Advanced Search
Volume 39 Issue 1
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2017  >  39(1): 71-78
Geng Yikai, Jin Zhenkui, Zhao Jianhua, Wen Xin, Wang Yang. Controlling factors of pore types in shale reservoirs:A case study from the Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(1): 71-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701071
Citation: Geng Yikai, Jin Zhenkui, Zhao Jianhua, Wen Xin, Wang Yang. Controlling factors of pore types in shale reservoirs:A case study from the Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(1): 71-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701071
shu

Controlling factors of pore types in shale reservoirs:A case study from the Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area, eastern Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701071
  • 1.

    College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

  • 2. No.2 Oil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Daqing, Heilongjian 163257, China

  • Received Date: 2016-05-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-11-18
  • Publish Date: 2017-01-28
    Abstract
  • Ar-ion beam scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging and the quantitative analysis of pore types were performed on 7 shale samples from the Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin to define the vertical distribution characteristics of pore types in various lithofacies of shale. Five regions were selected in each sample to accommodate the heterogeneity of the shales, and each region (100 μm×100 μm) was analyzed using 100 SEM photographs which were magnified 14 000×. A 2000 point-count method was employed to count the plane porosity of various pores on each SEM photograph, and then the average percentage of various pores in each sample was obtained. The results showed that interparticle (interP) pores, intraparticle (intraP) pores and organic matter (OM) pores could be observed in the study area, and the contents of various pore types were different in various lithofacies. The lithofacies of Longmaxi Formation changed from argillaceous shale, silty shale to siliceous shale from top to bottom. The main pore type changed from intraP pores to OM pores with the increase of TOC content and the decrease of clay content. The content of brittle minerals controlled the quantity of interP pores, clay content controlled the development degree of intraP pores, while TOC and authigenic quartz contents determined the quantity of OM pores. Siliceous shale in the lower segment of Longmaxi Formation is the most favorable reservoir for shale gas.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(20)
  • [1]
    Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
    [2]
    张金川,金之钧,袁明生.页岩气成藏机理和分布[J].天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18. Zhang Jinchuan,Jin Zhijun,Yuan Mingsheng.Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(7):15-18.
    [3]
    Hill J R,Zhang E T,Katz J B,et al.Modeling of gas generation from the Barnett shale,Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):501-521.
    [4]
    McCreesh C A,Ehrlich R,Crabtree S J.Petrography and reservoir physics Ⅱ:Relating thin section porosity to capillary pressure,the association between pore types and throat size[J].AAPG Bulletin,1991,75(10):1563-1578.
    [5]
    Passey Q R,Bohacs K M,Esch W L,et al.From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir:Geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs//SPE-131350-MS,International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.Beijing,China:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
    [6]
    Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
    [7]
    Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
    [8]
    Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Preliminary classification of matrix pores in mudrocks[J].Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions,2010,60(2):435-441.
    [9]
    Desbois G,Urai J L,Kukla P A.Morphology of the pore space in claystones:Evidence from BIB/FIB ion beam sectioning and cryo-SEM observations[J].Eearth,2009,4(1):15-22.
    [10]
    Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Sondergeld C H.Structural characterization of gas shales on the micro- and nano-scales//SPE-137693-MS,Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.Calgary,Alberta,Candan:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
    [11]
    Lu Jiemin,Milliken K,Reed R M,et al.Diagenesis and sealing capacity of the middle Tuscaloosa mudstone at the Cranfield carbon dioxide injection site,Mississippi,U.S.A.[J].Environmental Geosciences,2011,18(1):35-53.
    [12]
    聂海宽,边瑞康,张培先,等.川东南地区下古生界页岩储层微观类型与特征及其对含气量的影响[J].地学前缘,2014,21(4):331-343. Nie Haikuan,Bian Ruikang,Zhang Peixian,et al.Micro-types and characteristics of shale reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic in southeast Sichuan Basin,and their effects on the gas content[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2014,21(4):331-343.
    [13]
    王亮,陈云燕,刘玉霞.川东南彭水地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(5):80-88. Wang Liang,Chen Yunyan,Liu Yuxia.Shale porous structural characteristics of Longmaxi Formation in Pengshui area of southeast Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(5):80-88.
    [14]
    曾祥亮,刘树根,黄文明,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):372-384. Zeng Xiangliang,Liu Shugen,Huang Wenming,et al.Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):372-384.
    [15]
    王秀平,牟传龙,葛祥英,等.四川盆地南部及其周缘龙马溪组黏土矿物研究[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(11):1781-1794. Wang Xiuping,Mou Chuanlong,Ge Xiangying,et al.Study on clay minerals in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(11):1781-1794.
    [16]
    Zhao Jianhua,Jin Zhijun,Jin Zhenkui,et al.Applying sedimentary geochemical proxies for paleoenvironment interpretation of organic-rich shale deposition in the Sichuan Basin,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,163:52-71.
    [17]
    刘江涛,刘双莲,李永杰,等.焦石坝地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J].油气地质与采收率,2016,23(3):53-57. Liu Jiangtao,Liu Shuanglian,Li Yongjie,et al. Geochemistry characteristics and its geological significance of shale in the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Jiaoshiba area[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2016,23(3):53-57.
    [18]
    卢龙飞,秦建中,申宝剑,等.川东南涪陵地区五峰-龙马溪组硅质页岩的生物成因及其油气地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(4):460-465. Lu Longfei,Qin Jianzhong,Shen Baojian,et al.Biogenic origin and hydrocarbon significance of siliceous shale from the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(4):460-465.
    [19]
    赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):572-586. Zhao Jianhua,Jin Zhijun,Jin Zhenkui,et al.Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):572-586.
    [20]
    赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组含气页岩中石英成因研究[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(2):377-386. Zhao Jianhua,Jin Zhijun,Jin Zhenkui,et al.The genesis of quartz in Wufeng-Longmaxi gas shales,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(2):377-386.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 马子杰，唐玄，张金川，翟刚毅，王玉芳，梁国栋，罗欢. 上扬子地区寒武系牛蹄塘组页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及主控因素. 地学前缘. 2023(03): 124-137 .
    2. 李旭，徐蒙，蔡进功，范明，刘伟新. 东营凹陷泥页岩孔隙结构特征及其演化规律. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(01): 88-100 .
    3. 王民，焦晨雪，李传明，李政，周能武，李进步，卢双舫，田福春，郝桂宪，石瑾. 东营凹陷沙河街组页岩微观孔隙多重分形特征. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(01): 72-79 .
    4. 李海，刘安，罗胜元，陈孝红，陈林. 鄂西宜昌斜坡区寒武系页岩储层发育特征——以鄂宜页1井为例. 石油实验地质. 2019(01): 76-82 . 本站查看
    5. 张瀛涵，李卓，刘冬冬，高凤琳，姜振学，梁志凯，杨东旭，于海龙. 松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩岩相特征及其对孔隙结构的控制. 石油实验地质. 2019(01): 142-148+156 . 本站查看
    6. 郭芪恒，金振奎，耿一凯，赵建华，常睿，崔学敏，王金艺. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩中碳酸盐矿物特征及对储集性能的影响. 天然气地球科学. 2019(05): 616-625 .
    7. 王朋飞，姜振学，金璨，吕鹏，李鑫，张昆，王凯，黄璞. 渝东南下志留统龙马溪组页岩有机质孔隙发育特征:基于聚焦离子束氦离子显微镜(FIB-HIM)技术. 现代地质. 2019(04): 902-910 .
    8. 曾秋楠，张交东，于炳松，刘旭锋，周新桂. 太康隆起上古生界海陆交互相页岩气地质条件分析. 特种油气藏. 2019(03): 49-55 .
    9. 姜瑞忠，原建伟，崔永正，潘红，李广，张海涛. 考虑岩石变形的页岩气藏双重介质数值模拟. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(04): 70-76 .
    10. 王曦蒙，刘洛夫，汪洋，盛悦，郑珊珊，罗泽华. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制. 石油学报. 2019(10): 1192-1201 .
    11. 王秀，张冲. 基于扫描电镜的页岩有机孔隙空间定量表征. CT理论与应用研究. 2019(05): 519-527 .
    12. 易积正，王超. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组海相页岩储层非均质性特征. 石油实验地质. 2018(01): 13-19 . 本站查看
    13. 刘尧文，王进，张梦吟，蔡进，卢文涛，沈童. 四川盆地涪陵地区五峰—龙马溪组页岩气层孔隙特征及对开发的启示. 石油实验地质. 2018(01): 44-50 . 本站查看
    14. 舒志国，关红梅，喻璐，柳筠. 四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层孔隙参数测井评价方法. 石油实验地质. 2018(01): 38-43 . 本站查看
    15. 罗兵，郁飞，陈亚琳，丁红伟. 四川盆地涪陵地区页岩气层构造特征与保存评价. 石油实验地质. 2018(01): 103-109+117 . 本站查看
    16. 曹涛涛，邓模，罗厚勇，刘虎，刘光祥，HURSTHOUSE Andrew Stefan. 下扬子地区中上二叠统页岩有机孔发育特征. 石油实验地质. 2018(03): 315-322+396 . 本站查看
    17. 白名岗，夏响华，张聪，孟凡洋，杨玉茹，张春贺，代峰，熊杰，王向华，于伟欣. 场发射扫描电镜及PerGeos系统在安页1井龙马溪组页岩有机质孔隙研究中的联合应用. 岩矿测试. 2018(03): 225-234 .
    18. 游利军，程秋洋，康毅力，陈强，崔佳. 氧化液作用下富有机质页岩裂缝应力敏感性. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(04): 79-85 .
    19. 王朋飞，吕鹏，姜振学，金璨，李鑫，张昆，黄璞，王毅. 中国海陆相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征对比——基于聚焦离子束氦离子显微镜(FIB-HIM)技术. 石油实验地质. 2018(05): 739-748 . 本站查看
    20. 曹晶晶，朱联强. 彭水地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩储层特征研究. 山东化工. 2018(22): 115-116+118 .

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.0 %FULLTEXT: 19.0 %META: 78.4 %META: 78.4 %PDF: 2.7 %PDF: 2.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.1 %其他: 4.1 %China: 0.7 %China: 0.7 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.3 %上海: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %东营: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %南里奥格兰德州: 0.3 %南里奥格兰德州: 0.3 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %张家口: 4.5 %张家口: 4.5 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %拉斯维加斯: 0.3 %拉斯维加斯: 0.3 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 40.2 %芒廷维尤: 40.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.4 %莫斯科: 0.4 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 38.2 %西宁: 38.2 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.6 %阿什本: 0.6 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %首尔: 0.4 %首尔: 0.4 %其他ChinaIndia三门峡上海东营临汾乌鲁木齐北京南里奥格兰德州台州哥伦布嘉兴天津张家口成都扬州拉斯维加斯新乡新加坡无锡晋城杭州武汉湖州湘潭漯河盘锦芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义锦州长沙长治阿什本青岛首尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1441) PDF downloads(481) Cited by(28)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return