northern Yunnan-Guizhou Pro-vinces, China[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(6): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201406001.htm
[23]	陈志鹏, 梁兴, 张介辉, 等. 昭通国家级示范区龙马溪组页岩气储层超压成因浅析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 442-448. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201603008.htm CHEN Zhipeng, LIANG Xing, ZHANG Jiehui, et al. Genesis analysis of shale reservoir overpressure of Longmaxi Formation in Zhaotong Demonstration Area, Dianqianbei Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(3): 442-448. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201603008.htm
[24]	蒲泊伶, 董大忠, 王凤琴, 等. 川南地区龙马溪组沉积亚相精细划分及地质意义[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3): 15-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX202003002.htm PU Boling, DONG Dazhong, WANG Fengqin, et al. Re-division and evolution of sedimentary subfacies of Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2020, 44(3): 15-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX202003002.htm
[25]	杨洋. 川南长宁地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2016. YANG Yang. Study of Longmaxi shale reservoir in Changning area, southern Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[26]	叶玥豪. 四川盆地五峰—龙马溪组页岩储层形成机理[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2018. YE Yuehao. Formation mechanism of shale reservoir in Wufeng-Longmaxi formation in Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2018.
[27]	何卫红, 汪啸风, 卜建军. 晚奥陶世五峰期扬子海盆海平面变化旋回与古水体深度[J]. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(3): 367-375. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200203001.htm HE Weihong, WANG Xiaofeng, BU Jianjun. The Eustatic cycles and the depth of water mass of the Latest Ordovician Wufengian in the Yangtse Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(3): 367-375. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200203001.htm
[28]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张介辉, 等. 浅层页岩气高效勘探开发关键技术: 以昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳背斜区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202009003.htm LIANG Xing, XU Zhengyu, ZHANG Jiehui, et al. Key efficient exploration and development technoloiges of shallow shale gas: a case study of Taiyang anticline area of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202009003.htm
[29]	周倚. 四川盆地长宁地区龙马溪组优质页岩储层评价及地质建模[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019. ZHOU Yi. Quality shale reservoir evaluation and geological modeling of Longmaxi Formation in Changning area, Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019.
[30]	孙健. 黔北地区浅层龙马溪组页岩含气性及其控制因素[D]. 广州: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2020. SUN Jian. Gas in place and its controlling factors of the shallow Longmaxi shale in the northern Guizhou area[D]. Guangzhou: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2020.
[31]	林拓, 张金川, 李博, 等. 湘西北常页1井下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气聚集条件及含气特征[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(5): 839-846. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201405003.htm LIN Tuo, ZHANG Jinchuan, LI Bo, et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions and gas-bearing properties of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in well Changye 1, northwestern Hunan[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(5): 839-846. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201405003.htm
[32]	张金川, 刘树根, 魏晓亮, 等. 页岩含气量评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 28-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101004.htm ZHANG Jinchuan, LIU Shugen, WEI Xiaoliang, et al. Evaluation of gas content in shale[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 28-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101004.htm
[33]	钟光海, 谢冰, 周肖, 等. 四川盆地页岩气储层含气量的测井评价方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8): 43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201608009.htm ZHONG Guanghai, XIE Bing, ZHOU Xiao, et al. A logging evaluation method for gas content of shale gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(8): 43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201608009.htm
[34]	徐政语, 梁兴, 鲁慧丽, 等. 昭通示范区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成藏类型与有利区分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2021, 26(4): 289-298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202104001.htm XU Zhengyu, LIANG Xing, LU Huili, et al. Shale gas accumulation types and favorable area distribution of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Zhaotong Demonstration Area[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2021, 26(4): 289-298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202104001.htm
[35]	毕赫, 姜振学, 李鹏, 等. 渝东南地区黔江凹陷五峰组—龙马溪组页岩储层特征及其对含气量的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(8): 1275-1283. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201408020.htm BI He, JIANG Zhenxue, LI Peng, et al. Shale reservoir characte-ristics and its influence on gas content of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the southeastern Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(8): 1275-1283. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201408020.htm
[36]	曹小朋. 矿物组成对页岩油渗流机理的影响[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(5): 609-613. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105007.htm CAO Xiaopeng. Influence of mineral composition on shale oil seepage mechanism[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(5): 609-613. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105007.htm
[37]	CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1921-1938. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=refg13/ref13&dbid=16&doi=10.1139%2Fcjes-2014-0188&key=10.1306%2F61EEDDBE-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[38]	MONTGOMERY S L, JARVIE D M, BOWKER K A, et al. Missi-ssippian Barnett shale, Fort Worth Basin, north-central Texas: gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(2): 155-175.
[39]	魏志红, 魏祥峰. 页岩不同类型孔隙的含气性差异: 以四川盆地焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406007.htm WEI Zhihong, WEI Xiangfeng. Comparison of gas-bearing property between different pore types of shale: a case from the Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Longmaxi Fms in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406007.htm
[40]	朱汉卿, 贾爱林, 位云生, 等. 昭通示范区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及吸附能力[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018, 25(4): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201804001.htm ZHU Hanqing, JIA Ailin, WEI Yunsheng, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore structure and methane adsorption capacity of shale in the Longmaxi Formation in the Zhaotong area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018, 25(4): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201804001.htm
[41]	谢佳彤, 付小平, 秦启荣, 等. 川东南东溪地区龙马溪组裂缝分布预测及页岩气保存条件评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(6): 35-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDKT202106004.htm XIE Jiatong, FU Xiaoping, QIN Qirong, et al. Prediction of fracture distribution and evaluation of shale gas preservation conditions in Longmaxi Formation in Dongxi area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(6): 35-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDKT202106004.htm
[42]	常德双, 韩冰, 朱斗星, 等. 燕山运动对页岩气保存条件的控制作用: 以滇黔北地区太阳—海坝区块龙马溪组页岩气为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(S1): 45-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2021S1007.htm CHANG Deshuang, HAN Bing, ZHU Douxing, et al. Control of Yanshanian movement on shale gas preservation conditions: a case study on the Longmaxi Formation shale gas in Taiyang-Haiba block of northern Yunnan and Guizhou[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(S1): 45-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2021S1007.htm
[43]	刘伟新, 卢龙飞, 叶德燎, 等. 川东南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气异常压力封存箱剖析与形成机制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 804-814. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205804 LIU Weixin, LU Longfei, YE Deliao, et al. Significance and formation mechanism of abnormally pressured compartments of shale gas in the Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi formations, south-eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 804-814. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205804
[44]	TANG Qingsong, ZHOU Lu, CHEN Lei, et al. Development characteristics of shale lithofacies in the Longmaxi Formation and their main controlling factors in the Changning area, south Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9: 775657.