Shale gas resource evaluation based on "pressure coefficient": a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin

CHEN Feiran; DUAN Jinbao; ZHANG Hanrong; WEI Xiangfeng; LIU Zhujiang; WANG Qiang; YU Guangchun

doi:10.11781/sysydz202003405

Volume 42 Issue 3

May 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2020 > 42(3): 405-414

CHEN Feiran, DUAN Jinbao, ZHANG Hanrong, WEI Xiangfeng, LIU Zhujiang, WANG Qiang, YU Guangchun. Shale gas resource evaluation based on 'pressure coefficient': a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 405-414. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003405

Citation:

CHEN Feiran, DUAN Jinbao, ZHANG Hanrong, WEI Xiangfeng, LIU Zhujiang, WANG Qiang, YU Guangchun. Shale gas resource evaluation based on "pressure coefficient": a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 405-414. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003405

Citation:

PDF( 1056 KB)

Shale gas resource evaluation based on "pressure coefficient": a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003405

SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Received Date: 2020-02-13
Rev Recd Date: 2020-05-06
Publish Date: 2020-05-28

Abstract

Abstract

With the continuing shale gas exploration and development in China, it is necessary to establish a scientific method to evaluate shale gas resources. This paper focuses on considering the heterogeneity of shale gas resource distribution and the impact of preservation conditions. On the basis of identifying the main influencing factors of shale gas "pressure coefficient", the study area is divided into A-type area (pressure coefficient >1.2), B-type area (pressure coefficient 1.0-1.2) and C-type area (pressure coefficient 0.8-1.0). By dissecting the shale gas calibrated area of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Fuling, the resource volume is obtained as a key parameter for analog calculation, and the shale gas resources are evaluated by analogy. Comprehensive calculation of the total shale gas resources in the southeastern Sichuan area is 5.52×10¹² m³, 4.04×10¹² m³ of which is accounted for between 4 500-6 000 m depth, indicating that shale gas with a burial depth greater than 4 500 m in this area has a greater shale gas exploration potential.
- pressure coefficient,
- resource evaluation,
- shale gas,
- Wufeng-Longmaxi formations,
- Sichuan Basin

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	李建忠, 吴晓智, 郑民, 等. 常规与非常规油气资源评价的总体思路、方法体系与关键技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1557-1565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609002.htm LI Jianzhong, WU Xiaozhi, ZHENG Min, et al. General philosophy, method system and key technology of conventional and unconventional oil & gas resource assessment[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1557-1565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609002.htm
[2]	陈新军, 包书景, 侯读杰, 等. 页岩气资源评价方法与关键参数探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(5): 566-571. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201205008.htm CHEN Xinjun, BAO Shujing, HOU Dujie, et al. Methods and key parameters of shale gas resources evaluation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(5): 566-571. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201205008.htm
[3]	李浩涵, 陈科, 包书景, 等. 鄂西黄陵背斜南翼震旦系陡山沱组有利目标区页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 31-37. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901031 LI Haohan, CHEN Ke, BAO Shujing, et al. Evaluation of shale gas resources of the Sinian Doushantuo Formation in the southern Huangling anticline, western Hubei Province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 31-37. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901031
[4]	黄正清, 周道容, 李建青, 等. 下扬子地区寒武系页岩气成藏条件分析与资源潜力评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 94-98. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901094 HUANG Zhengqing, ZHOU Daorong, LI Jianqing, et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions and resource potential evaluation of the Cambrian in the Lower Yangtze area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 94-98. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901094
[5]	米石云, 郭秋麟, 胡素云, 等. 油气资源与目标一体化评价技术研究及系统集成[J]. 石油实验地质, 2009, 31(4): 420-426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2009.04.020 MI Shiyun, GUO Qiulin, HU Suyun, et al. A study on integrated evaluation of Petroleum resources with objects and its system integration[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009, 31(4): 420-426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2009.04.020
[6]	周庆凡. 世界页岩气和致密油技术可采资源量分布[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5): 830. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705021.htm ZHOU Qingfan. Distribution of technical recoverable resources of shale gas and tight oil in the world[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5): 830. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705021.htm
[7]	郭旭升. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. GUO Xusheng. Enrichment mechanism and exploration techno-logy at Jiaoshiba area, Fuligng Shale Gasfield[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
[8]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 魏志红, 等. 涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603003.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEI Zhihong, et al. Discovery and exploration of Fuling shale gas field[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(3): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603003.htm
[9]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 魏祥峰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩裂缝发育主控因素及对产能的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 799-808. GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEI Xiangfeng, et al. Main controlling factors on shale fractures and their influences on production capacity in Jiaoshiba area, the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6): 799-808.
[10]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 涪陵页岩气田富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4): 481-491. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201704002.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Geological factors controlling shale gas enrichment and high production in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4): 481-491. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201704002.htm
[11]	郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 刘成林, 等. 油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1305-1314. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201510014.htm GUO Qiulin, CHEN Ningsheng, LIU Chenglin, et al. Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(10): 1305-1314. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201510014.htm
[12]	陈元千, 齐亚东, 傅礼兵, 等. 井控页岩气可动地质储量和可采储量的评价方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018, 25(4): 73-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201804012.htm CHEN Yuanqian, QI Yadong, FU Libing, et al. Methods for estimating well-controlled movable in-place and recoverable reserves of shale gas[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018, 25(4): 73-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201804012.htm
[13]	罗文斌, 刘辰生. 湘中地区下古生界烟溪组页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(6): 697-702. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201906005.htm LUO Wenbin, LIU Chensheng. Evaluation of shale gas resources potential of Lower Paleozoic Yanxi Formation in central Hunan Province[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26(6): 697-702. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201906005.htm
[14]	李东晖, 聂海宽. 一种考虑气藏特征的页岩含气量计算方法: 以四川盆地及其周缘焦页1井和彭页1井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1324-1332. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906016.htm LI Donghui, NIE Haikuan. A new method to calculate shale gas content based on gas reservoir characterization: a case study of Wells JY1 and PY1 in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1324-1332. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906016.htm
[15]	陈花, 关富佳, 张杰, 等. 高压下页岩气吸附量计算新方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(2): 87-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201902012.htm CHEN Hua, GUAN Fujia, ZHANG Jie, et al. New method for calculating shale gas adsorption amount at high pressure[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(2): 87-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201902012.htm
[16]	吴晓智, 王社教, 郑民, 等. 常规与非常规油气资源评价技术规范体系建立及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1640-1650. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609010.htm WU Xiaozhi, WANG Shejiao, ZHENG Min, et al. Standard system establishment for conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources assessment techniques and its significance[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1640-1650. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609010.htm
[17]	郭秋麟, 周长迁, 陈宁生, 等. 非常规油气资源评价方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 12-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201104005.htm GUO Qiulin, ZHOU Changqian, CHEN Ningsheng, et al. Evaluation methods for unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Northwest Oil & Gas Exploration, 2011, 23(4): 12-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201104005.htm
[18]	王社教, 李峰, 郭秋麟, 等. 致密油资源评价方法及关键参数研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1576-1582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609004.htm WANG Shejiao, LI Feng, GUO Qiulin, et al. Tight oil resource assessment methods and key parameters[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1576-1582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609004.htm
[19]	罗兵, 郁飞, 陈亚琳, 等. 四川盆地涪陵地区页岩气层构造特征与保存评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(1): 103-109. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801103 LUO Bing, YU Fei, CHEN Yalin, et al. Structural features and preservation evaluation of shale gas reservoirs in the Fuling. area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(1): 103-109. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801103
[20]	何希鹏, 齐艳平, 何贵松, 等. 渝东南构造复杂区常压页岩气富集高产主控因素再认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(5): 32-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201905004.htm HE Xipeng, QI Yanping, HE Guisong, et al. Further understanding of main controlling factors of normal pressure shale gas enrichment and high yield in the area with complex structure of the southeast area of Chongqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 32-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201905004.htm
[21]	何顺, 秦启荣, 周吉羚, 等. 川东南DS地区龙马溪组页岩气形成及富集控制因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(6): 70-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201806013.htm HE Shun, QIN Qirong, ZHOU JiLing, et al. Shale gas generation and enrichment in the Longmaxi formation of DS, southeast Sichuang[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(6): 70-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201806013.htm
[22]	方志雄. 中国南方常压页岩气勘探开发面临的挑战及对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(5): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201905001.htm FANG Zhixiong. Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in southern China[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201905001.htm
[23]	刘鹏, 吴佩津, 彭钰洁. 焦石坝地区构造特征及页岩气保存模式研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(2): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201802007.htm LIU Peng, WU Peijin, PENG Yujie. Structure characterization and shale gas preservation pattern in Jiaoshiba[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(2): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201802007.htm
[24]	李登华, 李建忠, 汪少勇, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油刻度区精细解剖与关键参数研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1666-1678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609013.htm LI Denghua, LI Jianzhong, WANG Shaoyong, et al. Fine dissection of Jurassic tight oil calibrated area and key parameters research in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1666-1678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609013.htm
[25]	王玉满, 黄金亮, 王淑芳, 等. 四川盆地长宁、焦石坝志留系龙马溪组页岩气刻度区精细解剖[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 423-432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201603006.htm WANG Yuman, HUANG Jinliang, WANG Shufang, et al. Dissection of two calibrated areas of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Changning and Jiaoshiba, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(3): 423-432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201603006.htm
[26]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 文治东, 等. 四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 893-901. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403016.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEN Zhidong, et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery: a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formation of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3): 893-901. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403016.htm
[27]	魏祥峰, 李宇平, 魏志红, 等. 保存条件对四川盆地及周缘海相页岩气富集高产的影响机制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(2): 147-153. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702147 WEI Xiangfeng, LI Yuping, WEI Zhihong, et al. Effects of preservation conditions on enrichment and high yield of shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(2): 147-153. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702147

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(7) / Tables(3)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (929) PDF downloads(170)

Shale gas resource evaluation based on "pressure coefficient": a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003405

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Shale gas resource evaluation based on "pressure coefficient": a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003405

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content