Yang Peng, An Yongfu, Chen Yang. Risk evaluation and preventive measure of buried outer pipelines in transfer station: A case study of AZ1 transfer station, area S, northwestern China[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(S1): 153-159. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2016S1153
Citation: Yang Peng, An Yongfu, Chen Yang. Risk evaluation and preventive measure of buried outer pipelines in transfer station: A case study of AZ1 transfer station, area S, northwestern China[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(S1): 153-159. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2016S1153

Risk evaluation and preventive measure of buried outer pipelines in transfer station: A case study of AZ1 transfer station, area S, northwestern China

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2016S1153
  • Received Date: 2016-08-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-10-14
  • Publish Date: 2016-11-15
  • Crude oils went through buried pipelines by their original pressure to transfer stations after pumping out from wells. They were heated, dried and pressured, and then transported to oil-gas united stations for further complicated processing such as desulfuration, dehydration and oil-gas-water separation, and finally sent outside through long-distance pipelines. In consideration of the complexity of technological process and the dangerousness of transmission medium, an early-warning system of risks is required not only for the process of gathering and transportation, but also for the buried pipelines between wells and oil-gas united stations. Since crude oils are untreated until transporting to united stations, the buried pipelines between wells and united stations are easily to be corroded and crack. Therefore, a risk evaluation and preventive measure of buried outer pipelines are really needed. A case study was made in AZ1 transfer station, S area in an oilfield in northwestern China. We collected and counted all corrosion reasons for three years, and studied normal operations, operation risks and corrosion causes using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). An early-warning system of risks and some preventive measures were provided.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    张世翔,章言鼎. 青岛输油管道泄漏爆炸事故分析与整改建议[J]. 工业安全与环保,2014(12):89-91.
    [2]
    王玉算. 危险化学品事故应急救援机制研究[D]. 泉州:华侨大学, 2015.
    [3]
    孙伟博,李华,蒲子芳,等. 从青岛、大连两起输油管道爆炸事件谈陆地溢油应急处置[J]. 环境工程,2015(S1):883-886.
    [4]
    张树才,牟善军,赵勇,等. 风险评估和事故调查改进探讨:青岛"11·22"输油管道爆炸事故反思[J]. 安全、健康和环境,2015(12):7-10.
    [5]
    张媛媛,王敏,卢宏伟,等. 青岛黄潍输油管道泄漏爆炸事故溢油风化规律[J]. 环境化学,2015(9):1741-1747.
    [6]
    赵东风,陈爽,赵志强,等. 基于脆弱性的油气管道风险评估及其应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2014(7):57-62.
    [7]
    戚建刚. 解析"11·22"青岛输油管道爆炸事件中的六类违法行为[J]. 法学杂志,2014(6):37-43.
    [8]
    王毅辉,李勇,蒋蓉,等. 中国石油西南油气田公司管道完整性管理研究与实践[J]. 天然气工业,2013(3):78-83.
    [9]
    辛颖,王岩. 基于作业条件危险性分析的集输站场模糊风险评价[J]. 化学工程与装备,2015(4):211-214.
    [10]
    张照鸿. 延长气田集输管道的事故分析及风险评价[D]. 西安:西安石油大学, 2014.
    [11]
    蒋宏业. 油田联合站风险评价技术研究[D]. 成都:西南石油学院, 2004.
    [12]
    王明凤. 集输场站量化风险评价应用研究[D]. 武汉:长江大学, 2012.
    [13]
    辛颖,王岩. 油气集输站场实时风险预警评价体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2013(5):151-155.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1785) PDF downloads(142) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return