Nie Minglong, Tong Xiaoguang, Liu Qunming, Xu Shubao, Wu Lei, Chen Xiaoshuai, Zhuo Xizhun. Types of pre-salt carbonate gas reservoirs and hydrocarbon enrichment factors of Amu Darya right bank area in Turkmenistan[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(1): 70-75. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201601070
Citation: Nie Minglong, Tong Xiaoguang, Liu Qunming, Xu Shubao, Wu Lei, Chen Xiaoshuai, Zhuo Xizhun. Types of pre-salt carbonate gas reservoirs and hydrocarbon enrichment factors of Amu Darya right bank area in Turkmenistan[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(1): 70-75. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201601070

Types of pre-salt carbonate gas reservoirs and hydrocarbon enrichment factors of Amu Darya right bank area in Turkmenistan

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201601070
  • Received Date: 2015-01-23
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-12-11
  • Publish Date: 2016-01-28
  • Hydrocarbon resources in the Middle-Upper Jurassic Callovian-Oxfordian carbonate rocks are abundant; however, research on the distribution law of hydrocarbon is relatively backward. Through the study of typical gas reservoirs, analysis of the type of hydrocarbon reservoirs and discussion of the major reasons for high hydrocarbon output, we determined that there are three main types of pre-salt gas reservoirs in carbonate rocks:structural, lithologic and structural-lithologic compound gas reservoirs. Additionally, there are five minor gas reservoirs:anticline, faulted anticline, thrust faulted anticline, reefs and structural-lithologic gas reservoirs. We also discovered that Hercynian basement paleo-uplift controlled the formation of large gas fields and Himalayan extruded tectonic movement formed thrust faulted hydrocarbon accumulation zones. The abundance of gas was controlled by sedimentary facies belts and good seal provided by salt-gypsum cover contributing to the formation of faulted anticline gas reservoirs. The coincidence of large anticline structures and high energy reef beach body was the major controlling factor for the enrichment of natural gas in the west Zarzhu terrace. The coincidence of thrust faulted anticlinal structural traps and large scale fissure type reservoirs is the main reason for the enrichment and high yield of natural gas in the east Bieshikent Depression and Jisaer folded uplift zone.

     

  • [1]
    Warren J K.Evaporites:sediments,resources and hydrocarbons[M].Berlin:Springer,2006:1052.
    [2]
    郭永强,刘洛夫,朱胜利,等.阿姆达林盆地含油气系统划分与评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(4):515-520. Guo Yongqiang,Liu Luofu,Zhu Shengli,et al.Classification and assessment of petroleum system in Amu-Daria Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(4):515-520.
    [3]
    李浩武,童晓光,王素花,等.阿姆河盆地侏罗系成藏组合地质特征及勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2010,30(5):6-12. Li Haowu,Tong Xiaoguang,Wang Suhua,et al.An analysis of geological characteristics and exploration potential of the Jurassic play,Amu Darya Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(5):6-12.
    [4]
    费怀义,徐刚,王强,等.阿姆河右岸区块气藏特征[J].天然气工业,2010,30(5):13-17. Fei Huaiyi,Xu Gang,Wang Qiang,et al.Characteristics of gas reservoirs in the Amu Darya Right Bank Block,Turkmenistan[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(5):13-17.
    [5]
    徐剑良,程绪彬,吴蕾,等.阿姆河右岸区块构造演化与成藏条件[J].天然气工业,2010,30(5):18-20. Xu Jianliang,Cheng Xubin,Wu Lei,et al.Structural evolution and hydrocarbon pooling conditions in the Amu Darya Right Bank Block,Turkmenistan[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(5):18-20.
    [6]
    刘洛夫,朱毅秀.滨里海盆地及中亚地区油气地质特征[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2007:18-38. Liu Luofu,Zhu Yixiu.Characteristics of petroleum geology in Caspian Basin and central Asiaarea[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2007:18-38.
    [7]
    徐树宝,胡见义,李晋超,等.中俄土天然气地质研究新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:126-137. Xu Shubao,Hu Jianyi,Li Jinchao,et al.China and Russia soil gas geological research progress[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1995:126-137.
    [8]
    方杰,徐树宝,吴蕾,等.阿姆河右岸地区侏罗系海相烃源岩生烃潜力[J].海相油气地质,2014,19(1):8-18. Fang Jie,Xu Shubao,Wu Lei,et al.Hydrocarbon generation potential of Jurassic source rocks in right bank of Amu Darya[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2014,19(1):8-18.
    [9]
    白国平,殷进垠.中亚卡拉库姆盆地油气分布特征与成藏模式[J].古地理学报,2007,9(3):293-301. Bai Guoping,Yin Jinyin.Distribution characteristics and accumulation model for oil and gas in Karakum Basin, Central Asia[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2007,9(3):293-301.
    [10]
    聂明龙,吴蕾,孙林,等.阿姆河盆地查尔朱阶地及邻区盐相关断裂特征与油气地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,34(6):803-808. Nie Minglong,Wu Lei,Sun Lin,et al.Salt-related fault characteristics and their petroleum geological significance in Zarzhu terrace and its adjacent areas,the Amu Darya Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,34(6):803-808.
    [11]
    Zheng Rongcai,Li Yun,Wu Lei,et al.Geochemical characteristics of Callovian-Oxfordian carbonates in Samandepe gas field,Amu Darya Basin,Turkmenistan[J].Petroleum Science,2011,8(4):371-381]
    [12]
    郑荣才,陈浩如,王强,等.土库曼斯坦阿姆河盆地卡洛夫-牛津阶储层特征及控制因素分析[J].岩石学报,2014,30(3):779-788. Zheng Rongcai,Chen Haoru,Wang Qiang,et al.The reservoir characteristics and their controlling factors of Callovian-Oxfor-dian carbonates in Amu Darya Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2014,30(3):779-788.
    [13]
    徐文礼,郑荣才,费怀义,等.土库曼斯坦阿姆河盆地卡洛夫-牛津阶沉积相特征[J].中国地质,2012,39(4):954-964. Xu Wenli,Zheng Rongcai,Fei Huaiyi,et al.The sedimentary facies of Callovian-Oxfordian Stage in Amu Darya basin,Turk-menistan[J].Geology in China,2012,39(4):954-964.
    [14]
    张兵,郑荣才,刘合年,等.土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田卡洛夫阶-牛津阶碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].地质学报,2010,84(1):117-126. Zhang Bing,Zheng Rongcai,Liu Henian,et al.Characteristics of carbonate reservoir in Callovian-Oxfordian of Samandepe Gasfield,Turkmenistan[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2010,84(1):117-126.
    [15]
    Robert A M M,Letouzey J,Kavoosi M A,et al.Structural evolution of the Kopeh Dagh fold-and-thrust belt (NE Iran) and interactions with the South Caspian Sea Basin and Amu Darya Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2014,57:68-87.
    [16]
    徐文世,刘秀联,余志清,等.中亚阿姆河含油气盆地构造特征[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(5):744-748. Xu Wenshi,Liu Xiulian,Yu Zhiqing,et al.Geological structure of Amu-Darya Basin in central Asia[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(5):744-748.
    [17]
    张志伟,何永垚,王春生,等.中亚地区阿姆河盆地查尔朱、布哈拉阶地构造特征及演化[J].海相油气地质,2010,15(4):48-56. Zhang Zhiwei,He Yongyao,Wang Chunsheng,et al.Structural characteristics and evolution of Chardzhou and Bukhara Terraces in Amu-Darya Basin,middle Asia[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2010,15(4):48-56.
    [18]
    聂明龙,吴蕾,徐树宝,等.阿姆河盆地别什肯特坳陷及其邻区构造成因与勘探意义[J].天然气工业,2013,33(11):45-50. Nie Minglong,Wu Lei,Xu Shubao,et al.Genetic mechanism and exploration significance of tectonic action in the Bieshikent Depre-ssion and its adjacent area in the Amu-Darya Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(11):45-50.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Xipeng, WANG Kaiming, LUO Wei, GAO Yuqiao, LIU Nana, GUO Tao, ZHOU Yatong, WU Didi. Geological characteristics and main enrichment controlling factors of coalbed methane in Nanchuan area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2025, 47(1): 64-76. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025010064
    [2]GUO Xiaojiao, WANG Lei, YAO Xianzhou, LI Xu, ZHANG Linke, WANG Xiaoshuang. Geological characteristics of deep coal rock and main geological factors controlling coalbed methane enrichment: a case study of the M area in the eastern Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2025, 47(1): 17-26. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025010017
    [3]LIU Li, ZHANG Kaixun, YU Gang, YU Linjun, QIU Haihua, ZHOU Yan, GE Beiqi, NURTAEV Bakhtier, SHUKUROV Shukhrat. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors of major salt-bearing basins in Central Asia[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2025, 47(2): 336-346. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025020336
    [4]QI Wen, CHEN Feng, FANG Peng, ZHANG Bin, GAO Shuo, HONG Zhibin, ZHANG Ping, WU Jia. The essence of gypsum's influence on Tmax of source rocks: a case study of the Lower Ganchaigou Formation of Paleogene in western Qaidam Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(3): 497-503. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303497
    [5]LI Longlong, LUO Kaiping, LIU Xu, ZHANG Changjiang, CAO Qinggu, LU Yongde, PENG Jinning. Controlling effect of Late Paleozoic tectonic and sedimentary differentiation on multi-type gas reservoirs in Permian, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(1): 60-71. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301060
    [6]HUA Zuxian, LIU Xiaoping, SUN Biao, LIU Tian, LIU Jie, LIU Qidong, LIU Shili, BI Tianzhuo. Differences in oil and gas enrichment in slope belts of rift basins and main controlling factors for hydrocarbon accumulation: a case study of Sanhe Sub-sag in Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(6): 950-958. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206950
    [7]FAN Qi, FAN Tailiang, LI Qingping, DU Yang, ZHANG Yan, YUAN Yaxuan. Sedimentary characteristics and development model of Cambrian gypsum-salt rocks, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(2): 217-226. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102217
    [8]ZHU Tong. Main controlling factors and types of continental shale oil and gas enrichment in Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003345
    [9]WU Nazhu. Sequence stratigraphy and reef beach distribution of Feixianguan Formation in western Hubei-eastern Chongqing area: a case study of the third member of Feixianguan Formation in Jiannan and adjacent area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(4): 524-529. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904524
    [10]ZHANG Junlong, FENG Zihui, LI Qiang, ZHANG Bin. Evolution of Cambrian mound-beach gas reservoirs in Gucheng platform margin zone, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(5): 655-661. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805655
    [11]Yu Yixin, Yin Jinyin, Zheng Junzhang, Li Feng, Wang Zhen, Xu Xiaolong, Wu Hang. Hydrocarbon accumulation and favorable objectives in the Amu Darya Basin, central Asia[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(6): 758-763. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201506758
    [12]Fan Xiaojun. Genetic analysis of high-yield wells of ultra-deep reef-shoal lithologic gas reservoirs:A case study of reef-shoal facies reservoirs in Changxing Formation, Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(1): 70-76. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201401070
    [13]She Xiaoyu, Dong Zheng, Gong Xiaoxing, Jiao Libo, Tang Tingting, Li Changhong. Seismic identification and reservoir prediction of reef flat of Upper Ordovician in northern and southern slopes of Katake Uplift, middle Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(1): 16-24. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201401016
    [14]Xiong Liping, Wu Changwu, Guo Yongqiang, Li Songyang. Petroleum accumulation characteristics in Campos and Santos Basins, offshore Brazil[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(4): 419-425. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201304419
    [15]Yin Zhengwu, Fan Rui, Chen Zuqing, Duan Jinbao, Deng Ping. Delineation of gas-bearing area of lithologic gas reservoir in organic beach reef:A case study in Changxing Formation, Yuanba Gas Field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2012, 34(5): 499-505. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201205499
    [16]Fu Xiaofei, Song Yan, Lü Yangfang, Sun Yonghe. ROCK MECHANIC CHARACTERISTICS OF GYPSUM COVER AND CONSERVATION FUNCTION TO GAS IN THE KUCHE DEPRESSION, THE TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2006, 28(1): 25-29. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200601025
    [17]TAN Li-juan, JIANG You-lu. POOL-FORMING PATTERNS OF HYDROCARBON AND CONTROLLING FACTORS OF HYDROCARBON ENRICHMENT IN THE DONGYING AND THE HUIMIN SAGS[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2003, 25(4): 366-370. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200304366
    [18]DAI Jin-xing. POOL-FORMING PERIODS AND GAS SOURCES OF WEIYUAN GASFIELD[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2003, 25(5): 473-480. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200305473
    [19]ZHAO Lin, XIA Xin-yu, DAI Jin-xing, HONG Feng. MAJOR FACTORS CONTROLLING THE ENRICHMENT OF THE UPPER PALEOZOIC NATURAL GAS IN THE ORDOS BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2000, 22(2): 136-139. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200002136
    [20]Gong Yujin, Zeng Weixiong. A CARBON DIOXIDE GAS FIELD IN HUANGQIAO, NORTH JIANGSU PROVINCE——A SPECIAL POOL-FORMING TYPE[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1998, 20(4): 374-378. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199804374
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 姚建廷,周栋,刘荣和,刘四兵. 阿姆河右岸中-下侏罗统烃源岩地球化学特征及其沉积环境研究. 地质科学. 2024(02): 352-364 .
    2. 李智,李英强,何登发,李双建,梅庆华,张志业. 阿姆河右岸区域构造大剖面解析及成因探讨. 地质科学. 2023(01): 259-272 .
    3. 杨大有,陈怀龙,魏小东,文光耀,牛志文,陈进娥. 基于地震的碳酸盐岩双重介质建模技术及应用. 石油地球物理勘探. 2023(S1): 90-96 .
    4. 张良杰,王红军,程木伟,龚幸林,邢玉忠,蒋凌志,张宏伟,吴德峰,王丽新. 阿姆河右岸东部侏罗系盐下断层发育特征及其对天然气富集影响. 中国石油勘探. 2022(02): 71-83 .
    5. 郑可,孙丽,刘荣和,李洪玺,张李. 阿姆河右岸某跨境气田增压必要性及优化研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 121-131 .
    6. 王红军,张良杰,陈怀龙,张宏伟,白振华,蒋凌志. 阿姆河右岸盐下侏罗系大中型气田地质特征与分布规律. 中国石油勘探. 2020(04): 52-64 .
    7. 王浩,李洪玺. 阿姆河右岸M气田卡洛夫——牛津阶缓坡相碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素. 中国石油和化工标准与质量. 2019(01): 185-187 .
    8. 张良杰,王红军,蒋凌志,冷有恒,刘荣和,武重阳,张宏伟. 阿姆河右岸扬恰地区碳酸盐岩气田富集高产因素. 天然气勘探与开发. 2019(01): 15-20 .
    9. 刘静静,邬长武,丁峰. 南大西洋两岸含盐盆地类型与油气分布规律. 石油实验地质. 2018(03): 372-380 . 本站查看
    10. 张娟. 沾化凹陷长堤地区沙一段下部生物灰岩发育模式及分布特征. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(03): 36-42 .
    11. 李琦,徐亮,匡冬琴. 阿姆河右岸区块气藏酸气的成因与分布影响因素. 地球科学进展. 2017(11): 1183-1192 .
    12. 汪峰,陈世悦,马帅,王志金. 柴达木盆地东北缘早石炭世生物礁发育特征及成礁模式. 特种油气藏. 2017(03): 37-43 .
    13. 张培军,高仪君,万翠蓉,刘荣和,张李,李洪玺. 阿姆河右岸奥贾尔雷气田气井生产异常压力产生原因及对策. 天然气工业. 2016(10): 77-84 .
    14. 王浩,费怀义,程绪彬,李洪玺. 别什肯特坳陷区卡洛夫—牛津阶缓坡相灰岩储层特征及主控因素. 岩性油气藏. 2016(06): 23-29 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.7 %FULLTEXT: 21.7 %META: 75.2 %META: 75.2 %PDF: 3.1 %PDF: 3.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.6 %其他: 7.6 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Netherlands: 0.3 %Netherlands: 0.3 %[]: 1.4 %[]: 1.4 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.8 %上海: 0.8 %乌鲁木齐: 0.6 %乌鲁木齐: 0.6 %伦敦: 0.3 %伦敦: 0.3 %兰州: 0.7 %兰州: 0.7 %北京: 6.2 %北京: 6.2 %和田: 0.6 %和田: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %库尔布瓦: 0.6 %库尔布瓦: 0.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %张家口: 2.7 %张家口: 2.7 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %斯塔万格: 0.4 %斯塔万格: 0.4 %曼谷: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %沃特伯里: 2.2 %沃特伯里: 2.2 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %米兰: 0.7 %米兰: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 56.9 %芒廷维尤: 56.9 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %莫斯科: 0.8 %莫斯科: 0.8 %西宁: 9.4 %西宁: 9.4 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %首尔: 0.1 %首尔: 0.1 %马德里: 0.1 %马德里: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaIndiaNetherlands[]三门峡上海乌鲁木齐伦敦兰州北京和田哥伦布嘉兴天津宣城巴音郭楞库尔布瓦弗吉尼亚州张家口成都斯塔万格曼谷杭州格兰特县森尼韦尔武汉沃特伯里温州湘潭盘锦石家庄福州米兰芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科西宁贵阳运城遵义郑州长沙长治首尔马德里

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1487) PDF downloads(1078) Cited by(21)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return