Xu Sihuang, Zhu Yiqing. WELL LOGS RESPONSE AND PREDICTION MODEL OF ORGANIC CARBON CONTENT IN SOURCE ROCKS-A CASE STUDY FROM THE SOURCE ROCK OF WENCHANG FORMATION IN THE PEARL MOUTH BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(3): 290-295. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201003290
Citation: Xu Sihuang, Zhu Yiqing. WELL LOGS RESPONSE AND PREDICTION MODEL OF ORGANIC CARBON CONTENT IN SOURCE ROCKS-A CASE STUDY FROM THE SOURCE ROCK OF WENCHANG FORMATION IN THE PEARL MOUTH BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(3): 290-295. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201003290

WELL LOGS RESPONSE AND PREDICTION MODEL OF ORGANIC CARBON CONTENT IN SOURCE ROCKS-A CASE STUDY FROM THE SOURCE ROCK OF WENCHANG FORMATION IN THE PEARL MOUTH BASIN

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201003290
  • Received Date: 2010-02-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2010-04-28
  • Publish Date: 2010-06-28
  • The evaluation of source rocks from well loggings can make up for the insufficiency of source rock core and discontinuity of samples examined.Organic-rich source rocks show relative increase in response to resistivity,neutron,sonic transit time and gamma loggings and decrease in response to density logs.Based on this response relationship,well logging data not only can be used to identify qualitatively source rocks from non-source rocks,but also predict quantificationally organic carbon content in source rocks.The predicting models proposed during past fifty years can be summed up as qualitative identification model,volume model,cross plot model,regression equation model,ΔlogR technique,and fuzzy model.The TOC of Wenchang Formation source rock in Huizhou Depression and Panyu 4 Sag in the Pearl River Mouth Basin shows similar degree of correlation respectively to resistivity,neutron,sonic transit time,gamma and density.So,the five variate regression equation should be the best prediction model for this study area.The organic carbon content of whole Wenchang Formation of one well in Panyu 4 sag predicted by this numerical model,and it shows good results verified by the lithological description and the TOC test of core samples in this well.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    PASSEY Q R,CREANEY S.A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(12):1777-1794.
    [2]
    闫建平.蔡进功,赵铭海,等.运用测井信息研究烃源岩进展及其资源评价意义[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(1):270-279.
    [3]
    BEERS R F.Radioactivity and organic content of some Paleozoic shales[J].AAPG Bulletin,1945,29(1):1-22.
    [4]
    SWANSON V E.Oil yield and uranium content of blank shales[M]//USGS Professional Paper 356-A.Reston,Virginia:USGS,1960:1-44.
    [5]
    FERTL W H,RIEKE H H.Gamma ray spectral evaluation techniques identify fractured shale reservoirs and source rock characteristics[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1980,31(11):2053-2062.
    [6]
    SCHMOKER J W.Determination of organic matter content of Appalachian Devonian shale from Gamma ray logs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1981,65(7):1285-1298.
    [7]
    谭廷栋.测井识别生油岩方法[J].测井技术,1988,12(6):1-12.
    [8]
    SCHMOKER J W.Determination of organic content of Appalachian Devonian shales from formation-density logs[J].AAPG Bulletin.1979,63(9):1504-1537.
    [9]
    SCHMOKER J W,HESTER T C.Organic carbon in Bakken formation,United States Portion of Williston Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1983,67(12):2165-2174.
    [10]
    DELLENBACH J,ESPITALIE J,LEBRETON F F.Source rock logging[C]//Transactions of 8th European SPWLA Symposium.London:[s.n.],1983:paper D.
    [11]
    AUTRIC A.Resistivity,radioactivity,and sonic transit time logs to evaluate the organic content of low permeability rocks[J].The Log Analyst,1985,26(3):36-45.
    [12]
    赵彦超.生油岩测井评价的理论和实践:以南阳、泌阳凹陷为例[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,1990,15(1):65-74.
    [13]
    MEYER B L,NEDERLOF M H.Identification of source rocks on wireline logs by density/resistivity and sonic transit time/resistivity crossplots[J].AAPG Bulletin,1984,68(2):121-129.
    [14]
    HERRON S L.A total organic log for source rock evaluation[J].The Log Analyst,1981,28(6):520-527.
    [15]
    PATTERSON C D,QUARLES C A,BREYER J A.Possible new well-logging tool using positron Doppler broadening to detect total organic carbon(TOC)in hydrocarbon source rocks[J].Radiation Physics and Chemistry,2003,68:523-526.
    [16]
    MURRAY G H.Quantitative fracture study:Sanish pool,McKenzie County,North Dakota[J].AAPG Bulletin,1968,52(1):57-65.
    [17]
    MEISSNER F F.Petroleum geology of the Bakken formation Williston basin,North Dakota and Montana[C]//REHRIG D,ed.The economic geology of the Williston basin:Proceedings of the Montana Geological Society,24th Annual Conference,1978:207-227.
    [18]
    FERTL W H,CHILINGAR G V.Total organic carbon content determined from wall logs[J].SPE,1988:407-419.
    [19]
    刘新颖,邓宏文,邸永香,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷南屯组优质烃源岩发育特征[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(1):68-73.
    [20]
    KAMALI M R,MIRSHADY A A.Total organic carbon content determined from well logs using AlogR and neuro fuzzy techniques[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2004,(45):141-148.
    [21]
    朱振宇,刘洪,李幼铭.ΔlogR技术在烃源岩识别中的应用与分析[J].地球物理学进展,2003,18(4):647-649.
    [22]
    HUANG Z,WILLIAMSON M A.Artificial neural network modelling as an aid to source rock characterization[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1996,13(2):277-290.
    [23]
    朱振宇,王贵文,朱广宇.人工神经网络法在烃源岩测井评价中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(1):137-140.
    [24]
    ANDREAS P,AGTERBERG F P.Wavelet analysis of welllogging data from oil source rock,Egret Member,offshore eastern Canada[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000,84(10):1617-1632.
    [25]
    于水明,施和生,梅廉夫,等.过渡动力学背景下的张扭性断陷:以珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近纪断陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(5):485-489.
    [26]
    施和生,朱俊章,姜正龙,等.珠江口盆地珠-坳陷油气资源再评价[J].中国海上油气,2009,21(1):9-14.
    [27]
    姜华,王华,李俊良.等.珠江口盆地珠三坳陷断层特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(5):460-466.
    [28]
    朱俊章,施和生,舒誉,等.珠江口盆地烃源岩有机显微组分特征与生烃潜力分析[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(3):301-306.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1856) PDF downloads(1387) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return