Dong Xiufang, Xiong Yongxu. ON THE TYPE OF THE YINING BASIN AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGY[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1995, 17(1): 17-25. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199501017
Citation: Zhang Hao, Chen Gang, Zhu Yushuang, Dang Yongchao, Chen Juan, Wang Hengli, Si Yang, Bai Chao, Li Xue. Quantitative characterization of microscopic pore throat structure in tight sandstone oil reservoirs:A case study of Chang7 reservoir in Xin'anbian oil field, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(1): 112-119. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701112

Quantitative characterization of microscopic pore throat structure in tight sandstone oil reservoirs:A case study of Chang7 reservoir in Xin'anbian oil field, Ordos Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701112
  • Received Date: 2016-07-11
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-11-28
  • Publish Date: 2017-01-28
  • The Chang7tight sandstone oil reservoir in the Xin'anbian oil field in the Ordos Basin has good potential for hydrocarbon exploration. However, the studies of microscopic pore throat structure were limited, which restricted tight oil exploration and long-term development. Size, shape and spatial distribution of pore throats in tight oil reservoirs were studied in this paper by using scanning electron microscope (SEM), casting thin section, high-pressure mercury injection and Nano-CT technologies. Pores in the Chang7tight oil reservoir in the Xin'anbian oil field were divided into three categories, namely intergranular pores, dissolution pores and microfractures. A large number of nanoscale pore throats developed in this area, which contributed to reservoir capacity and permeability. Pore throat distributions on capillary pressure curves of different samples showed that when threshold pressure is less than 1MPa, there are many micron-sized pores with a good connectivity and pore throats are large tubular and striped with throat diameters being in the range of 100-380nm. When the threshold pressure ranges from 1to 3MPa, there are many nanoscale pores with a good connectivity locally, intragranular dissolution pores are developed and pore throats are tube bundle and spherical shape with throat diameter being in the range of 75-250nm. When the threshold pressure is greater than 3MPa, small isolated spherical nanopores occur, leading to a poor vertical connectivity, only local micro-fracture development provides storage space, and throat diameter is concentrated in the range of 15-75nm.

     

  • [1]
    贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-350. Jia Chengzao,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):343-350.
    [2]
    林森虎,邹才能,袁选俊,等.美国致密油开发现状及启示[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(4):25-30. Lin Senhu,Zou Caineng,Yuan Xuanjuan,et al.Status quo of tight oil exploitation in the United States and its implication[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(4):25-30.
    [3]
    Zhao Huawei,Ning Zhengfu,Wang Qing,et al.Petrophysical characterization of tight oil reservoirs using pressure-controlled porosimetry combined with rate-controlled porosimetry[J].Fuel,2015,154:233-242.
    [4]
    姚泾利,邓秀芹,赵彦德,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):150-158. Yao Jingli,Deng Xiuqin,Zhao Yande,et al.Characteristics of tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):150-158.
    [5]
    杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11. Yang Hua,Li Shixiang,Liu Xianyang.Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):1-11.
    [6]
    张文正,杨华,李剑锋,等.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用:强生排烃特征及机理分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):289-293. Zhang Wenzheng,Yang Hua,Li Jianfeng,et al.Leading effect of high-class source rock of Chang 7 in Ordos Basin on enrichment of low permeability oil-gas accumulation:Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion mechanism[J].Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment,2006,33(3):289-293.
    [7]
    邹才能,杨智,陶士振,等.纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):12-25. Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Tao Shizhen,et al.Nano-hydrocarbon and the accumulation in coexisting source and reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):12-25.
    [8]
    冯胜斌,牛小兵,刘飞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7致密油储层储集空间特征及其意义探讨[J].低渗透油气田,2012(3):26-30. Feng Shengbin,Niu Xiaobing,Liu Fei,et al.Exploring the characte-ristics and significance of reservoir space of Chang 7 tight oil reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J].Low Permeability Oil & Gas Fields,2012(3):26-30.
    [9]
    尤源,牛小兵,冯胜斌,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7致密油储层微观孔隙特征研究[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(6):18-23. You Yuan,Niu Xiaobing,Feng Shengbin,et al.Study of pore features in Chang7 tight oil reservoir,Yanchang layer,Ordos Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2014,38(6):18-23.
    [10]
    王秀娟,王明磊,赵爱彬.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7致密油储层微观特征[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):79-83. Wang Xiujuan,Wang Minglei,Zhao Aibin.Microscopic characteristics of Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoir in Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):79-83.
    [11]
    喻建,马捷,路俊刚,等.压汞-恒速压汞在致密储层微观孔喉结构定量表征中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地华池-合水地区长7储层为例[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(6):789-795. Yu Jian,Ma Jie,Lu Jungang,et al.Application of mercury injection and rate-controlled mercury penetration in quantitative characterization of microscopic pore structure of tight reservoirs:A case study of the Chang7 reservoir in Huachi-Heshui area,the Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(6):789-795.
    [12]
    王震亮.致密岩油的研究进展、存在问题和发展趋势[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(6):587-595. Wang Zhenliang.Research progress,existing problem and deve-lopment trend of tight rock oil[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(6):587-595.
    [13]
    Guo Xuejing,Shen Yinghao,He Shunli.Quantitative pore chara-cterization and the relationship between pore distributions and organic matter in shale based on Nano-CT image analysis:A case study for a lacustrine shale reservoir in the Triassic Chang 7 member,Ordos Basin,China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,27:1630-1640.
    [14]
    白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):329-333. Bai Bin,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Multi-scale method of Nano(Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):329-333.
    [15]
    赵卫卫,杨云祥,宋和平,等.鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾地区长7致密油地质特征及成藏主控因素[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(12):4267-4276. Zhao Weiwei,Yang Yunxiang,Song Heping,et al.Geological characteristics and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation in Chang 7 tight oil of Yanchang Formation of Xiasiwan area,Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2014,45(12):4267-4276.
    [16]
    屈红军,蒲仁海,曹金舟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部地区长7致密油储层特征[J].非常规油气,2015,2(1):1-9. Qu Hongjun,Pu Renhai,Cao Jinzhou,et al.Characteristics of Chang 7 tight oil reservoir in the southern Ordos Basin[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2015,2(1):1-9.
    [17]
    吴浩,牛小兵,张春林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段致密油储层可动流体赋存特征及影响因素[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(3):120-125. Wu Hao,Niu Xiaobing,Zhang Chunlin,et al.Characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in Chang 7 tight oil reservoir in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2015,34(3):120-125.
    [18]
    赵靖舟,白玉彬,曹青,等.鄂尔多斯盆地准连续型低渗透-致密砂岩大油田成藏模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(6):811-827. Zhao Jingzhou,Bai Yubin,Cao Qing,et al.Quasi-continuous hydrocarbon accumulation:A new pattern for large tight sand oilfields in the Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(6):811-827.
    [19]
    朱如凯,白斌,崔景伟,等.非常规油气致密储集层微观结构研究进展[J].古地理学报,2013,15(5):615-623. Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,Cui Jingwei,et al.Research advances of microstructure in unconventional tight oil and gas reservoirs[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(5):615-623.
    [20]
    杜金虎,何海清,杨涛,等.中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(1):1-9. Du Jinhu,He Haiqing,Yang Tao,et al.Progress in China's tight oil exploration and challenges[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(1):1-9.
    [21]
    屈乐,孙卫,杜环虹,等.基于CT扫描的三维数字岩心孔隙结构表征方法及应用:以莫北油田116井区三工河组为例[J].现代地质,2014,28(1):190-196. Qu Le,Sun Wei,Du Huanhong,et al.Characterization technique of pore structure by 3D digital core based on CT scanning and its application:An example from Sangonghe Formation of 116 well field in Mobei Oilfield[J].Geoscience,2014,28(1):190-196.
    [22]
    李传亮.孔喉比对地层渗透率的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(5):78-79. Li Chuanliang.Effect of pore-throat ratio on reservoir permeability[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2007,14(5):78-79.
    [23]
    高辉,孙卫.特低渗砂岩储层微观孔喉特征的定量表征[J].地质科技情报,2010,29(4):67-7. Gao Hui,Sun Wei.Quantitative characterization of micro-pore throat characteristics in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2010,29(4):67-7.
    [24]
    高辉,敬晓锋,张兰.不同孔喉匹配关系下的特低渗透砂岩微观孔喉特征差异[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(4):401-406. Gao Hui,Jing Xiaofeng,Zhang Lan.Difference of micro-pore throat characteristics in extra-low permeability sandstone of different pore throat matching relationship[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(4):401-406.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(32)

    1. 肖胜东,王震亮,潘星,王联国,朱立文,刘一婷. 演武地区延8段储层微观孔隙结构特征及成因. 断块油气田. 2024(01): 86-95+105 .
    2. Shu-Heng Du,Yong-Min Shi. Concise extraction and characterization of the pore-throat network in unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs: A new perspective. Petroleum Science. 2024(03): 1474-1487 .
    3. 王力,刘岩,曹茜,邓虎成,王亮,陈婷. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层孔喉结构分类评价. 东北石油大学学报. 2024(04): 41-53+137-138 .
    4. 方朝强,万金彬,杨林,夏阳,肖占山,赵建斌. 基于低温氮吸附实验的页岩油储层微观孔隙结构. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 19-26+42 .
    5. 牟蜚声,尹相东,陈世加,胡琮,张海峰,代林锋,陆奕帆. 新安边地区长7段黏土矿物对致密油富集的影响. 断块油气田. 2024(06): 985-991+1013 .
    6. 李爱芬,高子恒,景文龙,付帅师. 基于CT扫描的蒸汽驱岩心孔隙结构特征及相渗分析. 特种油气藏. 2023(01): 79-86 .
    7. 戴亚威,李爱荣,武富礼,袁珍,谢红兵. 靖边油田长4+5段储层特征及分类评价. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 14-20 .
    8. 贺斌,吴伟,杨满. 利用三维数字岩心技术评价低渗透砂砾岩储层孔隙结构. 非常规油气. 2023(03): 15-21 .
    9. 吴春燕,王宁,白薷,吴琳,马瑶. 新安边地区长7致密油储层孔隙结构对可动流体赋存的影响. 西北大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 318-326 .
    10. 卢振东,刘成林,臧起彪,吴育平,杨熙雅,阳宏,曾晓祥,李闻达. 高压压汞与核磁共振技术在致密储层孔隙结构分析中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区为例. 地质科技通报. 2022(03): 300-310 .
    11. 肖玲,胡榕,韩永林,雷宁,陈曦. 鄂尔多斯盆地新安边地区长7页岩油储层孔隙结构特征. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 284-293 .
    12. 孙灵辉,萧汉敏,谭龙,李博文,孙东盟,王鹏威. 致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构对比及差异机制研究. 地质学报. 2022(06): 2155-2172 .
    13. 代波,温怀英,任志远,王磊飞,康立恒,杨熙雅,刘成林,臧起彪. 安塞地区长7致密砂岩孔隙发育特征及其主控因素. 非常规油气. 2021(01): 51-59 .
    14. 张玉晔,赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征. 矿产勘查. 2021(02): 288-294 .
    15. 张代燕,户海胜,王英伟. 准噶尔盆地三叠系百口泉组特低渗砂砾岩储层孔喉结构定量表征. 特种油气藏. 2021(04): 23-29 .
    16. 曹江骏,罗静兰,马迪娜·马吾提汗,盛伟琰,毛倩茹,杨涛,邸文渊,宋昆鹏. 微观非均质性对砂砾岩储层致密化的影响机理:以准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷DN8井区上二叠统梧桐沟组为例. 地球科学. 2021(10): 3435-3452 .
    17. 李晓骁,任晓娟,田进,马焕焕. 定边X区长8储层孔隙特征及其对油水流动的影响. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2020(01): 41-49 .
    18. 马铨峥,杨胜来,杨龙,邹成,王君如. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密储层微观孔隙特征. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2020(06): 13-20 .
    19. 葛明娜,庞飞,包书景. 贵州遵义五峰组—龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙特征及其对含气性控制——以安页1井为例. 石油实验地质. 2019(01): 23-30 . 本站查看
    20. 高阳,王永诗,李孝军,李趁义. 基于岩石孔喉结构的致密砂岩分类方法——以济阳坳陷古近系为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(02): 32-41+59 .
    21. 党海龙,肖前华,高瑞民,戚志林,畅斌. 延长油田长7致密油储层CO_2驱替特征. 深圳大学学报(理工版). 2019(03): 298-303 .
    22. 盛军,杨晓菁,李纲,徐立,李雅楠,王靖茹,张彩燕,崔海栋. 基于多尺度X-CT成像的数字岩心技术在碳酸盐岩储层微观孔隙结构研究中的应用. 现代地质. 2019(03): 653-661+671 .
    23. 张文伟. 细粒沉积岩储层微观特征研究方法及应用——以大民屯凹陷安福屯地区S352井为例. 石油地质与工程. 2019(04): 11-15 .
    24. 汪贺,师永民,徐大卫,陈旋,李拉毛才旦. 非常规储层孔隙结构表征技术及进展. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(05): 21-30 .
    25. 邱隆伟,穆相骥,李浩,张军,乔雨朋,周士博. 杭锦旗地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层成岩作用对孔隙发育的影响. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(02): 42-50 .
    26. 王香增,赵习森,党海龙,肖前华,戚志林. 延长油田长7致密油储层流体可动用性特征. 科学技术与工程. 2018(09): 72-77 .
    27. 严强,张云峰,付航,姜美玲,王军,隋淑玲,付晗,郝芮,郭明翰. 运用高压压汞及扫描电镜多尺度表征致密砂岩储层微纳米级孔喉特征——以渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷义176区块沙四段致密砂岩储层为例. 石油实验地质. 2018(02): 280-287 . 本站查看
    28. 黎盼,孙卫,闫健,高永利,折文旭,杜堃. 鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8_1储层不同流动单元可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素. 石油实验地质. 2018(03): 362-371 . 本站查看
    29. 张鹏,张金功,赵谦平,畅斌,张亮,高飞,曹成,李康. 恒速压汞技术在定边长7致密砂岩储层微观孔喉空间表征中的应用. 西北大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(03): 423-430 .
    30. 李俊键,姜汉桥,周代余,杨子浩,陈文滨. 古油藏低矿化度水驱微观剩余油动用机理实验研究. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(05): 104-109 .
    31. 林旺,范洪富,王志平,童敏,王少军,刘立峰. 致密油藏体积压裂水平井产量预测研究. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(06): 107-113 .
    32. 张浩,陈刚,唐鑫,党永潮,邵飞,李莉,陈晨,贾然. 应用测井响应评价致密油储层成岩相:以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长7储层为例. 地质科技情报. 2017(03): 262-270 .

    Other cited types(23)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 17.6 %FULLTEXT: 17.6 %META: 79.6 %META: 79.6 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.1 %其他: 8.1 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %三门峡: 0.6 %三门峡: 0.6 %上海: 1.7 %上海: 1.7 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %加尔各答: 0.5 %加尔各答: 0.5 %北京: 4.5 %北京: 4.5 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %城南: 0.3 %城南: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.5 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.5 %张家口: 2.5 %张家口: 2.5 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %晋城: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %桂林: 0.5 %桂林: 0.5 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 55.7 %芒廷维尤: 55.7 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.3 %衢州: 1.6 %衢州: 1.6 %西宁: 11.2 %西宁: 11.2 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %连云港: 0.3 %连云港: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %锦州: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.9 %阿什本: 0.9 %阿萨姆邦: 0.9 %阿萨姆邦: 0.9 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %首尔: 0.2 %首尔: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaIndia[]三门峡上海中山临汾兰州加尔各答北京台州哥伦布城南宁波宣城平顶山弗吉尼亚州张家口成都扬州晋城桂林武汉湖州湘潭漯河盐城盘锦芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义郑州锦州长沙长治阿什本阿萨姆邦青岛首尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1139) PDF downloads(362) Cited by(55)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return