HU Degao, LIU Chao. Geological factors of well fracability in Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 20-24. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801020
Citation: HU Degao, LIU Chao. Geological factors of well fracability in Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 20-24. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801020

Geological factors of well fracability in Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801020
  • Received Date: 2017-10-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-12-13
  • Publish Date: 2018-01-28
  • Brittle mineral content, brittle index and horizontal stress difference coefficient of shale reservoirs are the main factors influencing shale fracability. The ①-⑤ layers from the Wufeng Formation to the first member of Longmaxi Formation in the Fuling shale gas field have similar brittle mineral content (>50%), brittle index (>50%), and horizontal stress difference coefficient (<0.2). Therefore, the above parameters can not be used effectively to evaluate the fracability of a single well in this block. Based on a large amount of single well data, the authors assessed the influence of various geological factors on the fracability of a single well by geological factors such as burial depth, structural form and fracture development characteristics. The results showed that:(1) Burial depth is the most important geological factor affecting single well fracability, and the greater the burial depth, the greater the difficulty of reservoir fracturing; (2) Structural morphology has a more obvious effect on fracturing, and fracturing is more difficult in negative structures than in positive ones; (3) The heterogeneity of natural fractures will also lead to the increased difficulty of fracturing, the difficulty of extending seam networks, affecting the effect of reservoir reconstruction and reducing the productivity of a single well.

     

  • [1]
    蒲泊伶,蒋有录,王毅,等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析[J].石油学报,2010,31(2):225-230. PU Boling,JIANG Youlu,WANG Yi,et al.Reservoir-forming conditions and favorable exploration zones of shale gas in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):225-230.
    [2]
    聂海宽,张金川,李玉喜.四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统页岩气聚集条件[J].石油学报,2011,32(6):959-967. NEI Haikuan,ZHANG Jinchuan,LI Yuxi.Accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):959-967.
    [3]
    邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653. ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.
    [4]
    王永辉,卢拥军,李永平,等.非常规储层压裂改造技术进展及应用[J].石油学报,2012,33(S1):149-158. WANG Yonghui,LU Yongjun,LI Yongping,et al.Progress and application of hydraulic fracturing technology in unconventional reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S1):149-158.
    [5]
    付永强,马发明,曾立新,等.页岩气藏储层压裂实验评价关键技术[J].天然气工业,2011,31(4):51-54. FU Yongqiang,MA Faming,ZENG Lixin,et al.Key techniques of experimental evaluation in the fracturing treatment for shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(4):51-54.
    [6]
    肖佳林.地质条件变化对涪陵页岩气井压裂的影响及对策[J].断块油气田,2016,23(5):668-672. XIAO Jialin.Influence of geological condition change on shale gas well fracturing in Fuling and its strategy[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2016,23(5):668-672.
    [7]
    邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187. ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Types,characteri-stics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
    [8]
    王松,杨洪志,赵金洲,等.页岩气井可压裂性综合评价方法研究及应用[J].油气地质与采收率,2016,23(2):121-126. WANG Song,YANG Hongzhi,ZHAO Jinzhou,et al.Research and application of comprehensive evaluation on fracability of shale gas wells[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2016,23(2):121-126.
    [9]
    何吉祥,姜瑞忠,孙洁,等.页岩气藏压裂水平井产量影响因素评价[J].特种油气藏,2016,23(4):96-100. HE Jixiang,JIANG Ruizhong,SUN Jie,et al.Multi-stage fractured horizontal well productivity evaluation in shale gas reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2016,23(4):96-100.
    [10]
    侯冰,陈勉,王凯,等.页岩储层可压性评价关键指标体系[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2014,27(6):42-49. HOU Bing,CHEN Mian,WANG Kai,et al.The key index system of fracability evaluation in gas shale reservior[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities,2014,27(6):42-49.
    [11]
    袁俊亮,邓金根,张定宇,等.页岩气储层可压裂性评价技术[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):523-527. YUAN Junliang,DENG Jin'gen,ZHANG Dingyu,et al.Fracability evaluation of shale-gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(3):523-527.
    [12]
    盛秋红,李文成.泥页岩可压性评价方法及其在焦石坝地区的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2016,31(4):1473-1479. SHENG Qiuhong,LI Wencheng.Evaluation method of shale fracability and its application in Jiaoshiba area[J].Progress in Geophysics,2016,31(4):1473-1479.
    [13]
    刘广峰,王文举,李雪娇,等.页岩气压裂技术现状及发展方向[J].断块油气田,2016,23(2):235-239. LIU Guangfeng,WANG Wenju,LI Xuejiao,et al.Technical advance and development direction of shale gas fracturing[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2016,23(2):235-239.
    [14]
    张汉荣,王强,倪楷,等.川东南五峰-龙马溪组页岩储层六性特征及主控因素分析[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(3):320-325. ZHANG Hanrong,WANG Qiang,NI Kai,et al.Six characteristics and main controlling factors of shale reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(3):320-325.
    [15]
    刘江涛,刘双莲,李永杰,等.焦石坝地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J].油气地质与采收率,2016,23(3):53-57. LIU Jiangtao,LIU Shuanglian,LI Yongjie,et al.Geochemistry characteristics and its geological significance of shale in the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Jiaoshiba area[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2016,23(3):53-57.
    [16]
    贾长贵,李双明,王海涛,等.页岩储层网络压裂技术研究与试验[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(6):106-112. JIA Changgui,LI Shuangming,WANG Haitao,et al.Shale reservoir network fracturing technology research and experiment[J].Engineering Sciences,2012,14(6):106-112.
    [17]
    左建平,谢和平,周宏伟,等.温度影响下煤层顶板砂岩的破坏机制及塑性特性[J].中国科学(E辑技术科学),2007,37(11):1394-1042. ZUO Jianping,XIE Heping,ZHOU Hongwei,et al.Thermal-mecha-nical coupled effect on fracture mechanism and plastic characteristics of sandstone[J].Science in China (Series E Technological Sciences),2007,50(6):833-843.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HUANG Zheng, ZHOU Yongqiang, HE Zixiao, LI Ming, YANG Tao, WANG Su, LI Qiang, ZHAO Ying, YIN Shuai. Development characteristics and controlling factors of fractures in deep-buried tight oil reservoirs of the 3rd member of Paleogene Hetaoyuan Formation in southeast An'peng area, Nanxiang Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(4): 845-854. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202404845
    [2]HUANG Zheng, ZHOU Yongqiang, HE Zixiao, LI Ming, YANG Tao, WANG Su, LI Qiang, ZHAO Ying, YIN Shuai. Development characteristics and controlling factors of fractures in deep-buried tight oil reservoirs of 3rd member of Paleogene Hetaoyuan Formation in southeast An'peng area, Nanxiang Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT.
    [3]YAN Zeyu, LIANG Bing, SUN Yaxiong, DUAN Hongliang, QIU Xuming. In-situ stress orientation and main controlling factors of deep shale reservoirs in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1187-1197. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061187
    [4]QIAN Ji'an, JIANG Yuqiang, LUO Tongtong, YANG Yixiao, FU Yonghong, CHEN Weiming, SUN Chaoya, WANG Zhanlei. Microscopic pore and fracture evolution characteristics and influencing factors during imbibition process of shale reservoirs: a case study of the first section of the first member of Longmaxi Formation, western Chongqing area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1336-1348. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061336
    [5]SUN Ke, XU Ke, CHEN Qinghua. Characterization of the length of structural fractures in low permeability reservoirs and its application: a case study of Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti areas, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(1): 160-169. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201160
    [6]LIU Yun, ZHANG Mengyin. Gas-bearing property evaluation by petrophysical logging in shale gas reservoirs: a case study in J area of Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(1): 128-135. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101128
    [7]FAN Jiawei, CHEN Kongquan, SHEN Junjun, ZHU Wei, TANG Xiehua, LI Junjun, WANG Pengwan, ZHANG Fang. Shale reservoir characteristics of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi formations in Dangyang synclinorium, Middle Yangtze region[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(1): 69-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001069
    [8]ZHAO Peirong. Optimization of target layer selection in shale gas horizontal wells[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(6): 1014-1023. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2020061014
    [9]YI Jizheng, WANG Chao. Differential pore development characteristics in various shale lithofacies of Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 13-19. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801013
    [10]LIU Meng, LIU Chao, SHU Zhiheng, LU Yongchao, GU Qian, TAN Congwen, XU Xiang. Heterogeneity characteristics and controlling factors of black shale in Jiaoshiba, Fuling, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 118-125. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801118
    [11]LUO Bing, YU Fei, CHEN Yalin, DING Hongwei. Structural features and preservation evaluation of shale gas reservoirs in the Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 103-109. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801103
    [12]WEN Fenggang, ZHU Yushuang, REN Zhanli, NI Jun, GAO Pengpeng. Reservoir porosity characteristics and controls of the Shanxi Formation shale reservoir, Yanchang area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(6): 778-785. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806778
    [13]GAN Yuqing, WANG Chao, FANG Dongliang, YANG Lanfang, ZHOU Xinke, ZHANG Ping. Element geochemical characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin and their significance to shale gas development[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 78-89. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801078
    [14]SUN Jian, BAO Hanyong. Comprehensive characterization of shale gas reservoirs: A case study from Fuling shale gas field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 1-12. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801001
    [15]ZHANG Mengyin, LI Zheng, WANG Jin, HAN Chiyu, LIU Shuang, QIAN Hua. Vertical variation of rocks and minerals in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin: A case study of well JYA[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 64-70. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801064
    [16]LIU Li, BAO Hanyong, LI Kai, LI Gen, ZENG Yong, ZHENG Aiwei, XIONG Hongli. Evaluation of gas content in shale reservoirs and analysis of influencing factors in Fuling shale gas field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 58-63. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801058
    [17]Hao Yunqing, Song Guoqi, Zhou Guangqing, Li Zheng, Wang Weiqing, Li Bo, Zhang Cunxia. Influence of petrological characteristics on fracability of the Paleogene shale, Jiyang Depression[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 489-495. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604489
    [18]Zhang Hanrong, Wang Qiang, Ni Kai, Li Chunyan. Six characteristics and main controlling factors of shale reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(3): 320-325. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603320
    [19]Song Zhenxiang, Li Zhongbo, Zhang Xi, Zhou Zhuoming, Yang Hao. Characteristics of shale gas reservoirs and evaluation of their gas potential in Sujiatun area, Lishu Fault Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(5): 606-613. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505606
    [20]Guo Haixuan, Guo Tiankui. Experimental evaluation of crushability of shale reservoirs in Luojia area, Shengli Oilfield[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(3): 339-346. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201303339
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(29)

    1. 杨晓斌,陈君青,张潇,王玉莹,火勋港,姜福杰,庞宏,施砍园,冉钧. 页岩弹性参数测量方法及影响因素综述. 石油与天然气地质. 2025(02): 630-653 .
    2. 周杨帆,罗良,曾联波,刘超,刘世强,犹钰玲,莫娟. 涪陵页岩气田白马构造带变形特征及页岩气成藏模式. 石油科学通报. 2024(02): 183-195 .
    3. 韩玲,徐峰. 潜江凹陷不同岩性碳酸盐岩储层可压裂性评价及压裂技术研究应用. 中国石油勘探. 2024(06): 170-184 .
    4. 胡德高,周林,包汉勇,刘皓天,刘超,孟志勇,赵帅,王建. 川东红星地区HY1井二叠系页岩气勘探突破及意义. 石油学报. 2023(02): 241-252 .
    5. 刘超,包汉勇,万云强,甘玉青,中国石化. 四川盆地涪陵气田白马区块效益开发实践与对策. 石油实验地质. 2023(06): 1050-1056 . 本站查看
    6. 郭大立,张书玲,王璇,甄怀宾,王成旺. 基于动态权函数的煤层可压性综合评价. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 97-104 .
    7. 周德华,戴城,方思冬,刘华. 基于嵌入式离散裂缝模型的页岩气水平井立体开发优化设计. 油气地质与采收率. 2022(03): 113-120 .
    8. 车世琦. 涪陵气田平桥区块页岩气选区评价. 石油地质与工程. 2022(04): 48-54 .
    9. 魏绍蕾,黄学斌,李军,苏映宏,潘立生. 基于概率法的页岩气单井最终可采量评估——以焦石坝页岩气田加密井为例. 石油实验地质. 2021(01): 161-168 . 本站查看
    10. 陆亚秋,梁榜,王超,刘超,吉靖. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田江东区块下古生界深层页岩气勘探开发实践与启示. 石油与天然气地质. 2021(01): 241-250 .
    11. 陆亚秋,王进,曹梦茜. 基于改进的层次分析法的页岩气开发选区评价方法. 油气藏评价与开发. 2021(02): 70-77 .
    12. 赵金洲,任岚,蒋廷学,胡东风,吴雷泽,吴建发,尹丛彬,李勇明,胡永全,林然,李小刚,彭瑀,沈骋,陈曦宇,尹庆,贾长贵,宋毅,王海涛,李远照,吴建军,曾斌,杜林麟. 中国页岩气压裂十年:回顾与展望. 天然气工业. 2021(08): 121-142 .
    13. 王桂庆. 页岩储层吸水特征及其对裂缝导流能力的影响. 断块油气田. 2020(01): 95-98 .
    14. 刘伟男,王敏. 基于矿物岩石力学特征差异的页岩储层脆性评价方法研究. 当代化工. 2020(02): 458-461+466 .
    15. 王欢,计秉玉,廖新维,伦增珉,吕成远,王友启. 致密油藏体积压裂水平井压力特征. 断块油气田. 2020(02): 217-223 .
    16. 马军. 页岩裂缝成因及其对含气性影响——以渝东南地区阳春沟构造带五峰—龙马溪组为例. 油气藏评价与开发. 2020(03): 126-134 .
    17. 何颂根,龙永平,李永明,颜晋川. 超深海相碳酸盐岩储层可压性主控因素. 断块油气田. 2020(05): 573-578 .
    18. 刘立之. 涪陵页岩气田变方位水平井压裂工艺优化与应用. 钻采工艺. 2020(04): 47-50+8 .
    19. 夏遵义,马海洋,房堃. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷陆相页岩储层岩石力学特征及可压裂性研究. 石油实验地质. 2019(01): 134-141 . 本站查看
    20. 高东伟. 页岩气水平井压裂细分段密分簇优化设计及应用. 长江大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(04): 40-43+5 .
    21. 赖富强,冷寒冰,龚大建,巨明皓,张国统,艾亚军. 综合矿物组分和弹性力学参数的页岩脆性评价方法. 断块油气田. 2019(02): 168-171+186 .
    22. 李宪文,赵振峰,李喆,王文东,丛海龙. 随机分形压裂水平井缝网参数反演方法. 断块油气田. 2019(02): 205-209 .
    23. 崔春兰,董振国,吴德山. 湖南保靖区块龙马溪组岩石力学特征及可压性评价. 天然气地球科学. 2019(05): 626-634 .
    24. 沈骋,赵金洲,任岚,范宇. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气缝网压裂改造甜点识别新方法. 天然气地球科学. 2019(07): 937-945 .
    25. 邹春,兰凯,王爱宽,刘香峰,孔华. 涪陵页岩气井水平段一趟钻技术实践与认识. 内蒙古石油化工. 2019(06): 64-67 .
    26. 王涛,申峰,展转盈,马振锋,刘云,侯云翌. 高强微弹水泥浆在延长油田致密油水平井中的应用. 石油钻探技术. 2019(05): 40-48 .
    27. MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong. China's shale gas exploration and development: Understanding and practice. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2018(04): 589-603 .
    28. 冯月丽,刘月田,丁祖鹏,陈健,毛小龙,周月波. 一组平行裂缝变形特征及动态渗透率模型. 断块油气田. 2018(06): 736-741 .
    29. 马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践. 石油勘探与开发. 2018(04): 561-574 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.6 %FULLTEXT: 21.6 %META: 75.8 %META: 75.8 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.1 %其他: 5.1 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %东营: 0.1 %东营: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %九江: 0.4 %九江: 0.4 %云浮: 0.8 %云浮: 0.8 %北京: 4.1 %北京: 4.1 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.4 %卡尔加里: 0.4 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %张家口: 2.4 %张家口: 2.4 %徐州: 0.4 %徐州: 0.4 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.4 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.4 %盘锦: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 41.2 %芒廷维尤: 41.2 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %莫斯科: 0.7 %莫斯科: 0.7 %西宁: 32.7 %西宁: 32.7 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.3 %阿什本: 0.3 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %首尔: 0.4 %首尔: 0.4 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaIndiaKorea Republic of三门峡上海东营临汾九江云浮北京十堰南京卡尔加里大同天津宣城张家口徐州新乡无锡晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉江门深圳湘潭漯河盘锦秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科西宁贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆长春长沙长治阿什本青岛首尔驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1493) PDF downloads(623) Cited by(34)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return