Wang Weifeng, Hu Yu, Yu Zhengjun, Chen Jie, Shan Chenchen, Zhang Xiaojie. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of slope fans in Dongying delta front[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(5): 600-608. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201605600
Citation: Wang Weifeng, Hu Yu, Yu Zhengjun, Chen Jie, Shan Chenchen, Zhang Xiaojie. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of slope fans in Dongying delta front[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(5): 600-608. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201605600

Reservoir characteristics and genesis of slope fans in Dongying delta front

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201605600
  • Received Date: 2015-09-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-07-26
  • Publish Date: 2016-09-28
  • Slope fan refers to a sedimentary sand body which evolved from retransportation of delta or fan delta sand. It is caused by earthquakes and other factors and is transported in the form of slide, slump or debris flow. Based on core description, well logging and seismic data, combined with field investigation and sedimentation simulation, the reservoir characteristics and genesis were summarized. The lithology of a slope fan sand body is mainly fine sandstone and siltstone. Sedimentary structures are characterized by massive bedding, load cast and slump structures. It can be identified as a blocky or finger wireline log. The seismic facies is moundy or sphenoid shaped and the amplitude is moderate to strong. Slope fans are manifested as slide, slump and debris flow sand bodies. According to sedimentation simulation, 7 slope fan styles were differentiated. Combined with the geology of the Niuzhuang Subsag in the Dongying Sag, the distribution of slope fans was forecasted and two favorable prospecting target areas of slope fan were identified.

     

  • [1]
    操应长,刘晖.湖盆三角洲沉积坡度带特征及其与滑塌浊积岩分布关系的初步探讨[J].地质论评,2007,53(4):454-459. Cao Yingchang,Liu Hui.Discussion on the relationship between distribution of fluxoturbidite and depositional slope of delta in lacustrine basin[J].Geological Review,2007,53(4):454-459.
    [2]
    刘晖,操应长,徐涛玉,等.沉积坡折带控砂的模拟实验研究[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,26(1):34-37. Liu Hui,Cao Yingchang,Xu Taoyu,et al.The simulation experiment about the control of sandy body in depositional slope-break belt[J].Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology,2007,26(1):34-37.
    [3]
    蔡雄飞,蔡海磊,刘德民,等.造山带大陆斜坡沉积类型[J].海洋地质动态,2006,22(1):9-13. Cai Xiongfei,Cai Hailei,Liu Demin,et al.Sedimentary type of continental slope of orogenic belt[J].Marine Geology Letters,2006,22(1):9-13.
    [4]
    李楠,李国辉,吴长江,等.坡折带控制下的砂质碎屑流对油气勘探的意义:以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组为例[J].四川地质学报,2014,34(4):505-509. Li Nan,Li Guohui,Wu Changjiang,et al.The application of sandy debris flow under the contrl of slope break to oil-gas exploration[J].Acta Geologica Sichuan,2014,34(4):505-509.
    [5]
    刘忠保,张春生,龚文平,等.牵引流砂质载荷沿陡坡滑动形成砂质碎屑流沉积模拟研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2008,30(6):30-38. Liu Zhongbao,Zhang Chunsheng,Gong Wenping,et al.A study on sedimentary simulation of sandy clastic current formed by sliding of traction current with sandy load along steep slope[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2008,30(6):30-38.
    [6]
    廖纪佳,朱筱敏,邓秀芹,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组重力流沉积特征及其模式[J].地学前缘,2013,20(2):29-39. Liao Jijia,Zhu Xiaomin,Deng Xiuqin,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and model of gravity flow in Triassic Yanchang Formation of Longdong area in Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(2):29-39.
    [7]
    Shanmugam G.深水砂体成因研究新进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):294-301. Shanmugam G.New perspectives on deepwater sandstones:Implications[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):294-301.
    [8]
    邹才能,赵政璋,杨华,等.陆相湖盆深水砂质碎屑流成因机制与分布特征:以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J].沉积学报,2009,27(6):1065-1075. Zou Caineng,Zhao Zhengzhang,Yang Hua,et al.Genetic mechanism and distribution of sandy debris flows in terrestrial lacustrine basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(6):1065-1075.
    [9]
    李果营,钟建华,饶孟余,等.东辛地区沙三段滑塌浊积扇沉积特征及控制因素[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(6):25-28. Li Guoying,Zhong Jianhua,Rao Mengyu,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and control factors of slump turbidite fans in Es3 of Dongxin region[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2005,12(6):25-28.
    [10]
    饶孟余,钟建华,王夕宾,等.东营凹陷东部沙三段滑塌浊积砂体沉积特征[J].煤田地质与勘探,2004,32(3):15-17. Rao Mengyu,Zhong Jianhua,Wang Xibin,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of creeping turbidite sandbody of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in eastern Dongying Depression[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2004,32(3):15-17.
    [11]
    夏景生,王志坤,陈刚,等.东营凹陷东部深层浊积扇油藏成藏条件与模式研究[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):55-60. Xia Jingsheng,Wang Zhikun,Chen Gang,et al.Accumulation condition and model of turbidite fan reservoir in eastern Dong-ying Sag[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(1):55-60.
    [12]
    王金铎,韩文功,于建国,等.东营凹陷沙三段浊积岩体系及其油气勘探意义[J].石油学报,2003,24(6):24-29. Wang Jinduo,Han Wengong,Yu Jianguo,et al.Turbidity system in the third section of Shahejie Formation of Dongying Sag and its implications on petroleum prospecting[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(6):24-29.
    [13]
    孙海宁,夏景生,钟建华,等.山东东营凹陷东部浊积扇油藏成藏条件与模式[J].地质力学学报,2008,14(3):221-230. Sun Haining,Xia Jingsheng,Zhong Jianhua,et al.The condition and pattern of turbidite fan reservoir formation in eastern Dongying Depression,Shandong Province[J].Journal of Geomechanics,2008,14(3):221-230.
    [14]
    李宇志,毕明威,刘惠民,等.沙三中亚期东营三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩定量预测[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):146-155. Li Yuzhi,Bi Mingwei,Liu Huimin,et al.Quantitative prediction of slump turbidites of the Dongying delta front in mid Es3[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):146-155.
    [15]
    夏景生,王成明,王志坤,等.山东东营凹陷东部深层浊积扇储层的微观特征及影响因素[J].中国地质,2008,35(5):975-983. Xia Jingsheng,Wang Chengming,Wang Zhikun,et al.Micro-properties and influence factors of deep turbidite fan reservoirs in the eastern Dongying subbasin,Shandong[J].Geology in China,2008,35(5):975-983.
    [16]
    尹太举,张昌民,李中超.东营凹陷滑塌浊积岩沉积特征及油气藏勘探技术[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1):93-98. Yin Taiju,Zhang Changmin,Li Zhongchao.Depositional characteristics of fluxoturbidite and exploration technologies of subtle reservoirs in the Dongying Sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(1):93-98.
    [17]
    鄢继华,陈世悦,宋国奇,等.三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩形成过程初探[J].沉积学报,2004,22(4):573-578. Yan Jihua,Chen Shiyue,Song Guoqi,et al.Preliminary study on the formation of fluxoturbidite in front of delta[J].Acta Sedi-mentologica Sinica,2004,22(4):573-578.
    [18]
    王居峰,贾光华,刘军锷,等.史南地区沙三段浊积砂体成因模式探讨[J].油气地质与采收率,2003,10(4):8-10. Wang Jufeng,Jia Guanghua,Liu Jun'e,et al.Discussion on the genesis model for turbidites of Es3 in Shinan area[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2003,10(4):8-10.
    [19]
    陈秀艳,姜在兴,杜伟,等.东营凹陷沙三中亚段东营三角洲沉积期次成因及对含油性的影响[J].沉积学报,2014,32(2):344-353. Chen Xiuyan,Jiang Zaixing,Du Wei,et al.Origin of depositional cycles and their influence on oil-bearing sandstone of Dongying Delta in mid-Es3,Dongying Depression[J].Acta Sedimentolo-gica Sinica,2014,32(2):344-353.
    [20]
    陈世悦,毕明威,刘惠民,等.沙三中亚期东营三角洲—滑塌浊积体系预测模型研究[J].沉积学报,2014,32(5):921-929. Chen Shiyue,Bi Mingwei,Liu Huimin,et al.Quantitative prediction model for the Dongying delta-fluxoturbidite depositional system in the middle Es3 period[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(5):921-929.
    [21]
    向立宏,赵铭海,郝雪峰,等.济阳坳陷东营组沉积体系新认识[J].油气地质与采收率,2016,23(3):8-13,66. Xiang Lihong,Zhao Minghai,Hao Xuefeng,et al.New understanding on sedimentary system of Dongying Formation in Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery,2016,23(3):8-13,66.
    [22]
    徐冠华,蔡进功,盖蓓,等.滨南地区沙三段重力流沉积特征及含油气性分析[J].断块油气田,2015,22(3):282-286. Xu Guanhua,Cai Jingong,Ge Bei,et al.Depositional characte-ristics and gas/oil distribution of gravity flow of third member of Shahejie Formation in Binnan area[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(3):282-286.
    [23]
    孙昶旭,崔永刚,罗文生,等.东营凹陷东营三角洲与中央隆起带盐—泥构造形成的关系及其对隐蔽油气藏勘探的意义[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(4):462-467. Sun Changxu,Cui Yonggang,Luo Wensheng,et al.Relationship between Dongying delta of Dongying Depression and formation of salt-shale structure in central uplift and meaning in exploration of subtle oil/gas reservoir[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2006,41(4):462-467.
    [24]
    张善文,王英民,李群.应用坡折带理论寻找隐蔽油气藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):5-7. Zhang Shanwen,Wang Yingmin,Li Qun.Searching subtle traps using the theory of slope break[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(3):5-7.
    [25]
    鄢继华.三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩物理模拟实验研究.青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2005. Yan Jihua.Simulating experiment study of fluxoturbidite in front of delta.Qingdao:China University of Petroleum,2005.
    [26]
    邵珠福,钟建华,李勇,等.青岛灵山岛晚中生代重力流沉积特征及环境分析[J].地质论评,2014,60(3):555-566. Shao Zhufu,Zhong Jianhua,Li Yong,et al.The sedimentary characteristics and environmental analysis of late Mesozoic gravity flows in Lingshan Island[J].Geological Review,2014,60(3):555-566.
    [27]
    鄢继华,陈世悦,姜在兴,等.断陷湖盆震浊积岩成因模拟实验[J].古地理学报,2007,9(3):277-282. Yan Jihua,Chen Shiyue,Jiang Zaixing,et al.Simulating experiment on genesis of seismo-turbidites in rift lacustrine basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2007,9(3):277-282.
    [28]
    潘树新,郑荣才,卫平生,等.陆相湖盆块体搬运体的沉积特征、识别标志与形成机制[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):9-18. Pan Shuxin,Zheng Rongcai,Wei Pingsheng,et al.Deposition characteristics,recognition mark and form mechanism of mass transport deposits in terrestrial lake basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(2):9-18.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 曲星宇. 东营凹陷梁东地区古近系沙三中亚段层序地层划分及石油地质意义. 岩性油气藏. 2025(02): 166-177 .
    2. 吴宇翔,柳保军,张春生,丁琳,谢世文,李小平,龙更生. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近纪挠曲缓坡带三角洲沉积过程响应水槽模拟. 石油实验地质. 2022(03): 476-486 . 本站查看
    3. 杨田,操应长,田景春. 浅谈陆相湖盆深水重力流沉积研究中的几点认识. 沉积学报. 2021(01): 88-111 .
    4. 宋明水,茆书巍,林会喜,郝雪峰,巩建强,张鹏飞,邱贻博,王园园. 断陷湖盆湖底扇砂岩体沉积特征及主控因素分析——以东营凹陷民丰地区沙三段中亚段为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2021(03): 1-13 .
    5. 路智勇,吴孔友. 东营凹陷滑动及滑塌扇体特征及分布模式. 特种油气藏. 2020(03): 8-13 .
    6. 周学文,姜在兴,汤望新,许文茂,胡晨林,贾超尘. 牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段三角洲—重力流体系沉积特征与模式. 沉积学报. 2018(02): 376-389 .
    7. 宋光永,朱超,李森明,王艳清,夏志远,潘科. 油砂山地区浅水三角洲-滨浅湖沉积及其对储层的控制. 断块油气田. 2018(02): 146-150 .
    8. 赵一璇. 塔东南坳陷侏罗系康苏组沉积特征. 特种油气藏. 2018(03): 37-43 .
    9. 姜超. 断陷湖盆斜坡带重力流砂体沉积特征及沉积模式——以沾化凹陷渤南洼陷南部斜坡带沙三段为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(01): 6-13 .
    10. 宋洪亮,李云鹏,刘宗宾,柴秋会,陈善斌,颜冠山. 辫状河三角洲前缘亚相储层分布模式分析及应用——以JX油田东块沙河街组为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(01): 37-42 .
    11. 孙乐,王志章,于兴河,王辉,杨丽,曹茜. 克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组沉积相及砂体展布特征. 断块油气田. 2017(04): 474-480 .
    12. 马英俊. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷阜二段砂岩物性影响因素分析. 石油实验地质. 2017(04): 477-483 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 20.0 %FULLTEXT: 20.0 %META: 78.9 %META: 78.9 %PDF: 1.1 %PDF: 1.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.0 %其他: 4.0 %其他: 3.2 %其他: 3.2 %China: 0.7 %China: 0.7 %Elizabeth City: 0.4 %Elizabeth City: 0.4 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.2 %三门峡: 0.2 %上海: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %北京: 1.6 %北京: 1.6 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宿州: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %张家口: 3.7 %张家口: 3.7 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %益阳: 0.5 %益阳: 0.5 %盘锦: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %素叻府: 0.1 %素叻府: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 29.4 %芒廷维尤: 29.4 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.5 %莫斯科: 0.5 %西宁: 50.6 %西宁: 50.6 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.4 %阿什本: 0.4 %其他其他ChinaElizabeth CityIndia三门峡上海北京南通天津宣城宿州张家口杭州武汉济南湘潭湛江漯河益阳盘锦石家庄素叻府芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州锦州长沙长治阿什本

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1098) PDF downloads(183) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return