Jiao Yangquan, Li Sitian. GEOLOGIC MODELING FOR OUTCROP RESERVOIR OF CONTINENTAL BASIN AND THE CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1998, 20(4): 346-353. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199804346
Citation: Jiao Yangquan, Li Sitian. GEOLOGIC MODELING FOR OUTCROP RESERVOIR OF CONTINENTAL BASIN AND THE CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1998, 20(4): 346-353. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199804346

GEOLOGIC MODELING FOR OUTCROP RESERVOIR OF CONTINENTAL BASIN AND THE CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS

doi: 10.11781/sysydz199804346
  • Received Date: 1997-10-15
  • Publish Date: 1998-10-25
  • The geologic modeling for outcrop reservoirs depends on the clarification of the characteristic heterogeneity of reservoirs,including the depositional heterogeneity,diagenetic heterogeneity,and the heterogeneity of porosity and permeability.The heterogeneity of resevoirs can be studied on three scales (macroscopic scale,mesoscopic scale and microscopic scale).From the study of depositional heterogeneity on different scales,the essential procedure is to model the internal architectural frame,for which it is significant to complement and improve the conceptual order for the internal architectural units and bounding surfaces.This paper indicates the common channel units in various channels,explains the differences of the internal architetural complexity and beddings for different channel sand bodies,and takes the different palaeocurrent energy and depositional modes as the major causes for the differences.Modeling the strong permeation net frame is based on recognition and differentiation of fluid flow units which are building blocks differentiated with isolate barrier beds as the bounding hydrodynamic conditions and are closely related with the internal architectural units of sand bodies in scales and spatial distribution.The study on the heterogeneity of reservoir porosity and permeability of different scales depends on different subjects,for instance,the study for mesoscopic scale is focused on the differences between fluid flow units and the differences between the reservoir lithological facies which formed the architectural units.Deposition significantly dominates the porosity and permeability of reservoirs,but in case of heterogeneous diagenesis in superposition,the integral porosity and permeability will greatly decrease.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    裘亦楠.储层沉积学研究工作流程.石油勘探与开发,1990,17(1):85~90.
    [2]
    Fisher W L,M cGowen J H.Depositional systems in the Wilcox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oil and gas.Trans.Gulf Coast Assoc.Gelo.Soc.,1967,17:105~125.
    [3]
    李思田.沉积体系分析的进展和层序地层学.见:李思田主编,含能源盆地沉积体系——中国内陆和近海主要沉积体系类型的典型分析.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1996:1~11.
    [4]
    Miall A D.Architectural elements analysis:a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits.Earth Science Review s,1985,22(4):261~308.
    [5]
    Mial l A D.Hierarchies of architectural units in terringen ous clastic rocks:a framework for the analysis of fluvial deposits.29th IGC Abstracts,Volume 2 of 3,Ⅲ-2-2,O-10,1993:293.
    [6]
    焦养泉,李祯.河道储层砂体中隔挡层的成因与分布规律.石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):78~81.
    [7]
    焦养泉,李思田,李祯等著.曲流河与湖泊三角洲沉积体系及典型骨架砂体内部构成分析.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1995:3~22.
    [8]
    焦养泉,李思田,杨士恭等.湖泊三角洲前缘砂体内部构成及不均一性露头研究.地球科学,1993,18(4):441~451.
    [9]
    李思田,焦养泉,付清平.鄂尔多斯盆地延安组三角洲砂体内部构成及非均质性研究.见:裘亦楠等主编:中国油气储层研究论文集(续一)。北京:石油工业出版社,1993:312~325.
    [10]
    焦养泉,卢宗盛.曲流河沉积体系内部构成和层次结构的典型分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地南缘柳林镇二马营组为例.见:李思田主编,含能源盆地沉积体系——中国内陆和近海主要沉积体系类型的典型分析.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1996:46~57.
    [11]
    焦养泉,李思田等.湖泊三角洲水下分流河道砂体储集性及储层地质模型研究.地学探索,1994,10:33~41
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (655) PDF downloads(377) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return