Temperature-sensitivity of underground gas reservoir storage and its effect on well deliverability

ZHENG Shaojing; ZHENG Dewen; SUN Junchang; LI Chun; WU Zhide; ZHU Sinan; LIU Xianshan

doi:10.11781/sysydz202202365

Volume 44 Issue 2

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2022 > 44(2): 365-372

ZHENG Shaojing, ZHENG Dewen, SUN Junchang, LI Chun, WU Zhide, ZHU Sinan, LIU Xianshan. Temperature-sensitivity of underground gas reservoir storage and its effect on well deliverability[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(2): 365-372. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202365

Citation:

ZHENG Shaojing, ZHENG Dewen, SUN Junchang, LI Chun, WU Zhide, ZHU Sinan, LIU Xianshan. Temperature-sensitivity of underground gas reservoir storage and its effect on well deliverability[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(2): 365-372. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202365

Citation:

ZHENG Shaojing, ZHENG Dewen, SUN Junchang, LI Chun, WU Zhide, ZHU Sinan, LIU Xianshan. Temperature-sensitivity of underground gas reservoir storage and its effect on well deliverability[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(2): 365-372. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202365

PDF( 1635 KB)

Temperature-sensitivity of underground gas reservoir storage and its effect on well deliverability

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202365

ZHENG Shaojing^{1, 2
,},
ZHENG Dewen^{1, 2},
SUN Junchang^{1, 2
,
,},
LI Chun^{1, 2},
WU Zhide^{1, 2},
ZHU Sinan^{1, 2},
LIU Xianshan^{1, 2}

1.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Underground Storage, PetroChina, Langfang, Hebei 065007, China

Received Date: 2021-09-07
Rev Recd Date: 2022-01-17
Publish Date: 2022-03-28

Abstract

Abstract

The temperature change under alternating injection-production conditions of underground gas reservoir storage is a key factor for permeability and even deliverability. To explore the temperature-sensitivity of sandstone reservoir permeability and its effect on the deliverability of gas well, experimental studies at multiple rounds were carried out within the realistic temperature range of underground gas storage to simulate more accurately. Results show that: (1) Reservoir permeability negatively correlates with temperature. Permeability exhibits a hysteresis effect under cyclic alternating temperature, and the hysteresis effect gradually weakens with the variation of temperature. (2) Permeability and temperature are linearly correlated, and the hysteresis effect does not change with temperature, which is different from stress-sensitivity. (3) Based on the experimental results, a deliverability equation modified with temperature-sensitivity was established. Calculation shows that, ignoring the temperature-sensitivity of permeability will underestimate the performance of gas well, and its effect will aggravate with the increasing elevation and injection flowrate.
- gas reservoir storage,
- temperature-sensitivity,
- hysteresis effect,
- injection-production performance,
- deliverability equation

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	邹才能, 赵群, 陈建军, 等. 中国天然气发展态势及战略预判[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(4): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804002.htm ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CHEN Jianjun, et al. Natural gas in China: development trend and strategic forecast[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(4): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804002.htm
[2]	丁国生, 李春, 王皆明, 等. 中国地下储气库现状及技术发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(11): 107-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201511026.htm DING Guosheng, LI Chun, WANG Jieming, et al. The status quo and technical development direction of underground gas storages in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(11): 107-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201511026.htm
[3]	马新华, 郑得文, 申瑞臣, 等. 中国复杂地质条件气藏型储气库建库关键技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 489-499. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201803016.htm MA Xinhua, ZHENG Dewen, SHEN Ruichen, et al. Key technologies and practice for gas field storage facility construction of complex geological conditions in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 489-499. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201803016.htm
[4]	孙军昌, 胥洪成, 王皆明, 等. 气藏型地下储气库建库注采机理与评价关键技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(4): 138-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804023.htm SUN Junchang, XU Hongcheng, WANG Jieming, et al. Injection-production mechanisms and key evaluation technologies for underground gas storages rebuilt from gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(4): 138-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804023.htm
[5]	郑得文, 胥洪成, 王皆明, 等. 气藏型储气库建库评价关键技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(5): 794-801. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201705017.htm ZHENG Dewen, XU Hongcheng, WANG Jieming, et al. Key evaluation techniques in the process of gas reservoir being converted into underground gas storage[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5): 794-801. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201705017.htm
[6]	孙春柳, 侯吉瑞, 石磊, 等. 气藏型储气库注采运行物理模拟研究与应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(5): 58-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201605014.htm SUN Chunliu, HOU Jirui, SHI Lei, et al. A physical simulation experimental system for injection-withdrawal operation of gas reservoir underground gas storage and its application[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(5): 58-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201605014.htm
[7]	SOMERTON W H, GUPTA V S. Role of fluxing agents in thermal alteration of sandstones[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1965, 17(5): 585-588.
[8]	卜宜顺, 杨圣奇, 黄彦华. 温度和损伤程度对砂岩渗透特性影响的试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(5): 122-130. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX202105011.htm BU Yishun, YANG Shengqi, HUANG Yanhua. Experimental study on the influence of temperature and damage degree on the permeability of sandstone[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(5): 122-130. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX202105011.htm
[9]	左建平, 谢和平, 周宏伟, 等. 不同温度作用下砂岩热开裂的实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2007, 50(4): 1150-1155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200704023.htm ZUO Jianping, XIE Heping, ZHOU Hongwei, et al. Experimental research on thermal cracking of sandstone under different temperature[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2007, 50(4): 1150-1155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200704023.htm
[10]	郭肖, 朱争, 高涛, 等. 温度对低渗透储层应力敏感影响[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015, 34(4): 82-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK201504016.htm GUO Xiao, ZHU Zheng, GAO Tao, et al. Influences of the temperature on the stress-sensitivity in low-permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015, 34(4): 82-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK201504016.htm
[11]	SANYAL S K, MARSDEN S S JR, RAMEY H J JR. Effect of temperature on petrophysical properties of reservoir rocks[C]//SPE California Regional Meeting. San Francisco, California: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1974.
[12]	刘均荣, 秦积舜, 吴晓东. 温度对岩石渗透率影响的实验研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(4): 51-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200104015.htm LIU Junrong, QIN Jishun, WU Xiaodong. Experimental study on relation between temperature and rocky permeability[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 2001, 25(4): 51-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200104015.htm
[13]	曾平, 赵金洲, 李治平, 等. 温度、有效应力和含水饱和度对低渗透砂岩渗透率影响的实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 31-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200501007.htm ZENG Ping, ZHAO Jinzhou, LI Zhiping, et al. Experimental study concerning the effect of temperature, effective stress and water saturation on the permeability of tight sandstone[J]. Nature Gas Geoscience, 2005, 16(1): 31-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200501007.htm
[14]	梁冰, 高红梅, 兰永伟. 岩石渗透率与温度关系的理论分析和试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(12): 2009-2012. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200512001.htm LIANG Bing, GAO Hongmei, LAN Yongwei. Theoretical analysis and experimental study on relation between rock permeability and temperature[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(12): 2009-2012. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200512001.htm
[15]	刘向君, 高涵, 梁利喜. 温度围压对低渗透砂岩孔隙度和渗透率的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(S2): 3771-3778. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2011S2053.htm LIU Xiangjun, GAO Han, LIANG Lixi. Study of temperature and confining pressure effects on porosity and permeability in low permeability sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S2): 3771-3778. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2011S2053.htm
[16]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 岩心分析方法: GB/T 29172-2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Practices for core analysis: GB/T 29172-2012[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2013.
[17]	李继强, 赵冠群, 戚志林, 等. 气藏型储气库多周期注采储集层应力敏感效应[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4): 835-842. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104018.htm LI Jiqiang, ZHAO Guanqun, QI Zhilin, et al. Stress sensitivity of formation during multi-cycle gas injection and production in an underground gas storage rebuilt from gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4): 835-842. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104018.htm
[18]	苟燕, 孙军昌, 杨正明, 等. 复杂岩性储层渗透率—应力敏感性及其对气井产能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(9): 2535-2542. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201409015.htm GOU Yan, SUN Junchang, YANG Zhengming, et al. Permeability-stress sensitivity of complex lithology reservoir and its effect on gas well productivity[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(9): 2535-2542. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201409015.htm
[19]	朱华银, 唐立根, 庞宇来, 等. 裂缝—孔隙型储层在交变压力条件下的渗透率变化: 以四川盆地东部沙坪场石炭系气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 914-922. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202106014.htm ZHU Huayin, TANG Ligen, PANG Yulai, et al. Permeability changes of fracture-pore type reservoir under the conditions of alternating pressure: case study of Shapingchang carbonate gas reservoir in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(6): 914-922. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202106014.htm
[20]	弗杰尔E, 霍尔特R M, 霍斯拉德P, 等. 石油工程岩石力学[M]. 邓金根, 蔚宝华, 王金凤, 译. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2012. FJAER E, HOLT R M, HORSRUD P. Petroleum related rock mechanics[M]. DENG Jingen, WEI Baohua, WANG Jinfeng, trans. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2012.
[21]	李传亮. 油藏工程原理[M]. 2版. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011. LI Chuanliang. Fundamentals of reservoir engineering[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.
[22]	NI H Y, LIU J F, CHEN X, et al. Macroscopic and microscopic study on gas permeability characteristics of tight sandstone under temperature-stress coupling[R]. The 5th ISRM Young Scholars' Symposium on Rock Mechanics and International Symposium on Rock Engineering for Innovative Future, Okinawa, Japan, 2019.
[23]	孙珂, 陈清华. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷阜宁组砂岩储层力学性质及影响因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 343-353. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102343 SUN Ke, CHEN Qinghua. Mechanical properties and influencing factors of Funing Formation sandstone reservoir in Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 343-353. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102343
[24]	张璐, 国建英, 林潼, 等. 碳酸盐岩盖层突破压力的影响因素分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 461-467. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103461 ZHANG Lu, GUO Jianying, LIN Tong, et al. Influencing factors for breakthrough pressure of carbonate caprocks[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 461-467. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103461
[25]	王泉, 陈超, 李道清, 等. 基于有效渗透率的单井增产潜力定量评价: 以新疆H储气库为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(4): 450-456. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202004010.htm WANG Quan, CHEN Chao, LI Daoqing, et al. Quantitative evaluation of well yield-increasing potential based on effective permeability: a case of H gas storage in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(4): 450-456. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202004010.htm
[26]	李士伦. 天然气工程[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2000. LI Shilun. Gas engineering[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2000.
[27]	于洋, 李力民, 董宗豪, 等. 相国寺储气库注采井井筒温度压力预测[J]. 石油管材与仪器, 2019, 5(2): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYQ201902008.htm YU Yang, LI Limin, DONG Zonghao, et al. Prediction for wellbore temperature and pressure in injection-production well of the Xiangguosi gas storage[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments, 2019, 5(2): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYQ201902008.htm

Relative Articles

[1]	HAN Xueting, MENG Shangzhi, LIU Guangjing, REN Zhenyu, TAO Shu, MEN Xinyang, WEI Ziyang. Impact of new coalbed methane wells on old well productivity and its controlling factors: a case study of Shizhuangnan block in Qinshui Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2025, 47(1): 195-203. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025010195
[2]	FENG Yongtai, ZHAO Linjie, WANG Baohua, LI Longlong, DUAN Tiejun. Application and discussion of multi-factor sensitivity analysis in value assessment of areas with low exploration level[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2025, 47(2): 426-432. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025020426
[3]	LU Zhendong, LIU Chenglin, ZENG Xiaoxiang, YANG Hong, ZANG Qibiao, WU Yuping, LI Guoxiong, FENG Dehao. Shale oil size distribution models and their sensitivities[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(4): 730-738. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204730
[4]	GAO Yuqiao, GUO Tao, HE Xipeng, GAO Xiaokang. Optimization of multi-layer commingled coalbed methane production in Zhijin area, Guizhou province[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(2): 227-232. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102227
[5]	GAO Yuqiao, GAO Hequn, HE Xipeng, DING Anxu, ZHANG Peixian, HE Guisong. Methane isotope fractionation characteristics of shale gas and its significance as a productivity indicator[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(6): 865-870. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201906865
[6]	MEI Dan, HU Yong, WANG Qian. Experimental study on fracture contribution to gas reservoir permeability and well capacity[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(5): 769-772. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201905769
[7]	WANG Jinghui, MEI Minghua, LIANG Zhengzhong, WANG Huajun. Controls and quantitative characterization of stress sensitivity for coal seams[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(6): 859-863. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806859
[8]	Liu Hongyu, Chen Wei, Wu Feng. Dynamic models and equations of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in graben basins:A case study of the Maichen Sag, Beibuwan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(6): 738-746. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706738
[9]	Li Zongrui, Hao Yang. Pilot test for gas production of fractured-vuggy condensate gas reservoir by water injection in Tahe oil field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(S1): 44-47. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2016S1044
[10]	Zhang Ai, Huang Jie, He Lei. Optimization of cyclic gas injection parameters in Dalaoba Condensate Gas Reservoir[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(s1): 85-88. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2014S1085
[11]	Lü Ping, Huang Huang, Liu Chunyun, Yao Tianwan, Xiao Hong. Prediction and precaution of cyclic gas injection problem in Dalaoba Gas Condensate Reservoir[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(S1): 24-027. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2013S1024
[12]	Zhang Ai, Zhao Xisen, Zhang Yun, Xu Shisheng, Xu Lina. Phase mechanism of gas injection in Dalaoba Gas Condensate Field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2011, 33(S1): 69-73. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2011S1069
[13]	Pan Weiyi, Lun Zengmin, Wang Weihong, Liu Hua. Experimental study of stress sensitivity in abnormal overpressure gas reservoir[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2011, 33(2): 212-214. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201102212
[14]	Tan Shihai, Wei Jianwei. PRESSURE SENSITIVITY STUDY OF HIGH-PRESSURE AND LOW-PERMEABILITY CARBONATE RESERVOIR IN T OILFIELD, THE NORTH JIANGJU BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2006, 28(1): 91-94. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200601091
[15]	Wang Yuewen, Lu Shuangfang, Fang Wei, Zhang Juhe, Huang Xiuping. A STUDY AND APPLICATION TO ARITHMETIC OF PRODUCTION ALLOCATION OF MULTILAYER COMMINGLED PRODUCTION[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2005, 27(6): 630-634. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200506630
[16]	Gao Boyu, Zhou Yongyi, Peng Shimi. STUDY ON THE STRESS SENSIBILITY OF RESERVOIR POROSITY[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2005, 27(2): 197-202. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200502197
[17]	CHANG Xue-jun, YIN Zhi-jun. SENSITIVITY EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND ITS MECHANISM ANALYSIS OF RESERVOIRS IN THE THIRD MEMBER of THE SHAHEJIE FORMATION, GAOSHANGPU OILFIELD[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2004, 26(1): 84-88. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200401084
[18]	ZHOU De-hua, GE Jia-li. PRODUCIBILITY EQUATIONS OF HORIZONTAL WELLS IN AREAL WELL SPACING SET UP BY THE EQUIVALENT FLOWING RESISTANCE METHOD[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2004, 26(6): 594-596. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200406594
[19]	XIANG Yang, XIANG Dan, HUANG Da-zhi. STUDY ON THE STRESS SENSITIVITY OF PERMEABILITY IN FRACTURE-PORE DUAL MEDIA BY THE FULL SIMULATION EXPERIMENT[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2003, 25(5): 498-500. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200305498
[20]	TAO Shi-zhen, QIN Sheng-fei. FLUID INCLUSIONS AND PHASES OF PETROLEUM INFILLING AND MIGRATION IN KELA-2 GAS POOL, TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2002, 24(5): 437-440. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200205437

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	魏海峰. 深层盐穴储气库排卤管柱盐结晶实验及现场应用. 断块油气田. 2024(03): 541-546 .
2.	丁洋洋，秦正山，何勇明，刘文龙，向祖平，程泽华. 枯竭油藏型储气库库容量化室内实验研究. 非常规油气. 2024(04): 89-96 .
3.	柴小颖，王燕，刘俊丰，陈汾君，杨会洁，谈志伟. 柴达木盆地涩北气田疏松砂岩气藏水气体积比及水侵预警. 新疆石油地质. 2023(01): 51-57 .
4.	司宝，闫茜，刘强，张彦斌，付春苗，齐桓. 油藏型储气库与天然气驱油协同建设实验——以葡北油田三间房组油藏为例. 新疆石油地质. 2023(03): 321-326 .
5.	刘青峰. 油气藏型储气库产能计算新方法. 油气地质与采收率. 2023(03): 159-166 .
6.	彭井宏，周军，胡承强，黄薪宇，梁光川. 热力耦合作用下地下盐岩储气库注采运行稳定性研究. 断块油气田. 2023(05): 858-867 .
7.	范宇，高新平，宁飞，彭钧亮，李力民，彭欢，陈明君. 基于多周期注采的气藏型地下储气库储层渗流规律. 天然气工业. 2023(10): 103-111 .
8.	何海燕，刘先山，耿少阳，孙军昌，孙彦春，贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟. 油气藏评价与开发. 2023(06): 819-826 .

Other cited types(4)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(8) / Tables(4)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (633) PDF downloads(57)