Volume 45 Issue 5
Sep.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Xuhui, ZHOU Zhuoming, SONG Zhenxiang, YANG Guoqiao. Methods and key parameters for oil and gas resource assessment and distribution characteristics of oil and gas resource: a case study of resource assessment of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(5): 832-843. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305832
Citation: XU Xuhui, ZHOU Zhuoming, SONG Zhenxiang, YANG Guoqiao. Methods and key parameters for oil and gas resource assessment and distribution characteristics of oil and gas resource: a case study of resource assessment of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(5): 832-843. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305832

Methods and key parameters for oil and gas resource assessment and distribution characteristics of oil and gas resource: a case study of resource assessment of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305832
  • Received Date: 2023-07-19
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-08-02
  • Publish Date: 2023-09-28
  • Based on the research and optimization of oil and gas resource assessment methods, a comprehensive oil and gas resource assessment method process and technical system, which integrated assessment of conventional and unconventional resources as well as assessment of geological, economic and ecological aspects, were established for SINOPEC-controlled exploration areas during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. The study focused on the key parameters for resource assessment, including a complete hydrocarbon generation-expulsion-retention evolution model and productivity model applicable to different types of source rocks in different basins/regions in China based on TSM basin simulation technology, and a key parameter acquisition method and assessment indicators for resource assessment based on typical calibrated unit dissection. Through systematic assessment of all oil and gas bearing layers (from Sinian system to Quaternary system) of nearly 50 basins/regions in SINOPEC-controlled exploration areas, the geological resources of seven different types of oil and gas, including conventional oil and gas, tight oil and gas, shale oil and gas, and coalbed methane were assessed, which clarified the economical recoverability and environmental impact of oil and gas resources. By studying the resource distribution characteristics, the future exploration areas and directions were further clarified. It is indicated that the deep-ultra deep layers are the main focus for conventional oil and gas exploration, while unconventional resources, especially shale oil and gas, are important areas for increasing oil and gas reserves and production in the future. The sea exploration area also has broad exploration prospects. At the same time, the results of resource assessment provide important basis for the planning and exploration deployment of oil companies during the 14th Five-Year Plan period.

     

  • All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.
    The study was designed by XU Xuhui and ZHOU Zhuoming. The paper structure was constructed by XU Xuhui, ZHOU Zhuoming and SONG Zhenxiang. The manuscript was drafted and revised by XU Xuhui, ZHOU Zhuoming, SONG Zhenxiang and YANG Guoqiao. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.
  • loading
  • [1]
    宋振响, 周卓明, 徐旭辉, 等. "十三五"中国石化油气资源评价关键技术进展与发展方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(3): 27-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202203003.htm

    SONG Zhenxiang, ZHOU Zhuoming, XU Xuhui, et al. Progress of key technologies for oil and gas resource assessment of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and development direction[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 27-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202203003.htm
    [2]
    李建忠, 吴晓智, 郑民, 等. 常规与非常规油气资源评价的总体思路、方法体系与关键技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1557-1565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609002.htm

    LI Jianzhong, WU Xiaozhi, ZHENG Min, et al. General philosophy, method system and key technology of conventional and unconventional oil & gas resource assessment[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1557-1565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609002.htm
    [3]
    宋振响, 陆建林, 周卓明, 等. 常规油气资源评价方法研究进展与发展方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(3): 21-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.03.003

    SONG Zhenxiang, LU Jianlin, ZHOU Zhuoming, et al. Research progress and future development of assessment methods for conventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(3): 21-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.03.003
    [4]
    邹才能, 杨智, 张国生, 等. 常规—非常规油气"有序聚集"理论认识及实践意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1): 14-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201401002.htm

    ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, ZHANG Guosheng, et al. Conventional and unconventional petroleum "orderly accumulation": concept and practical significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1): 14-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201401002.htm
    [5]
    郭秋麟, 周长迁, 陈宁生, 等. 非常规油气资源评价方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 12-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2011.04.003

    GUO Qiulin, ZHOU Changqian, CHEN Ningsheng, et al. Evalua-tion methods for unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(4): 12-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2011.04.003
    [6]
    宋振响, 徐旭辉, 王保华, 等. 页岩气资源评价方法研究进展与发展方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1038-1047. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005015.htm

    SONG Zhenxiang, Xu Xuhui, Wang Baohua, et al. Advances in shale gas resource assessment methods and their future evolvement[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(5): 1038-1047. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005015.htm
    [7]
    徐旭辉. TSM盆地模拟资源评价理论方法与应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2020: 5-32.

    XU Xuhui. Theory, methods and application of TSM basin simulation and resource assessment[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2020: 5-32.
    [8]
    盛秀杰, 金之钧, 肖晔. 区带勘探中的油气资源评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5): 983-992. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705017.htm

    SHENG Xiujie, JIN Zhijun, XIAO Ye, et al. Petroleum resources assessment methodology in play exploration stages[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5): 983-992. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201705017.htm
    [9]
    杨智, 邹才能, 陈建军, 等. "进(近)源找油": 油气地质理论创新与重点领域勘探思考[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1310-1324. doi: 10.7623/syxb202110005

    YANG Zhi, ZOU Caineng, CHEN Jianjun, et al. "Exploring petroleum inside or near the source kitchen": innovations in petroleum geology theory and reflections on hydrocarbon exploration in key fields[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 1310-1324. doi: 10.7623/syxb202110005
    [10]
    贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701002.htm

    JIA Chengzao. Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701002.htm
    [11]
    马中良, 郑伦举, 李志明. 烃源岩有限空间温压共控生排烃模拟实验研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(5): 955-963. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201205021.htm

    MA Zhongliang, ZHEN Lunju, LI Zhiming. The thermocompre-ssion simulation experiment of source rock hydrocarbon generation and expulsion in formation porosity[J]. Acta Sedimentolo-gica Sinica, 2012, 30(5): 955-963. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201205021.htm
    [12]
    徐旭辉, 朱建辉, 江兴歌, 等. TSM盆地模拟原理方法与应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(6): 729-737. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706729

    XU Xuhui, ZHU Jianhui, JIANG Xingge, et al. Principle of TSM basin simulation system and its application[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy and Experiment, 2017, 39(6): 729-737. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706729
    [13]
    郭旭升, 郭彤楼, 黄仁春, 等. 中国海相油气田勘探实例之十六: 四川盆地元坝大气田的发现与勘探[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19(4): 57-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201404010.htm

    GUO Xusheng, GUO Tonglou, HUANG Renchun, et al. Cases of discovery and exploration of marine fields in China(Part 16): Yuanba gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19(4): 57-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201404010.htm
    [14]
    郭彤楼. 元坝气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(6): 748-760. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202201011.htm

    GUO Tonglou. Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies in Yuanba gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(6): 748-760. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202201011.htm
    [15]
    周波, 金之钧, 云金表, 等. 碳酸盐岩油气二次运移距离与成藏[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 457-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201604002.htm

    ZHOU Bo, JIN Zhijun, YUN Jinbiao, et al. Secondary oil migration distance and hydrocarbon accumulation in carbonate rocks[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(4): 457-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201604002.htm
    [16]
    郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 四川盆地元坝气田发现与理论技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201801003.htm

    GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Discovery and theoretical and technical innovations of Yuanba gas field in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Develop-ment, 2018, 45(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201801003.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (798) PDF downloads(128) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return