Liu Weixin, Bao Fang, Yu Lingjie, Zhang Wentao, Zhang Qingzheng, Lu Longfei, Fan Ming. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453
Citation: Liu Weixin, Bao Fang, Yu Lingjie, Zhang Wentao, Zhang Qingzheng, Lu Longfei, Fan Ming. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453

Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453
  • Received Date: 2016-02-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-06-01
  • Publish Date: 2016-07-28
  • Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales in the southeastern Sichuan Basin were studied using CT, FIB-SEM, Ar+-SEM, and TEM techniques. Four modes for micro-pores in shales were determined to be as follows. (1) Intergranular micro-pores which exist between mineral grains and account for a small proportion of the total. (2) Intragranular micro-pores which mainly exist in intergranular dispersed organic matter or symbiosis organic matter with globular pyrite, and some between clay layers. (3) Grain boundary fractures which exist around organic or mineral grains, and work as a connective network for the shales. (4) Interlayer bedding which provides filtration channels. Intraparticle organic nano-pores are bubble like, show a normal size distribution, and are connected to each other. Their diameter mainly ranges from 30-90 nm and throat width ranges from 7-20 nm. Interlayer bedding accounts for 1%-2% of total shale pores and fractures, and are favorable filtration channels. Micro-pores and fractures in organic matter provide the main reservoir space for shale gas, grain boundary fractures form a connective network, while interlayer bedding provides filtration channels.

     

  • [1]
    邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653. Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.
    [2]
    Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
    [3]
    Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,Rai C S,et al.Microstructural studies of gas shale//Society of Petroleum Engineers Unconventional Gas Conference.Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010:1-17.
    [4]
    Slatt R M,O'Neal N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shale:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
    [5]
    Milner M,McLin R,Petriello J.Imaging texture and porosity in mudstones and shales:Comparison of secondary and ion-milled backscatter SEM methods//Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.Calgary,Alberta,Canada:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010:1-10.
    [6]
    Gale J F W,Holder J.Natural fractures in some U.S. shales and their importance for gas production//Proceedings of the 7th Petroleum Geology Conference Series 2010. London :Geological Society of London,2010:1131-1140.
    [7]
    Slatt R M,Abousleiman Y.Merging sequence stratigraphy and geomechanics for unconventional gas shales[J].The Leading Edge,2011,30(3):274-282.
    [8]
    Aringhieri R.Nanoporosity characteristics of some natural clay minerals and soils[J].Clays and Clay Minerals,2004,52(6):700-704.
    [9]
    Clarkson C R,Jensen J L,Pedersen P K,et al.Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(2):355-374.
    [10]
    Chalmers G R,Bustin R M,Power I M.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry,pycnometry,surface area,and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:Examples from the Barnett,Woodford,Haynesville,Marcellus,and Doig units[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1099-1119.
    [11]
    Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Sondergeld C H,et al.Transmission and scanning electron microscopy investigation of pore connectivity of gas shales on the nanoscale//North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition.Woodlands,Texas,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2011.
    [12]
    Curtis M E,Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,et al.Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(4):665-677.
    [13]
    Klaver J,Desbois G,Urai J L,et al.BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia Shale from the Hils area,Germany[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,103:12-25.
    [14]
    王志刚.涪陵焦石坝地区页岩气水平井压裂改造实践与认识[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(3):425-430. Wang Zhigang.Practice and cognition of shale gas horizontal well fracturing stimulation in Jiaoshiba of Fuling area[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(3):425-430.
    [15]
    肖贤明,宋之光,朱炎铭,等.北美页岩气研究及对我国下古生界页岩气开发的启示[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):721-728. Xiao Xianming,Song Zhiguang,Zhu Yanming,et al.Summary of shale gas research in North American and revelations to shale gas exploration of Lower Paleozoic strata in China south area[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):721-728.
    [16]
    曾祥亮,刘树根,黄文明,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):372-384. Zeng Xiangliang,Liu Shugen,Huang Wenming,et al.Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States[J].Geologcal Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):372-384.
    [17]
    韩双彪,张金川,Horsfield B,等.页岩气储层孔隙类型及特征研究:以渝东南下古生界为例[J].地学前缘,2013,20(3):247-253. Han Shuangbiao,Zhang Jinchuan,Horsfield B,et al.Pore types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:A case study of lower Paleozoic shale in southeast Chongqing[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(3):247-253.
    [18]
    聂海宽,张金川.页岩气储层类型和特征研究:以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(3):219-225. Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchuan.Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:A case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2011,33(3):219-225.
    [19]
    孙梦迪,于炳松,李娟,等.渝东南地区龙马溪组页岩储层特征与主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(4):63-66. Sun Mengdi,Yu Bingsong,Li Juan,et al.Features and Major Controlling Factors of Longmaxi Shale Reservoir in Southeastern Chongqing[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2014,21(4):63-66.
    [20]
    马勇,钟宁宁,程礼军,等.渝东南两套富有机质页岩的孔隙结构特征:来自FIB-SEM的新启示[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(1):109-116. Ma Yong,Zhong Ningning,Cheng Lijun,et al.Pore structure of two organic-rich shales in southeastern Chongqing area: Insight from Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM)[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(1):109-116.
    [21]
    赵可英,郭少斌.海陆过渡相页岩气储层孔隙特征及主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界为例[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(2):141-149. Zhao Keying,Guo Shaobin.Characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs in transitional facies: A case study of Upper Paleozoic in Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(2):141-149.
    [22]
    蒲泊伶,董大忠,牛嘉玉,等.页岩气储层研究新进展[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(2):98-104. Pu Boling,Dong Dazhong,Niu Jiayu,et al.Principal progresses in shale gas reservoir research[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(2):98-104.
    [23]
    邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864. Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,27(6):1857-1864.
    [24]
    张盼盼,刘小平,王雅杰,等.页岩纳米孔隙研究新进展[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(11):1242-1249. Zhang Panpan,Liu Xiaoping,Wang Yajie,et al.Research progress in shale nanopores[J].Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(11):1242-1249.
    [25]
    张月,文慧俭,白东来,等.松辽盆地大安油田纳米级孔隙研究[J].断块油气田,2015,22(4):440-444. Zhang Yue,Wen Huijian,Bai Donglai,et al.Study on nanopore throat in Da'an Oilfield,Songliao Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2015,22(4):440-444.
    [26]
    焦堃,姚素平,吴浩,等.页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J].高校地质学报,2014,20(1):151-161. Jiao Kun,Yao Suping,Wu Hao,et al.Advances in characterization of pore system of gas shales[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2014,20(1):151-161.
    [27]
    杨峰,宁正福,胡昌蓬,等.页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J].石油学报,2013,34(2):300-310. Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Hu Changpeng,et al.Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(2):300-310.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 张吉振,韩登林,林伟,王晨晨,王建国,肖肖,李豫,张晓婵. 松辽盆地白垩系嫩江组煤系页岩孔隙结构及分形特征. 天然气地球科学. 2024(01): 119-132 .
    2. 林伟,郭伟,张吉振,李明涛. 川南地区龙马溪组复杂岩相类型页岩储层有机质差异性成孔机制. 天然气地球科学. 2024(01): 133-148 .
    3. Junliang Li,Min Wang,Min Wang,Jinbu Li,Xinbin Zhao,Xingzhong Hu,Aibing Fu. Shale primary porosimetry based on 2D nuclear magnetic resonance of T_1-T_2. Energy Geoscience. 2024(03): 56-69 .
    4. 安谧,徐华,张若霖,张兆前,郑方,王剑. 基于FIB-SEM和TEM的催化裂化催化剂元素分布研究. 石油炼制与化工. 2023(03): 48-53 .
    5. 李勇,何建华,邓虎成,马若龙,王琨瑜,李瑞雪,赵雅绮,唐建明,陈鑫豪. 常压页岩储层优势岩相孔隙结构表征及其影响因素——以川东南林滩场五峰组—龙马溪组为例. 天然气地球科学. 2023(07): 1274-1288 .
    6. 唐建明,何建华,魏力民,李勇,邓虎成,李瑞雪,赵爽. 川东南林滩场地区五峰组——龙马溪组页岩气藏压力演化及其地质意义. 石油实验地质. 2023(04): 739-750 . 本站查看
    7. 刘雨林,范凌霄,房大志,彭勇民,曾联波,冯动军. 源—储分类新方法在川东地区页岩气井产量分析中的应用. 油气藏评价与开发. 2022(03): 429-436 .
    8. 刘伟新,卢龙飞,叶德燎,何陈诚,刘旺威,俞凌杰,张文涛,申宝剑. 川东南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气异常压力封存箱剖析与形成机制. 石油实验地质. 2022(05): 804-814 . 本站查看
    9. 王濡岳,胡宗全,董立,高波,孙川翔,杨滔,王冠平,尹帅. 页岩气储层表征评价技术进展与思考. 石油与天然气地质. 2021(01): 54-65 .
    10. 宋腾,包书景,陈科,周志,李浩涵,雷玉雪,段轲. 鄂西北神农架地区下寒武统泥页岩微观储集结构特征及其影响因素. 天然气地球科学. 2021(06): 871-887 .
    11. 宋明水,刘惠民,王勇,刘雅利. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践. 石油勘探与开发. 2020(02): 225-235 .
    12. 徐二社,陶国亮,李志明,吴世强,张文涛,饶丹. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间页岩油储层不同岩相微观储集特征——以古近系潜江组三段4亚段10韵律为例. 石油实验地质. 2020(02): 193-201 . 本站查看
    13. SONG Mingshui,LIU Huimin,WANG Yong,LIU Yali. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2020(02): 242-253 .
    14. 刘伟新,卢龙飞,魏志红,俞凌杰,张文涛,徐陈杰,叶德燎,申宝剑,范明. 川东南地区不同埋深五峰组—龙马溪组页岩储层微观结构特征与对比. 石油实验地质. 2020(03): 378-386 . 本站查看
    15. 徐文明,蒋启贵,刘伟新,陶国亮,张文涛,钱门辉,曹婷婷,鲍云杰,李志明. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间潜3~4油组储层微观结构特征及与物性的关系. 石油实验地质. 2020(04): 565-574 . 本站查看
    16. 王濡岳,聂海宽,胡宗全,刘光祥,席斌斌,刘伟新. 压力演化对页岩气储层的控制作用——以四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组为例. 天然气工业. 2020(10): 1-11 .
    17. 陈斐然,魏祥峰,刘珠江,敖明冲,燕继红. 四川盆地二叠系龙潭组页岩孔隙发育特征及主控因素. 天然气地球科学. 2020(11): 1593-1602 .
    18. 张磊. 压汞-吸附联合测定法在焦石坝地区的应用. 江汉石油职工大学学报. 2020(05): 36-39 .
    19. 汪虎,何治亮,张永贵,苏坤,王濡岳,赵聪会. 四川盆地海相页岩储层微裂缝类型及其对储层物性影响. 石油与天然气地质. 2019(01): 41-49 .
    20. 何庆,何生,董田,翟刚毅,王亿,万阔. 鄂西下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及影响因素. 石油实验地质. 2019(04): 530-539 . 本站查看
    21. 张慧,晋香兰,吴静,杨庆龙,郝林山. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩有机质的纳米孔隙. 煤田地质与勘探. 2018(03): 47-53 .
    22. 舒志国,关红梅,喻璐,柳筠. 四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层孔隙参数测井评价方法. 石油实验地质. 2018(01): 38-43 . 本站查看
    23. 曹涛涛,邓模,罗厚勇,刘虎,刘光祥,HURSTHOUSE Andrew Stefan. 下扬子地区中上二叠统页岩有机孔发育特征. 石油实验地质. 2018(03): 315-322+396 . 本站查看
    24. 任聪,李勇,赵晓红,陈伟,王书彦,李居正. 川中高磨地区灯影组微孔结构及可动流体饱和度特征. 新疆石油地质. 2018(04): 467-472 .
    25. 王濡岳,尹帅,龚大建,王冠平,杨滔,尚素芹. 下寒武统页岩孔隙结构与分形特征. 断块油气田. 2018(05): 589-592 .
    26. 惠威,贾昱昕,程凡,刘斐雯,任大忠. 苏里格气田东部盒8储层微观孔隙结构及可动流体饱和度影响因素. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(05): 10-16 .
    27. 马中良,郑伦举,徐旭辉,鲍芳,余晓露. 富有机质页岩有机孔隙形成与演化的热模拟实验. 石油学报. 2017(01): 23-30 .

    Other cited types(17)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1448) PDF downloads(1445) Cited by(44)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return