Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

FU Qian; LIU Qidong; LIU Shili; DUAN Hongliang

doi:10.11781/sysydz202004625

Volume 42 Issue 4

Jul. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2020 > 42(4): 625-631

FU Qian, LIU Qidong, LIU Shili, DUAN Hongliang. Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 625-631. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625

Citation:

FU Qian, LIU Qidong, LIU Shili, DUAN Hongliang. Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 625-631. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625

Citation:

PDF( 3130 KB)

Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625

Research Institute of Exploration and Development, SINOPEC Jiangsu Oilfield, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 220009, China

Received Date: 2020-03-30
Rev Recd Date: 2020-06-09
Publish Date: 2020-07-28

Abstract

Abstract

"Carbonate sandwich shale oil" is a main exploration target in the Subei Basin. The deep depression-inner slope zone of the Gaoyou Sag is a favorable area for the exploration of "carbonate sandwich shale oil" in the second member of Funing Formation (E₁f₂). The source rock and reservoir quality, engineering conditions and movability of each shale section of E₁f₂ were analyzed in order to further clarify "sweet spot" sections by using scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion at elevated temperature, nitrogen adsorption, CT scanning, X-ray diffraction, triaxial mechanics, multi-temperature pyrolysis and other research methods. The E₁f₂^shale1 and E₁f₂^shale2 in the deep depression-inner slope zone of Gaoyou Sag were deposited in a dry, hot, reducing and brackish water environment, developing favorable shale with high organic matter content. The TOC contents are 2.33% and 1.63%, respectively Kerogens are mainly of types Ⅰ and Ⅱ₁, with the most favorable conditions for hydrocarbon generation. The interlamellar pores were well developed, and the reservoir space is dominated by macropores and fractures. The brittle mineral content of E₁f₂^shale1 to E₁f₂^shale5 is 59.1%-63.6%, and the clay minerals are dominated by illite/montmorillonite mixed layer and illite. The brittleness index of E₁f₂^shale2 is 64.25% at most. In the range of burial depth greater than 3 500 m, the conversion of the illite/montmorillonite mixed layer to illite is obvious, and the shale brittleness and fracturing transformation conditions are better. The E₁f₂^shale1 and E₁f₂^shale2 in the deep depression-inner slope zone of Gaoyou Sag are exploration directions for shale oil in the Subei Basin.
- carbonate rock interlayer,
- shale oil,
- reservoir-forming conditions,
- second member of Funing shale,
- Gaoyou Sag,
- Subei Basin

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	杨伟伟, 冯渊, 杨勇, 等. 页岩油藏的成藏条件及中国页岩油藏有利区展布[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(3): 253-257. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201503002.htm YANG Weiwei, FENG Yuan, YANG Yong, et al. Conditions of shale oil accumulation and distribution of favorable areas in China[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(3): 253-257. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201503002.htm
[2]	付亚荣. 中国页岩气发展现状及前景展望[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2013, 27(6): 19-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201306006.htm FU Yarong. Current development status and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2013, 27(6): 19-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201306006.htm
[3]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 浦秀刚, 等. 陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 361-372. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202205010.htm ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration in a lacustrine basin: a case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 361-372. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202205010.htm
[4]	贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701002.htm JIA Chengzao. Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory[J]. Petro-leum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701002.htm
[5]	邹才能, 翟光明, 张光亚, 等. 全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1): 13-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201501003.htm ZOU Caineng, ZHAI Guangming, ZHANG Guangya, et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1): 13-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201501003.htm
[6]	宁方兴. 济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 905-914. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201508002.htm NING Fangxing. The main control factors of shale oil enrichment in Jiyang Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 905-914. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201508002.htm
[7]	邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望: 以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htm ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Types, characte-ristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htm
[8]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 赵群. 论中国"能源独立"战略的内涵、挑战及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2): 416-426. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002023.htm ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, ZHAO Qun. On the connotation, challenge and significance of China's "energy independence" strategy[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 416-426. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002023.htm
[9]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2020.01.001 ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2020.01.001
[10]	张金川, 林腊梅, 李玉喜, 等. 页岩油分类与评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(5): 322-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201205032.htm ZHANG Jinchuan, LIN Lamei, LI Yuxi, et al. Classification and evaluation of shale oil[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(5): 322-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201205032.htm
[11]	付茜. 中国页岩油勘探开发现状、挑战及前景[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2015, 37(4): 58-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZC201901011.htm FU Qian. The status, challenge and prospect of shale oil exploration and development in China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2015, 37(4): 58-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZC201901011.htm
[12]	周庆凡, 杨国丰. 致密油与页岩油的概念与应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(4): 541-544. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201204009.htm ZHOU Qingfan, YANG Guofeng. Definition and application of tight oil and shale oil terms[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(4): 541-544. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201204009.htm
[13]	贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203000.htm JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203000.htm
[14]	POLLASTRO R M. Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 551-578.
[15]	柳波, 郭小波, 黄志龙, 等. 页岩油资源潜力预测方法探讨: 以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(4): 1472-1478. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201304027.htm LIU Bo, GUO Xiaobo, HUANG Zhilong, et al. Discussion on prediction method for hydrocarbon resource potential of shale oil: taking Lucaogou Formation shale oil of Malang Sag as case[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(4): 1472-1478. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201304027.htm
[16]	郑开富, 彭霞玲. 苏北盆地上白垩统-第三系页岩油气成藏层位及有利区带[J]. 地质学刊, 2013, 37(1): 147-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSDZ201301028.htm ZHENG Kaifu, PENG Xialing. Hydrocarbon accumulation and favorable zone of shale oil and gas in upper Cretaceous-Neogene of Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Geology, 2013, 37(1): 147-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSDZ201301028.htm
[17]	张廷山, 彭志, 祝海华, 等. 海安凹陷曲塘次凹阜二段页岩油形成条件及勘探潜力[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(2): 177-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201602035.htm ZHANG Tingshan, PENG Zhi, ZHU Haihua, et al. Forming conditions and exploration potential of shale oil from member 2 of Funing Formation in Qutang Subsag, Hai'an Sag[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(2): 177-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201602035.htm
[18]	王海方. 苏北盆地古近系页岩油储层有效裂缝识别[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(3): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201603003.htm WANG Haifang. Recognition of effective fractures within the oil shale in the fourth member of Funing Formation in Northern Jiangsu Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(3): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201603003.htm
[19]	王红伟, 段宏亮. 盐城凹陷阜二段页岩油形成条件及富集规律研究[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2016, 9(3): 14-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201603004.htm WANG Hongwei, DUAN Hongliang. Formation condition and enrichment rule of shale oil in the second member of Funing Formation in Yancheng Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2016, 9(3): 14-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201603004.htm
[20]	陈永昌, 张金川, 苏慧, 等. 东濮凹陷北部沙三段页岩油成藏地质条件分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014, 21(3): 62-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDKY201603001.htm CHEN Yongchang, ZHANG Jinchuan, SU Hui, et al. Analysis of geologic conditions for Es₃ shale oil accumulation in the northern Dongpu Sag[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoris, 2014, 21(3): 62-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDKY201603001.htm
[21]	李文浩, 卢双舫, 薛海涛, 等. 江汉盆地新沟嘴组页岩油储层物性发育主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 56-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201601009.htm LI Wenhao, LU Shuangfang, XUE Haitao, et al. Major controlling factors of poroperm characteristics of shale oil reservoirs in the Xingouzui Formation, Jianghan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1): 56-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201601009.htm
[22]	聂海宽, 张金川. 页岩气储层类型和特征研究: 以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2011, 33(3): 219-225. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201103219 NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Jinchuan. Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir: a case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2011, 33(3): 219-225. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201103219
[23]	付茜, 刘启东, 刘世丽, 等. 中国"夹层型"页岩油勘探开发现状及前景[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2019, 41(1): 63-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZC201901011.htm FU Qian, LIU Qidong, LIU Shili, et al. Exploration & development status and prospect of sandwich-type shale oil reservoirs in China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 41(1): 63-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZC201901011.htm
[24]	邱旭明, 刘玉瑞, 傅强. 苏北盆地上白垩统-第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006. QIU Xuming, LIU Yurui, FU Qiang. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Upper Cretaceous Tertiary in Subei Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006.
[25]	程海生, 刘世丽, 段宏亮. 苏北盆地阜宁组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2015, 8(3): 10-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201503003.htm CHENG Haisheng, LIU Shili, DUAN Hongliang. Shale reservoir characteristics of Funing Formation in Subei Basin[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2015, 8(3): 10-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201503003.htm
[26]	赵习, 刘波, 郭荣涛, 等. 储层表征技术及应用进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(2): 287-294. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702287 ZHAO Xi, LIU Bo, GUO Rongtao, et al. Reservoir characterization and its application to development[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(2): 287-294. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702287
[27]	俞雨溪, 罗晓容, 雷裕红, 等. 陆相页岩孔隙结构特征研究: 以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 716-726. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201604017.htm YU Yuxi, LUO Xiaorong, LEI Yuhong, et al. Characterization of lacustrine shale pore structure: an example from the Upper-Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(4): 716-726. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201604017.htm
[28]	格雷格S J, 辛K S W. 吸附、比表面与孔隙率[M]. 高敬宗, 译. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1989. GREG S J, SINGK S W. Adsorption, surface area and porosity[M]. GAO Jingzong, trans. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 1989.
[29]	李文镖, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等. 南方海相页岩物质组成与孔隙微观结构耦合关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 27-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201901003.htm LI Wenbiao, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al. The coupling relationship between material composition and pore microstructure of southern China marine shale[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(1): 27-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201901003.htm
[30]	刘平, 陈书平, 刘世丽, 等. 苏北盆地阜宁组泥页岩裂缝类型及形成期次[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(6): 13-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201406003.htm LIU Ping, CHEN Shuping, LIU Shili, et al. Types and forming epochs of the fractures in the shale of Funing Formation of Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 29(6): 13-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201406003.htm
[31]	唐颖, 邢云, 李乐忠, 等. 页岩储层可压裂性影响因素及评价方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(5): 356-363. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201205036.htm TANG Ying, XING Yun, LI Lezhong, et al. Influence factors and evaluation methods of the gas shale fracability[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(5): 356-363. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201205036.htm
[32]	彭金宁, 邱岐, 王东燕, 等. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组致密油赋存状态与可动用性[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 53-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001053 PENG Jinning, QIU Qi, WANG Dongyan, et al. Occurrence and recoverability of tight oil in Paleogene Funing Formation, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(1): 53-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001053
[33]	王秀宁, 巨明霜, 杨文胜, 等. 致密油藏动态渗吸排驱规律与机理[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(3): 92-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201903012.htm WANG Xiuyu, JU Mingshuang, YANG Wensheng, et al. Dynamic imbibition principles and mechanism of tight oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(3): 92-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201903012.htm

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(4) / Tables(1)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (1007) PDF downloads(166)

Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content