Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America

GAO Hui; HE Mengqing; ZHAO Pengyun; DOU Liangbin; WANG Chen

doi:10.11781/sysydz201802133

Volume 40 Issue 2

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2018 > 40(2): 133-140

GAO Hui, HE Mengqing, ZHAO Pengyun, DOU Liangbin, WANG Chen. Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(2): 133-140. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802133

Citation:

GAO Hui, HE Mengqing, ZHAO Pengyun, DOU Liangbin, WANG Chen. Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(2): 133-140. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802133

Citation:

GAO Hui, HE Mengqing, ZHAO Pengyun, DOU Liangbin, WANG Chen. Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(2): 133-140. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802133

PDF( 2823 KB)

Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802133

1.
School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
2. Engineering Research Center of Developmentand Management for Low to Extra-Low Permeability Oil & Gas Reservoirs in West China, Ministry of Education, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
3. No. 11 Oil Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Qingyang, Gansu 745000, China
4. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received Date: 2017-10-13
Rev Recd Date: 2018-01-18
Publish Date: 2018-03-28

Abstract

Abstract

The Chang 7 shale oil in the Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin was studied using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, high pressure mercury penetration, and gas isothermal adsorption. The formation was compared with typical shale oil in North America from four aspects including geological conditions, source rock characteristics, mineral composition, and reservoir space types. The results showed that both the Chang 7 shale oil and the typical shale oil in North America were deposited in a low energy environment, and the stable sedimentary environment was beneficial to shale oil accumulation. The organic matter type and maturity of source rocks in Chang 7 and North America are similar. The TOC content of Chang 7 shale oil is 2% to 18%, which is higher than that of the Eagle Ford shale. Thus, the Chang 7 source rocks are considered to have a great potential for oil production. The brittle mineral content of Chang 7 shale oil is 69.73%, only 1.27% lower than the typical shale oil in North America, indicating that the shale of Chang 7 formation is amenable to fracturing. Compared with the typical shale oil in North America, the Chang 7 shale oil has poor porosity and permeability (0.5%-2.1% and (0.000 4-0.03)×10^-3 μm², respectively). Micro-cracks and organic pores were well developed in typical shale oil in North America, while the organic pores in Chang 7 shale oil are scattered, and the reservoir space is mainly composed of intergranular pores, intragranular pores and micro-cracks. It can be concluded that the Chang 7 shale oil has the same oil accumulation pattern and mineral composition as the typical shale oil in North America. However, the Chang 7 shale oil has poor physical properties and a dense reservoir. Therefore, it has great resource potential and high development difficulty.
- mineral composition,
- reservoir space,
- shale oil in North America,
- Chang 7 shale oil,
- Ordos Basin

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11. YANG Hua,LI Shixiang,LIU Xianyang.Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):1-11.
[2]	卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(6):928-932. LU Jincai,LI Yuhong,WEI Xianyang,et al.Research on the depositional environment and resources potential of the oil shale in the Chang 7 member,Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2006,36(6):928-932.
[3]	昌燕,刘人和,拜文华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系油页岩地质特征及富集规律[J].非常规油气,2012,17(2):74-78. CHANG Yan,LIU Renhe,BAI Wenhua,et al.Geologic characteristic and regular pattern of Triassic oil shale south of Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2012,17(2):74-78.
[4]	张文正,杨华,杨奕华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7优质烃源岩的岩石学、元素地球化学特征及发育环境[J].地球化学,2008,37(1):59-64. ZHANG Wenzheng,YANG Hua,YANG Yihua,et al.Petrology and element geochemistry and development environment of Yanchang Formation Chang-7 high quality source rocks in Ordos Basin[J].Geochimica,2008,37(1):59-64.
[5]	杨华,张文正.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用:地质地球化学特征[J].地球化学,2005,34(2):147-154. YANG Hua,ZHANG Wenzheng.Leading effect of the seventh member high-quality source rock of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin during the enrichment of low-penetrating oil-gas accumulation:Geology and geochemistry[J].Geochimica,2005,34(2):147-154.
[6]	张烨毓,周文,唐瑜,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7油层组页岩储层特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(6):671-676. ZHANG Yeyu,ZHOU Wen,TANG Yu,et al.Characteristics of shale reservoir rocks in member 7 of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2013,40(6):671-676.
[7]	吴松涛,邹才能,朱如凯,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统长7段泥页岩储集性能[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2015,40(11):1810-1823. WU Songtao,ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,et al.Reservoir quality characterization of Upper Triassic Chang 7 shale in Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences),2015,40(11):1810-1823.
[8]	邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864. ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,BAI Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
[9]	CURTIS J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
[10]	LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
[11]	SONDERGELD C H,AMBROSE R J,RAI C S,et al.Micro-structural studies of gas shales[R].SPE 131771,2010.
[12]	高占京,郑和荣,黄韬.美国俄克拉荷马州伍德福德页岩甜点控制因素研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(3):340-345. GAO Zhanjing,ZHENG Herong,HUANG Tao.Attributes of sweet spots in the Devonian Woodford shales in Oklahoma,USA[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(3):340-345.
[13]	林森虎,邹才能,袁选俊,等.美国致密油开发现状及启示[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(4):25-30. LIN Senhu,ZOU Caineng,YUAN Xuanjun,et al.Status quo of tight oil exploitation in the United States and its implication[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(4):25-30.
[14]	张林晔,李钜源,李政,等.北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(6):700-711. ZHANG Linye,LI Juyuan,LI Zheng,et al.Advancements in shale oil/gas research in North American and considerations on exploration for lacustrine shale oil/gas in China[J].Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(6):700-711.
[15]	赵俊龙,张君峰,许浩,等.北美典型致密油地质特征对比及分类[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(1):44-50. ZHAO Junlong,ZHANG Junfeng,XU Hao,et al.Comparison of geological characteristics and types of typical tight oil in North America[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(1):44-50.
[16]	李倩,卢双舫,李文浩,等.威利斯顿盆地和西墨西哥湾盆地致密油成藏差异[J].新疆石油地质,2016,37(6):741-747. LI Qian,LU Shuangfang,LI Wenhao,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation differences of tight oil between Williston Basin and Western Gulf of Mexico Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(6):741-747.
[17]	邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26. ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,CUI Jingwei,et al.Formation mechanism,geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):14-26.
[18]	郭凯.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段有效烃源岩及生排烃研究[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(1):15-23. GUO Kai.Active source rocks of Chang 7 member and hydrocarbon generation and expulsion characteristics in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(1):15-23.
[19]	吴康军,刘洛夫,徐正建,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油成藏物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(1):63-69. WU Kangjun,LIU Luofu,XU Zhengjian,et al.Lower limits of pore throat radius,porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 Member,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(1):63-69.
[20]	SMITH M G,BUSTIN R M.Production and preservation of organic matter during deposition of the Bakken Formation (Late Devonian and Early Mississippian),Williston Basin[J].Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,1998,142(3/4):185-200.
[21]	WALPER J L,ROWETT C L.Plate tectonics and the origin of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico[J].GCAGS Transactions,1972,22:105-106.
[22]	SALVADOR A.Late Triassic-Jurassic paleogeography and origin of Gulf of Mexico Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1987,71(4):419-451.
[23]	张妮妮,刘洛夫,苏天喜,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段与威利斯顿盆地Bakken组致密油形成条件的对比及其意义[J].现代地质,2013,27(5):1120-1130. ZHANG Nini,LIU Luofu,SU Tianxi,et al.Comparison of Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin with Bakken Formation in Williston Basin and Its significance[J].Geoscience,2013,27(5):1120-1130.
[24]	BAI B J,ELGMATI M,ZHANG H,et al.Rock characterization of Fayetteville shale gas plays[J].Fuel,2013,105:645-652.
[25]	MODICA C J,LAPIERRE S G.Estimation of kerogen porosity in source rocks as a function of thermal transformation:Example from the Mowry shale in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(1):87-108.
[26]	曾祥亮,刘树根,黄文明,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):372-384. ZENG Xiangliang,LIU Shugen,HUANG Wenming,et al.Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):372-384.
[27]	SONNENBERG S A,PRAMUDITO A.Petroleum geology of the giant Elm Coulee field,Williston Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(9):1127-1153.
[28]	郝运轻,宋国奇,周广清,等.济阳坳陷古近系泥页岩岩石学特征对可压性的影响[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(4):489-495. HAO Yunqing,SONG Guoqi,ZHOU Guangqing,et al.Influence of petrological characteristics on fracability of the Paleogene shale,Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(4):489-495.
[29]	LOUCK R G,RUPPEL S C.Mississippian Barnett shale:Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):579-601.
[30]	宋磊,宁正福,孙一丹,等.联合压汞法表征致密油储层孔隙结构[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(5):700-705. SONG Lei,NING Zhengfu,SUN Yidan,et al.Pore structure characterization of tight oil reservoirs by a combined mercury method[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(5):700-705.
[31]	杨华,牛小兵,徐黎明,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油勘探潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):511-520. YANG Hua,NIU Xiaobing,XU Liming,et al.Exploration potential of shale oil in Chang 7 Member,Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration & Development,2016,43(4):511-520.
[32]	KUHN P P,DI PRIMIO R,HILL R,et al.Three-dimensional modeling study of the low-permeability petroleum system of the Bakken Formation[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(10):1867-1897.
[33]	MARTIN R,BAIHLY J D,MALPANI R,et al.Understanding production from Eagle Ford-Austin chalk system[R].SPE 145117,2011:1-28.
[34]	FISHMAN N.Linking diagenesis with depositional environments as it bears on pore types and hydrocarbon storage:An example from the Cretaceous Eagle Ford Formation,South Texas[R].Tulsa:Geological Society Dinner Meeting,2015.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHONG Hongli, CHEN Lihua, ZHANG Fengqi, LIANG Yongqi. Pore evolution in tight sandstone and its impact on oil saturation: a case study of Chang 6 to Chang 8 reservoirs in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ganquan area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1145-1156. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061145
[2]	WANG Liangjun, YUE Xinxin, LI Liansheng, WANG Yanpeng. Pore development characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoir in the seventh member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Xunyi area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1135-1144. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061135
[3]	WU Kai, GAO Juanqin, XIE Guwei, YANG Weiwei, LUO Lirong, LI Shanpeng. Characteristics of Chang 7 shale gas reservoirs in Triassic Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin and its exploration and development prospects[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1298-1311. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061298
[4]	ZHANG Linlin, WANG Kongjie, LAI Fengpeng, GUO Wei, MIAO Lili. Classification and evaluation of sweet spots of marine shale gas reservoir in Ordovician Wulalike Formation on the westen margin of Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(1): 191-201. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202401191
[5]	ZHANG Linlin, WANG Kongjie, LAI Fengpeng, GUO Wei, MIAO Lili. Classification and evaluation of sweet spots of marine shale gas reservoir in Ordovician Wulalike Formation on the westen margin of Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT.
[6]	PENG Jun, ZHANG Xinyi, XU Tianyu, CHENG Lixue, ZHANG Kun, LI Bin. Lithofacies characteristics and reservoir capacity of fine-grained sedimentary rocks of second member of Qianfoya Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(2): 247-262. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402247
[7]	HONG Haitao, LU Jungang, QIN Chunyu, ZHANG Shaomin, ZHANG Rui, ZHOU Yixin, XIAO Zhenglu, ZHOU Hongfei, HAN Luyuan. Shale oil reservoir characteristics and exploration implication in Da'anzhai Member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(1): 11-21. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202401011
[8]	GAO Yuqiao, CAI Xiao, XIA Wei, WU Yanyan, CHEN Yunyan. Characteristics of reservoir space and sweet spot evaluation of shale oil in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Subei Basin: a case study of well QY1 in Qintong Sag[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(5): 916-926. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202405916
[9]	LI Ming, LIAO Jing, WANG Su, HE Zixiao, WANG Huiwei, WANG Jun, HE Hui, ZHU Yushuang. Imbibition characteristics and influencing factors of reservoirs with ultra-low permeability of Ordos Basin: a case study of third member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Weibei Oil Field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(6): 971-980. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206971
[10]	LI Jin, WANG Xuejun, ZHOU Kai, WANG Yunsuo, LI Ningchao, WU Ying, WANG Meige. Characteristics of ultra-deep shale reservoir of marine-continental transitional facies: a case study of lower member of Upper Permian Longtan Formation in well Y4, Puguang Gas Field, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(1): 71-84. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201071
[11]	YANG Zhifeng, TANG Yong, GUO Xuguang, HUANG Liliang, WANG Ziqiang, ZHAO Xinmei. Occurrence states and potential influencing factors of shale oil in the Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 784-796. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105784
[12]	DING Xiaoqi, LIU Xin, QI Zhuangzhuang, ZHANG Wei, LIU Sihong. Reservoir space characterization of vuggy carbonate reservoirs with multiple scales: a case study of Ma 5-7 interval, Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation, Daniudi area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 689-696. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104689
[13]	LIU Weixin, LU Longfei, WEI Zhihong, YU Lingjie, ZHANG Wentao, XU Chenjie, YE Deliao, SHEN Baojian, FAN Ming. Microstructure characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoirs with different depth, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 378-386. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003378
[14]	MAO Junli, ZHANG Jinchuan, LIU Tong, DING Jianghui. Laminated texture of shale and its storage space significance in Western Depression, Liaohe Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(1): 113-120. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901113
[15]	CHENG Chao, LIN Haiyu, JIANG Yuqiang, FENG Lei, XIA Yu, MU Chunhao. Thermal conductivity of gas-bearing shale of the Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(2): 289-294. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201902289
[16]	WEN Fenggang, ZHU Yushuang, REN Zhanli, NI Jun, GAO Pengpeng. Reservoir porosity characteristics and controls of the Shanxi Formation shale reservoir, Yanchang area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(6): 778-785. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806778
[17]	WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, NIE Haikuan, LIU Zhongbao, CHEN Qian, GAO Bo, LIU Guangxiang, GONG Dajian. Comparative analysis and discussion of shale reservoir characteristics in the Wufeng-Longmaxi and Niutitang formations: a case study of the well JY1 in SE Sichuan Basin and well TX1 in SE Guizhou area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(5): 639-649. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805639
[18]	Liu Weixin, Bao Fang, Yu Lingjie, Zhang Wentao, Zhang Qingzheng, Lu Longfei, Fan Ming. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453
[19]	Yao Jingli, Chen Shijia, Lu Jungang, Zhang Huanxu, Liu Chaowei, Tang Haiping, Wang Gang, Zhang Bowei. Features and influencing factors of Chang 7 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Hujianshan area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(2): 162-166. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302162
[20]	Liu Weifu, Zhu Xiaomin. RESERVOIR SPACE EVOLUTION OF VOLCANIC ROCKS IN THE YINGCHENG FORMATION OF THE XUJIAWEIZI FAULT DEPRESSION, THE SONGLIAO BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2005, 27(1): 44-49. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200501044

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(44)

1.	张奎华，王越，于洪洲，周健，汪誉新，宋梅远，倪胜利. 中国东西部陆相页岩油地质特征差异性分析及其对富集规律影响——以胜利探区为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2024(04): 42-59 .
2.	张娟，张晓辉，许珍萍，曹青，余林瑶. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段页岩油赋存状态及开发特征. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 10-18 .
3.	云露，何希鹏，花彩霞，昝灵. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系陆相页岩油成藏地质特征及资源潜力. 石油学报. 2023(01): 176-187 .
4.	刘惠民，王勇，李军亮，张鹏飞，张顺，魏晓亮，秦峰. 济阳坳陷始新统页岩岩相发育主控因素及分布特征. 古地理学报. 2023(04): 752-767 .
5.	孙欣华，党海龙，曹尚，张鸣，康胜松，奥洋洋. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩储层长岩心注水实验. 科学技术与工程. 2023(27): 11605-11614 .
6.	潘永帅，黄志龙，郭小波，李天军，范谭广，徐雄飞. 火山灰影响下的湖相富有机质页岩油成藏条件分析——以三塘湖盆地条湖-马朗凹陷芦草沟组为例. 地质学报. 2022(03): 1053-1068 .
7.	刘惠民. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油地质特殊性及勘探实践——以沙河街组四段上亚段—沙河街组三段下亚段为例. 石油学报. 2022(05): 581-594 .
8.	李阳，赵清民，吕琦，薛兆杰，曹小朋，刘祖鹏. 中国陆相页岩油开发评价技术与实践. 石油勘探与开发. 2022(05): 955-964 .
9.	LI Yang，ZHAO Qingmin，LYU Qi，XUE Zhaojie，CAO Xiaopeng，LIU Zupeng. Evaluation technology and practice of continental shale oil development in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2022(05): 1098-1109 .
10.	朱洁琼，李晓寒，尹恒，郭浩，卢政环，廖飞燕，时阳，安天下，魏晓亮. 北部湾盆地福山凹陷流沙港组页岩特征及页岩油气资源潜力. 中国海上油气. 2022(06): 65-79 .
11.	刘惠民，李军亮，刘鹏，王鑫，王勇，邱贻博，李政，王伟庆. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向. 石油学报. 2022(12): 1717-1729 .
12.	刘涛，来轩昂，蒋传杰，殷桂琴，冀忠伦，夏良玉. 中美页岩油发展经济性比较研究——基于鄂尔多斯延长组长7段与威利斯顿巴肯组的对比. 国际石油经济. 2022(12): 98-106 .
13.	刘玉瑞. 苏北—南黄海盆地白垩纪—古近纪淡水有孔虫的发现及其意义. 石油实验地质. 2021(01): 1-13+95 . 本站查看
14.	王圣柱. 准噶尔盆地博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组岩相类型及页岩油储集特征. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2021(01): 1-16 .
15.	聂银兰，谢庆宾，朱筱敏，张美洲. 基于岩相表征的细粒沉积物沉积机制和研究展望. 断块油气田. 2021(03): 305-310 .
16.	张亚雄. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部地区三叠系延长组7段暗色泥岩烃源岩特征. 石油与天然气地质. 2021(05): 1089-1097 .
17.	李国欣，刘国强，侯雨庭，赵先然，吴金龙，李伸专，鲜成刚，刘合. 陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法. 石油学报. 2021(11): 1405-1416 .
18.	李建雄，张静，张栋，白航航，师翔，师永民. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩储层微观原油空间分布类型——以新安边油田安83区块长7为例. 当代化工研究. 2021(24): 27-29 .
19.	尚彦军，赵斌，胡瑞林，邵鹏. 不同边长及分辨率下陆相页岩微孔隙非均质特性分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地瑶科1井长7~2页岩为例. 石油实验地质. 2020(01): 156-162 . 本站查看
20.	宋明水，刘惠民，王勇，刘雅利. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践. 石油勘探与开发. 2020(02): 225-235 .
21.	杨晓兰. 埃及西沙漠盆地中生界烃源岩特征及剩余资源分布. 石油与天然气地质. 2020(02): 423-433 .
22.	SONG Mingshui，LIU Huimin，WANG Yong，LIU Yali. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2020(02): 242-253 .
23.	昝灵. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷北港次洼古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集特征及主控因素. 石油实验地质. 2020(04): 618-624 . 本站查看
24.	白国平，邱海华，邓舟舟，王文庸，陈君. 美国页岩油资源分布特征与主控因素研究. 石油实验地质. 2020(04): 524-532 . 本站查看
25.	柳波，刘阳，刘岩，贺君玲，高逸飞，王浩力，范晶，付晓飞. 低熟页岩电加热原位改质油气资源潜力数值模拟——以松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区嫩江组一、二段为例. 石油实验地质. 2020(04): 533-544 . 本站查看
26.	李志明，钱门辉，黎茂稳，蒋启贵，吴世强，鲍云杰，曹婷婷，陶国亮，刘鹏，徐二社，刘伟新. 盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜3~4-10韵律为例. 石油实验地质. 2020(04): 513-523 . 本站查看
27.	薛永安，王飞龙，汤国民，李新琦. 渤海海域页岩油气地质条件与勘探前景. 石油与天然气地质. 2020(04): 696-709 .
28.	林会喜，王圣柱，杨艳艳，刘晓敏. 博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组页岩油储集特征. 断块油气田. 2020(04): 418-423 .
29.	王圣柱. 博格达山山前带芦草沟组不同岩相储集特征及含油性. 新疆石油地质. 2020(04): 402-413 .
30.	曹元婷，潘晓慧，李菁，邹阳. 关于吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油的思考. 新疆石油地质. 2020(05): 622-630 .
31.	霍秋立，曾花森，付丽，张晓畅，范庆华. 松辽盆地北部青一段泥页岩储集特征及孔隙演化. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2019(01): 1-8 .
32.	夏遵义，马海洋，房堃. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷陆相页岩储层岩石力学特征及可压裂性研究. 石油实验地质. 2019(01): 134-141 . 本站查看
33.	赖富强，冷寒冰，龚大建，巨明皓，张国统，艾亚军. 综合矿物组分和弹性力学参数的页岩脆性评价方法. 断块油气田. 2019(02): 168-171+186 .
34.	黄兴，李天太，王香增，高辉，倪军，赵金省，王琛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例. 石油学报. 2019(05): 557-567 .
35.	孟越，孟康，李艳，曹丽，李兰琴. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞南延长组长7层烃源岩评价. 化工管理. 2019(21): 205-206 .
36.	刘玉瑞. 苏北盆地源岩无双峰生烃和未低熟油. 石油实验地质. 2019(04): 461-474 . 本站查看
37.	支东明，宋永，何文军，贾希玉，邹阳，黄立良. 准噶尔盆地中—下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向. 新疆石油地质. 2019(04): 389-401 .
38.	刘雅利，刘鹏. 陆相富有机质泥页岩中夹层特征及其作用——以济阳坳陷为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(05): 1-9 .
39.	姜志高，曹海虹，丁安徐，高和群. 基于页岩现场含气量测试结果预测产能的方法. 石油实验地质. 2019(05): 773-778 . 本站查看
40.	王保华，李浩，陆建林，吕剑虹，王苗，赵琳洁. 陆相页岩层系非泥页岩夹层发育程度定量表征. 石油实验地质. 2019(06): 879-884 . 本站查看
41.	宋世骏，柳益群，郑庆华，周鼎武，付瑜. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组黑色岩系成因探讨——以铜川地区长7_3段为例. 沉积学报. 2019(06): 1117-1128 .
42.	杨春城，李存荣，侯堡怀，尚立涛，王海涛. 体积压裂技术在大庆页岩油YX-1井的应用. 采油工程. 2019(04): 7-11+80 .
43.	蒲秀刚，金凤鸣，韩文中，时战楠，蔡爱兵，王爱国，官全胜，姜文亚，张伟. 陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例. 石油学报. 2019(08): 997-1012 .
44.	孙元伟，程远方，张卫防，时凤霞，印树明. 致密储层应力敏感性分析及裂缝参数优化. 断块油气田. 2018(04): 493-497 .

Other cited types(18)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (2010) PDF downloads(547)