Qin Weijun, Fu Zhaohui. Improving evaluation of predicted hydrocarbon reserve zones[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(1): 117-123. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201501117
Citation: Qin Weijun, Fu Zhaohui. Improving evaluation of predicted hydrocarbon reserve zones[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(1): 117-123. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201501117

Improving evaluation of predicted hydrocarbon reserve zones

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201501117
  • Received Date: 2014-05-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-12-25
  • Publish Date: 2015-01-28
  • Predicted hydrocarbon reserves were studied, and four evaluation methods for improving reserve estimates were proposed, including possibility evaluation, upgrading rate evaluation, economic evaluation and comprehensive evaluation. A difficulty index was used to evaluate the possibility of reserve upgrading. Reserve upgrading probability calculation and test were used to evaluate the upgrading rate. A discounted cash flow method was applied in the economic evaluation. The difficulty index, probability calculation and economic methods were jointly used in the comprehensive evaluation. The predicted hydrocarbon reserve blocks were classified into four types according to the comprehensive evaluation, including the blocks with large or medium potential for upgrading, the blocks with medium or small potential for upgrading, the blocks remaining for evaluation, and the blocks not to upgrade at present.

     

  • [1]
    GB/T 19492-2004石油天然气资源/储量分类[S].北京:国家质量技术监督局,2004:1-6. GB/T 19492-2004 Petroleum and natural gas resources/reserves division[S].Beijing:State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision,2004:1-6.
    [2]
    中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准 SY/T5520-1996 圈闭评价技术规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1996. Petroleum and natural gas industry standards of People's Republic of China SY/T5520-1996 Technical specification for trap evaluation[S].Beijing:China Standardization Press,1996.
    [3]
    郭元岭.油气勘探发展基本规律[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(1):72-75. Guo Yuanling.Basic regularity of petroleum exploration development[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(1):72-75.
    [4]
    陈元千,郝明强,李飞.油气资源量评估方法的对比与评论[J].断块油气田,2013,20(4):447-453. Chen Yuanqian,Hao Mingqiang,Li Fei.Comparison and review of estimating methods of oil and gas resources[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2013,20(4):447-453.
    [5]
    康永尚,刁顺,陈安霞,等.中外油气资源分类体系对比和资源潜力概念探讨[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(1):66-73. Kang Yongshang,Diao Shun,Chen Anxia,et al.Comparison of domestic and foreign petroleum resource classification systems and discussion on resource potential concepts[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(1):66-73.
    [6]
    中华人民共和国地质矿产行业标准 DZ/T0217-2005 石油天然气储量计算规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005. Geological mineral industry standard DZ/T0217-2005 of People's Republic of China,Specification for calculating oil and gas reserves[S].Beijing:China Standardization Press,2005.
    [7]
    金之钧,张金川.油气资源评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999. Jin Zhijun,Zhang Jinchuan.Oil and gas resource evaluation technology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Publishing House,1999.
    [8]
    魏萍,张玲,翟中喜,等.SEC石油储量替代率预测方法探讨[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(6):702-706. Wei Ping,Zhang Ling,Zhai Zhongxi,et al.Forecasting methods of SEC reserves replacement rate[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(6):702-706.
    [9]
    张付兴.SEC剩余经济可采储量影响因素分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(3):95-97. Zhang Fuxing.Analysis on influencing factors of SEC reserves evaluation[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(3):95-97.
    [10]
    卢广钦.SEC剩余经济可采储量替代率与产量的关系及影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(3):60-64. Lu Guangqin.Study on the relationship and influencing factors of replacement ratio and output on SEC remaining economic reco-verable reserves[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(3):60-64.
    [11]
    黄学斌,魏萍,郭鸣黎,等.SEC储量成本指标计算方法探讨[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(4):506-510. Huang Xuebin,Wei Ping,Guo Mingli,et al.Discussion of cost index calculation method on SEC reserves[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(4):506-510.
    [12]
    衣艳静,鲁兵,原瑞娥,等.国际合作项目SEC储量评估特点及面临的问题[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(1):7-11. Yi Yanjing, Lu Bing, Yuan Ruie, et al.Features of SEC reserves estimation and existing problems in international cooperation projects [J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2014,21(1):7-11.
    [13]
    Robert M O,Nahum S.A process for evaluting exploration prospects[J].AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(7):1087-1109.
    [14]
    Rose P R.Risk analysis and management of petroleum exploration ventures[M].Tulsa: AAPG,2001.
    [15]
    郭秋麟,米石云.油气勘探目标评价与决策分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004. Guo Qiulin,Mi Shiyun.Assesment of petroleum exploration target and exploration decisions[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004.
    [16]
    宋建国,张光亚.勘探目标评价方法[J].世界石油工业,1998,5(8):10-14. Song Jianguo, Zhang Guangya. Exploration target evaluation me-thod[J].Petroleum Industry in the World,1998,5(8):10-14.
    [17]
    李伟,鲁雪松,柳少波,等.随机模拟在油气资源评价中的应用[J].断块油气田,2013,20(4):443-446. Li Wei,Lu Xuesong,Liu Shaobo,et al.Application of stochastic simulation in oil and gas resources assessment[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2013,20(4):443-446.
    [18]
    White D A.Geologic risking guide for prospect and palys[J].AAPG Bulletin,1993,77(12):2048-2061.
    [19]
    方小东,郭元岭,胡兴中.油气勘探状态评价新方法[J].河南石油,2005,19(6):6-8. Fang Xiaodong,Guo Yuanling,Hu Xingzhong.New evaluationmethod of petroleum exploration[J].Henan Petroleum,2005,19(6):6-8.
    [20]
    邴绍献.油田单井可采储量定量预测模型[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(1):85-88. Bing Shaoxian.Quantitative forecasting model for recoverable reserves of single well[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(1):85-88.
    [21]
    徐桂华,伍松柏,杨万芹,等.成熟探区探井"出油点"资源潜力分析[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(1):56-58. Xu Guihua,Wu Songbo,Yang Wanqin,et al.Analysis of potential resources of the "Oil Seepage Points" in exploration wells of mature exploration area [J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2014,21(1):56-58.
    [22]
    中国石油天然气总公司计划局及中国石油天然气总公司规划设计院.石油工业建设项目经济评价方法与参数[M].2版.北京:石油工业出版社,1994:1-88. China National Petroleum Company and China National Petro-leum Company Planning Bureau of Planning and Design Institute.Risk analysis on oil and gas resources evaluation method discussion[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Publishing House,1994:1-88.
    [23]
    周总瑛,唐跃刚.油气资源评价中风险分析方法探讨[J].长江大学学报:社会科学版,2004,27(1):108-111. Zhou Zongying,Tang Yuegang.A discussion on method of risk analysis for oil and gas resources evaluation[J].Yangtze University:Social Sciences,2004,27(1):108-111.
    [24]
    王强,徐立恒,陈践发.川东北地区大中型气藏天然气特征及气源[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(6):867-872. Wang Qiang,Xu Liheng,Chen Jianfa.Characteristics and origin of natural gas in large-and medium-sized gas reservoirs in northeast Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(6):867-872.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HU Hongjin, LI Denghua, ZHAO Kai, JIANG Wenli, ZHENG Zhihong, GAO Yang, ZAN Xin, JIANG Hang, JIA Jun, GAO Xuan. Relationship among oil and gas resources, reserves and production in China and suggestions for the development direction of national oil and gas resource assessment[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 222-228. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302222
    [2]FAN Yumei. Evaluation method for uncertain potential of undeveloped reserves[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(6): 1100-1104. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2022061100
    [3]HU Yan. Evaluation methods for oil reserve upgrading[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(3): 530-534. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202203530
    [4]MAO Yi. Transfer system reform for oil and gas mineral rights and value of reserves in China[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 728-736. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104728
    [5]LI Shu, HUANG Xuebin, XIAO Yuru, ZHENG Zhenheng, LIU Liqiong. Controlled reserve upgrade standard for middle-deep low permeability glutenite reservoirs in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(1): 184-192. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101184
    [6]XIAO Yuru, HUANG Xuebin, LI Shu, LIU Liqiong, LI Jun. A method for evaluating the potential of reserve upgrading based on quantitative uncertainty[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(1): 169-175. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101169
    [7]SHI Lei, HUANG Xuebin, LIU Jingliang, ZHANG Lian, ZHUANG Li, ZHANG Fengdong. Evaluation of upgrading potential and strategy for inferred initially in-place petroleum[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(1): 176-183. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101176
    [8]WANG Mingchuan, SHANG Xiaofei, DUAN Taizhong, GAO Weiyuan. Reserves evaluation for new investment projects in overseas oil and gas field development[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(2): 296-301. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002296
    [9]Chen Ping, Zhang Ling, Wang Huimin. Reserves growth trend and potential analysis of Junggar Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(1): 124-128. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201501124
    [10]Xie Yinfu, Chen Heping, Ma Zhongzhen, Zhou Yubing, Liu Yaming, Wang Renchong, Liu Suyan. Probabilistic estimation of reserves and difference between probabilistic and determine methods[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(1): 117-122. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201401117
    [11]Wei Ping, Zhang Ling, Zhai Zhongxi, Xiao Xizhen, Guo Mingli. Forecasting methods of SEC reserves replacement rate[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(6): 702-706. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201306702
    [12]Liu Lin, Jin Zhongkang, Pan Xuefeng. Parameters of index diminishing method in SEC standard evaluation of oil and gas reserves[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2012, 34(5): 522-526. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201205522
    [13]Wang Daiguo. Problem and countermeasure of reserve estimation and calculation of tight lithologic gas reservoir:A case study in Upper Paleozoic gas reservoir in Daniudi Gas Field of Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2012, 34(5): 495-498. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201205495
    [14]Wang Shuhua, Xu Jinghua. Evaluation and study of recovery rate prediction method for newly-proved reserves[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2012, 34(5): 490-494. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201205490
    [15]Qian Qin, Feng Minggang, Peng Jin, Li Shurong, Wang Yan. Application of fine logging interpretation in reserve calculation, Puguang Gas Field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2012, 34(5): 543-548. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201205543
    [16]He Li, Liu Liping, Luo Xiao, Lü Zhizhou, Wang Yingrong. NAPPE STRUCTURE CHARACTERISTICS AND EXPLORATION POTENTIAL FORECAST IN LONGMENSHAN, THE WEST OF SICHUAN PROVINCE[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2007, 29(3): 247-252. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200703247
    [17]Zhang Dajing, Miao Li, Bai Senshu. PETROLEUM RESERVES CALCULATION IN CARBONATE FORMATIONS METHOD USING RESERVOIR CONTROLLED UNIT COEFFICIENTS[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2005, 27(6): 635-639. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200506635
    [18]Zeng Yi. A NEW METHOD OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES ESTIMATION:FRACTAL METHOD[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1998, 20(2): 152-154. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199802152
    [19]Wei Liling, Fan Zhengjun, Wang Qian, Jin Yizhi. AN APPLICATON OF WELL LOGGING INTERPRETATION OF CARBONATE ROCKS IN THE CALCULATION OF RESERVES OF THE NORTHERN TARIM[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1995, 17(4): 367-371. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199504367
    [20]Jin Qiang, Wang Weifeng, Xin Quanlin. RESERVOIR EVALUATION AND PETROLEUM RESERVE ESTIMATION BY MULTIPLE WELL—LOGGINGS[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1994, 16(2): 152-156. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199402152
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-032025-042025-0505101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.5 %FULLTEXT: 23.5 %META: 75.0 %META: 75.0 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.2 %其他: 3.2 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %丽水: 0.3 %丽水: 0.3 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南平: 0.2 %南平: 0.2 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %大庆: 0.5 %大庆: 0.5 %巴音郭楞: 0.2 %巴音郭楞: 0.2 %张家口: 4.1 %张家口: 4.1 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %杭州: 3.5 %杭州: 3.5 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %沙巴州: 0.2 %沙巴州: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 42.9 %芒廷维尤: 42.9 %莫斯科: 0.5 %莫斯科: 0.5 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 34.9 %西宁: 34.9 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaIndia[]上海丽水北京南京南平台州哥伦布大庆巴音郭楞张家口成都杭州武汉沙巴州济南淄博湖州漯河盘锦芒廷维尤莫斯科衢州西宁贵阳遵义郑州金华长春长沙阿什本

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1360) PDF downloads(1032) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return