BAO Yunjie, LI Zhiming, YANG Zhenheng, QIAN Menhui, LIU Peng, TAO Guoliang. Porosity measurement error and its control method[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(4): 593-597. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904593
Citation: BAO Yunjie, LI Zhiming, YANG Zhenheng, QIAN Menhui, LIU Peng, TAO Guoliang. Porosity measurement error and its control method[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(4): 593-597. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904593

Porosity measurement error and its control method

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904593
  • Received Date: 2019-01-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-05-20
  • Publish Date: 2019-07-28
  • With the expansion of oil and gas exploration, the lithology and morphology of porosity test samples show diverse development trends. Porosity measurement faces new challenges because the same sample may have different laboratory porosity measurement results, limiting the application of porosity data. Starting from two key parameters of the total volume and skeleton volume of the rock sample, the influence of test error on the porosity measurement results was analyzed. It is found that when the relative error of the test is 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5%, the absolute error of porosity is 0.5, 0.9 and 1.4, respectively. The test error of the two has similar influence on the accuracy of porosity measurement, and should be effectively controlled. The current situation of error control of rock sample skeleton volume and total volume was analyzed. Volume testing relies on more mature methods and devices, and its test error can be effectively controlled. The development of total volume testing technology lags behind. The acquisition of key parameters in the measurement process is affected by random human factors, resulting in differences between different operators and different laboratory results. The method for effectively controlling porosity measurement error was discussed. A total sample volume measurement system for rock samples based on the fluid density determination principle was introduced, which has no restrictive requirements on the lithology and morphology of the sample, and automates the determination of the total volume of rock sample. The influence of human factors on the test can be reduced. The average relative error of the total volume of rock sample is 0.5%, and the absolute error of porosity measurement can be controlled to about 0.5, which can be used to narrow the difference of measurement results in different laboratories.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    古茜.页岩气储层孔隙度测量方法综述及展望[J].国外测井技术,2017,38(6):19-24.

    GU Qian.Review and prospect of porosity measurement methods for shale gas reservoirs[J].World Well Logging Technology,2017,38(6):19-24.
    [2]
    孙建孟,宗成林,董旭,等.基于核磁共振的页岩粉碎样品孔隙度研究[J].测井技术,2017,41(5):512-516.

    SUN Jianmeng,ZONG Chenglin,DONG Xu,et al.Porosity measurement of crushed shales using NMR[J].Well Logging Technology,2017,41(5):512-516.
    [3]
    杨泽皓,董明哲,宫厚健,等.测量页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度的新方法[J].石油学报,2015,36(4):482-489.

    YANG Zehao,DONG Mingzhe,GONG Houjian,et al.A new method to measure radial permeability and porosity of shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(4):482-489.
    [4]
    杨巍,薛莲花,唐俊,等.页岩孔隙度测量实验方法分析与评价[J].沉积学报,2015,33(6):1258-1264.

    YANG Wei,XUE Lianhua,TANG Jun,et al.Analysis and evaluation of different measuring methods for shale porosity[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(6):1258-1264.
    [5]
    魏亚强,李国敏,董艳辉.三维激光扫描与气体置换联合测定岩石有效孔隙率[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(4):212-216.

    WEI Yaqiang,LI Guomin,DONG Yanhui.Determinating effective porosity by the combination of three-dimensional laser scanning and gas displacement[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2015,34(4):212-216.
    [6]
    李军,武清钊,路菁,等.页岩气储层总孔隙度与有效孔隙度测量及测井评价:以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气储层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(3):602-609.

    LI Jun,WU Qingzhao,LU Jing,et al.Measurement and logging evaluation of total porosity and effective porosity of shale gas reservoirs:a case from the Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale in the Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(3):602-609.
    [7]
    刘淑芹,汪秀一,徐喜庆,等.孔隙度、渗透率测定结果差异性[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(1):76-79.

    LIU Shuqin,WANG Xiuyi,XU Xiqing,et al.Differences in the tested results of the porosity and permeability[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2016,35(1):76-79.
    [8]
    张涛,张希巍.页岩孔隙定性与定量方法的对比研究[J].天然气勘探与开发,2017,40(4):34-43.

    ZHANG Tao,ZHANG Xiwei.Comparative study on qualitative and quantitative methods for shale pore characterization[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2017,40(4):34-43.
    [9]
    李新,刘鹏,罗燕颖,等.页岩气储层岩心孔隙度测量影响因素分析[J].地球物理学进展,2015,30(5):2181-2187.

    LI Xin,LIU Peng,LUO Yanying,et al.Analysis of influencing factors on porosity measurement of shale gas reservoir core[J].Progress in Geophysics,2015,30(5):2181-2187.
    [10]
    陈思宇,田华,柳少波,等.致密储层样品体积测量对孔隙度误差的影响[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(6):850-856.

    CHEN Siyu,TIAN Hua,LIU Shaobo,et al.Influence of bulk volume measurement on porosity error in tight reservoir core plug analysis[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(6):850-856.
    [11]
    付永红,司马立强,张楷晨,等.页岩岩心气测孔隙度测量参数初探与对比[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(3):144-148.

    FU Yonghong,SIMA Liqiang,ZHANG Kaichen,et al.Preliminary study and comparison of shale core gas-porosity test parameters[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(3):144-148.
    [12]
    鲍云杰,鲍芳,李志明.基于磁性液体的岩样总体积测试方法[J].计测技术,2014,34(1):39-41.

    BAO Yunjie,BAO Fang,LI Zhiming.Method of measuring total volume of rock samples based on magnetic fluid[J].Metrology & Measurement Technology,2014,34(1):39-41.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1909) PDF downloads(213) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return