Advanced Search
Volume 37 Issue 5
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2015  >  37(5): 541-547
Xie Yuhong, Zhang Ya, Zhang Shaonan, Zhang Yingzhao, Liu Jinghuan. Structural characteristics of micro-pores and factors controlling low-permeability reservoirs in the Huangliu Formation in the Dongfang area, Yinggehai Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(5): 541-547. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505541
Citation: Xie Yuhong, Zhang Ya, Zhang Shaonan, Zhang Yingzhao, Liu Jinghuan. Structural characteristics of micro-pores and factors controlling low-permeability reservoirs in the Huangliu Formation in the Dongfang area, Yinggehai Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(5): 541-547. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505541
shu

Structural characteristics of micro-pores and factors controlling low-permeability reservoirs in the Huangliu Formation in the Dongfang area, Yinggehai Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505541
  • 1.

    Zhanjiang Branch of CNOOC, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524057, China

  • 2. Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas ReservoirGeology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

  • 4. College of Earth Science and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

  • Received Date: 2014-08-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-08-07
  • Publish Date: 2015-09-28
    Abstract
  • Characteristics of micro-pore structures and factors controlling the low-permeability reservoirs in the Huangliu Formation in the Dongfang area of the Yinggehai Basin were studied by mercury injection experiments with constant rates.The average pore radius of the reservoirs is about 100-140 μm, the average throat radius is about 1-5 μm, and the mainstream throat radius is less than 5 μm.The permeability is not correlated with pore radius, and reservoirs with different permeabilities can have similar pore radius distributions.In contrast, permeability is strongly associated with throat radius and its distribution.The throat radius and the mainstream throat radius decrease as permeability becomes lower, and the distribution range gets narrower.The throat to pore ratio increases as permeability decreases, and its distribution range becomes wider.The low permeability of rocks in the study area can be explained by their small throat radius.Strong compaction effects and authigenic clay minerals are the main factors which undermine the micro-pore structures and make the permeability low.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(25)
  • [1]
    国家能源局.SY/T6832-2011中华人民共和国石油和天然气行业标准:致密砂岩气地质评价方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2011.National Energy Administration.SY/T6832-2011 Petroleum and natural gas industry standard:Geological evaluating methods for tight sandstone gas[S].Beijing:Petroleun Industry Press,2011.
    [2]
    杨晓萍,赵文智,邹才能,等.低渗透储层成因机理及优质储层形成与分布[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):57-61.Yang Xiaoping,Zhao Wenzhi,Zou Caineng,et al.Origin of low-permeability reservoir and distribution of favorable reservoir[J].Acta Prteolei Sinica,2007,28(4):57-61.
    [3]
    蒋凌志,顾家裕,郭彬程.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩低渗透储层的特征及形成机理[J].沉积学报,2004,22(1):13-18.Jiang Lingzhi,Gu Jiayu,Guo Bincheng.Characteristics and mech-anism of low-permeability clastic reservoir in Chinese petroliferous basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2004,22(1):13-18.
    [4]
    伍小玉,罗明高,聂振荣,等.恒速压汞技术在储层孔隙结构特征研究中的应用:以克拉玛依油田七中区及七东区克下组油藏为例[J].天然气勘探与开发,2012,35(3):28-30.Wu Xiaoyu,Luo Minggao,Nie Zhenrong,et al.Application of constant-velocity mercury-injection technology to studying porous structure of reservoir: an example from Kexia Formation in 7 Middle and East areas of Karamay Oilfield[J].Natural Gas Exploration & Development,2012,35(3):28-30.
    [5]
    高煜婷.莺歌海盆地成岩作用研究与孔隙演化[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2011.Gao Yuting.Diagenesis research and pore evolution in Yinggehai Basin[D].Daqing:University of Northeast Petroleum,2011.
    [6]
    姜涛,解习农.莺歌海盆地高温超压环境下储层物性影响因素[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2005,30(2):215-220.Jiang Tao,Xie Xinong.Effects of high temperature and overpressure on reservoir quality in the Yinggehai Basin,South China Sea[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2005,30(2):215-220.
    [7]
    Tingay M R P,Hillis R R,Swarbrick R E,et al.Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(1):51-74.
    [8]
    唐海发,彭仕宓,赵彦超.大牛地气田盒2+3段致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类评价[J].矿物岩石,2006,26(3):107-113.Tang Haifa,Peng Shimi,Zhao Yanchao.Characteristics of pore structure and reservoir evolution in H2+3 tight gas reservoir, Daniudi gas field[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2006,26(3):107-113.
    [9]
    孙军昌,杨正明,肖前华.恒速压汞实验技术发展历史及其在油气田开发中的应用[J].渗流力学进展,2011,1(1):1-7.Sun Junchang,Yang Zhengming,Xiao Qianhua.The history of constant-rate mercury injection technology and its application on the development of petroleum fields[J].Advances in Porous Flow,2011,1(1):1-7.
    [10]
    李彦举.基于恒速压汞的孔隙结构特征研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014.Li Yanju.Study on pore structure characteristics based on constant-rate mercury injection[D].Beijing:China University of Geoscience (Beijing),2014.
    [11]
    师调调,孙卫,何生平.低渗透储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体饱和度关系研究[J].地质科技情报,2012,31(4):81-85.Shi Tiaotiao,Sun Wei,He Shengping.Relationship between micro-pore structure and movable fluid saturation in low permeability reservoir[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2012,31(4):81-85.
    [12]
    陈蒲礼,王烁,王丹,等.恒速压汞法与常规压汞法的优越性比较[J].新疆地质,2013,31(S1):139-141.Chen Puli,Wang Shuo,Wang Dan,et al.Comparing the constant-speed mercury injection technique with the conventional mercury injection technique[J].Xinjiang Geology,2013,31(S1):139-141.
    [13]
    蔡玥,赵乐,肖淑萍,等.基于恒速压汞的特低—超低渗透储层孔隙结构特征研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地富县探区长3油层组为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(1):32-35.Cai Yue,Zhao Le,Xiao Shuping,et al.Study on pore structure characteristics of super-low permeability and ultra-low permeability reservoir by means of constant-speed mercury injection technique:case of oil layers of Chang 3 of the Yanchang Formation in Fuxian exploration area of the Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(1):32-35.
    [14]
    李珊,孙卫,王力,等.恒速压汞技术在储层孔隙结构研究中的应用[J].断块油气田,2013,20(4):485-487.Li Shan,Sun Wei,Wang Li,et al.Application of constant-rate mercury injection technology in reservoir pore structure study[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2013,20(4):485-487.
    [15]
    朱春俊,王延斌.大牛地气田低渗储层成因及评价[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(1):49-56.Zhu Chunjun,Wang Yanbin.Reservior genesis and evaluation for the low porosity and permeability sandstone in the Daniudi gasfield[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2011,33(1):49-56.
    [16]
    张琴,唐玄,庞正炼.鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗探区二叠系低孔渗储层主控因素分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2011,30(3):45-50.Zhang Qin,Tang Xuan,Pang Zhenglian.Main controlling-factor analysis of Permian low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in Hangjinqi exploration area in Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2011,30(3):45-50.
    [17]
    Amthor J E,Okkerman J.Influence of early diagenesis on reservoir quality of Rotliegende sandstones, northern Netherlands[J].AAPG Bulletin,1998,82(12):2246-2265.
    [18]
    Beard D C,Weyl P K.Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J].AAPG Bulletin,1973,57(2):349-369.
    [19]
    姚雅琴,寇海亮.莺歌海盆地超压流体对储层物性的影响[J].内蒙古石油化工,2010(6):121-124.Yao Yaqin,Kou Hailiang.Effect of overpressure liquid on the reservoir property in Yinggehai Basin[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical,2010(6):121-124.
    [20]
    梁建设,王琪,郝乐伟,等.成岩相分析方法在南海北部深水区储层预测的应用:以珠江口盆地白云凹陷为例[J].沉积学报,2011,29(3):503-511.Liang Jianshe,Wang Qi,Hao Lewei,et al.Application of diagenetic facies analysisto reservoir prediction in deep water area of the northern south China sea: A case study from Baiyun Sag, Zhujiangkou Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2011,29(3):503-511.
    [21]
    黄思静,孙伟,黄培培,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部太原组碎屑岩中自生伊利石形成机制及其对储层形成的影响[J].矿物岩石,2009,29(4):25-32.Huang Sijing,Sun Wei,Huang Peipei,et al.The origin of authigenic illite and its effects on reservoir quality:A case study from Taiyuan sandstone,eastern Ordos basin[J].Journal of Mineralogy Petrology,2009,29(4):25-32.
    [22]
    王行信.泥岩中碎屑高岭石的分布及其在沉积环境研究中的意义[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1983,2(1):1-6.Wang Xingxin.The distribution of clastic kaolinite in mudstone and its significance in the study of sedimentary environment[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,1983,2(1):1-6.
    [23]
    张惠良,张荣虎,王月华,等.粘土膜对砂岩储集性能的影响:以塔里木盆地群6井区泥盆系东河塘组下段为例[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(5):493-498.Zhang Huiliang,Zhang Ronghu,Wang Yuehua,et al.Influence of clay minerals membrane on sandstone reservoirs:A case study on the lower Donghetang reservoirs of the Devonian of well Qun 6 in the Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2006,28(5):493-498.
    [24]
    张哨楠,丁晓琪,万友利,等.致密碎屑岩中粘土矿物的形成机理与分布规律[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,34(3):174-182.Zhang Shaonan,Ding Xiaoqi,Wan Youli,et al.Formation mechanism and distribution of clay minerals of deeply tight siliciclastic reservoirs[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2012,34(3):174-182.
    [25]
    宋丽红,朱如凯,朱德升,等.粘土矿物对广安须家河组致密砂岩物性影响[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(2):73-78.Song Lihong,Zhu Rukai,Zhu Desheng,et al.Influences of clay minerals on physical properties of tight sandstones of Xujiahe formation in Guang'an area[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2011,33(2):73-78.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1025) PDF downloads(1411) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return