JI Rang-shou, GAO Chang-lin, QIN De-yu. MATCHING MODE OF NORTH CHINA AND YANGTZE PLATES AND STRAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PALEOZOIC BASIN IN THE NORTH EDGE OF THE YANGTZE PLATE[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2004, 26(2): 143-152. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200402143
Citation: XIONG Liang, DENG Hucheng, WU Dong, WEI Limin, WANG Tong, ZHOU Hua, CAO Kaixuan, XIE Xinhui, MA Ruolong, ZHONG Yutao. Fine-grained sedimentary characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(5): 857-871. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305857

Fine-grained sedimentary characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305857
  • Received Date: 2023-07-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-08-21
  • Publish Date: 2023-09-28
  • The Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery is rich in shale gas resources, and it has become one of the important shale gas development intervals in Sichuan Basin. Controlled by complex sedimentary setting, the silty shale reservoir in Qiongzhusi Formation has various lithofacies and strong heterogeneity longitudinally, which restricts the exploration and development of shale gas. Therefore, it is urgent to study the sedimentary characteristics, sedimentary facies and sedimentary models. Based on the previous understanding of tectonic setting and sequence stratigraphy, and through detailed analysis of rock data, well logging data, geochemistry data and paleontology data, this paper clarifies the Early Cambrian sedimentary background of combined ocean-paleoland influence, moderate water depth and widespread reduction of Sichuan Basin and its periphery. The paper also believes that the Qiongzhusi Formation is mainly deposited in shore facies and continental shelf facies. The continental shelf facies are dominated, including shallow water continental shelf subfacies and deep water continental shelf subfacies. Based on the analysis of the combined action of wave and tide, seawater evaporation, suspension, rising ocean current, sedimentary paleogeomorphology and other fine-grained sedimentary influencing factors, and combined with the spatial distribution characteristics of sediments, the fine-grained sedimentary model of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery is established, i.e., in the early stage of sedimentation, the effect of differential sedimentation is significant, the sequence thickness varies greatly, and the sedimentary characteristics and influencing factors differ greatly in different regions. In the middle stage of sedimentation, the effect of differential sedimentation is diminished and the difference of sequence thickness decreases continuously. In the late stage of sedimentation, with steady sedimentation, it enters the "open basin" stage, and the sequence thickness tends to be consistent.

     

  • All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.
    The study was designed and examined by XIONG Liang and DENG Hucheng. The manuscript was drafted and revised by WU Dong, WEI Limin and WANG Tong. The experiments were designed by ZHOU Hua, CAO Kaixuan and XIE Xinhui. The experimental operation was completed by MA Ruolong and ZHONG Yutao. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.
  • [1]
    姜在兴, 梁超, 吴靖, 等. 含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(6): 1031-1039. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201306001.htm

    JIANG Zaixing, LIANG Chao, WU Jing, et al. Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6): 1031-1039. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201306001.htm
    [2]
    刘可禹, 刘畅. "化学—沉积相"分析: 一种研究细粒沉积岩的有效方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 491-503. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903006.htm

    LIU Keyu, LIU Chang. "Chemo-sedimentary facies" analysis: an effective method to study fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 491-503. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903006.htm
    [3]
    胡素云, 白斌, 陶士振, 等. 中国陆相中高成熟度页岩油非均质地质条件与差异富集特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(2): 224-237. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202202020.htm

    HU Suyun, BAI Bin, TAO Shizhen, et al. Heterogeneous geolo-gical conditions and differential enrichment of medium and high maturity continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(2): 224-237. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202202020.htm
    [4]
    郭彤楼, 熊亮, 叶素娟, 等. 输导层(体)非常规天然气勘探理论与实践: 四川盆地新类型页岩气与致密砂岩气突破的启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(1): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202301003.htm

    GUO Tonglou, XIONG Liang, YE Sujuan, et al. Theory and practice of unconventional gas exploration in carrier beds: insight from the breakthrough of new type of shale gas and tight gas in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(1): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202301003.htm
    [5]
    何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 等. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题: 以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202004003.htm

    HE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, HU Dongfeng, et al. Geological problems in the effective development of deep shale gas: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 379-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202004003.htm
    [6]
    张金川, 史淼, 王东升, 等. 中国页岩气勘探领域和发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 69-80. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.08.007

    ZHANG Jinchuan, SHI Miao, WANG Dongsheng, et al. Fields and directions for shale gas exploration in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 69-80. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.08.007
    [7]
    黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 金之钧, 等. 中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1): 1-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202201020.htm

    LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIN Zhijun, et al. Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 1-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202201020.htm
    [8]
    刘忠宝, 高波, 张钰莹, 等. 上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 21-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701004.htm

    LIU Zhongbao, GAO Bo, ZHANG Yuying, et al. Types and distribution of the shale sedimentary facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze area, South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 21-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701004.htm
    [9]
    赵建华, 金之钧, 林畅松, 等. 上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 701-715. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201904003.htm

    ZHAO Jianhua, JIN Zhijun, LIN Changsong, et al. Sedimentary environment of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale in the Upper Yangtze region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 701-715. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201904003.htm
    [10]
    朱筱敏. 沉积岩石学[M]. 5版. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2020.

    ZHU Xiaomin. Sedimentary petrology[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2020.
    [11]
    王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 等. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101007.htm

    WANG Hongyan, SHI Zhensheng, SUN Shasha, et al. Characte-rization and genesis of deep shale reservoirs in the first member of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 66-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101007.htm
    [12]
    王同, 熊亮, 董晓霞, 等. 川南地区筇竹寺组新层系页岩储层特征[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 443-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103021.htm

    WANG Tong, XIONG Liang, DONG Xiaoxia, et al. Characteristics of shale reservoir in new strata of Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 443-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103021.htm
    [13]
    吴冬, 邓虎成, 熊亮, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统麦地坪组—筇竹寺组层序充填和演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 764-777. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202303018.htm

    WU Dong, DENG Hucheng, XIONG Liang, et al. Sequence filling and evolutionary model of the Lower Cambrian Maidiping-Qiongzhusi formations in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 764-777. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202303018.htm
    [14]
    范海经, 邓虎成, 伏美燕, 等. 四川盆地下寒武统筇竹寺组沉积特征及其对构造的响应[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(4): 1004-1019. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202104018.htm

    FAN Haijing, DENG Hucheng, FU Meiyan, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its response to construction[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(4): 1004-1019. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202104018.htm
    [15]
    刘忠宝, 王鹏威, 聂海宽, 等. 中上扬子地区寒武系页岩气富集条件及有利区优选[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(9): 3694-3707. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD202209031.htm

    LIU Zhongbao, WANG Pengwei, NIE Haikuan, et al. Enrichment conditions and favorable prospecting targets of Cambrian shale gas in Middle-Upper Yangtze[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53(9): 3694-3707. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD202209031.htm
    [16]
    刘树根, 孙玮, 宋金民, 等. 四川盆地海相油气分布的构造控制理论[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(3): 146-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201503015.htm

    LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, SONG Jinmin, et al. Tectonics-controlled distribution of marine petroleum accumulations in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(3): 146-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201503015.htm
    [17]
    高祺瑞, 赵政璋. 中国油气新区勘探(第五卷): 中国南方海相油气地质及勘探前景[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001.

    GAO Qirui, ZHAO Zhengzhang. The frontier petroleum exploration in China (Volume 5)[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001.
    [18]
    WANG Jian, LI Zhengxiang. History of Neoproterozoic rift basins in South China: implications for Rodinia break-up[J]. Precambrian Research, 2003, 122(1/4): 141-158.
    [19]
    李献华, 李武显, 何斌. 华南陆块的形成与Rodinia超大陆聚合—裂解: 观察、解释与检验[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2012, 31(6): 543-559. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201206001.htm

    LI Xianhua, LI Wuxian, HE Bin. Building of the South China block and its relevance to assembly and breakup of Rodinia supercontinent: observations, interpretations and tests[J]. Bulletin of Minera-logy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012, 31(6): 543-559. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201206001.htm
    [20]
    刘树根, 孙玮, 罗志立, 等. 兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(5): 511-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201305003.htm

    LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, LUO Zhili, et al. Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian Strata in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(5): 511-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201305003.htm
    [21]
    梁霄, 马韶光, 李郭琴, 等. 上斜坡区筇竹寺组沉积环境及其页岩气勘探潜力: 以四川盆地威远地区威207井为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(5): 68-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202205009.htm

    LIANG Xiao, MA Shaoguang, LI Guoqin, et al. Sedimentary environment and shale gas exploration potential of Qiongzhusi Formation in the upslope area: a case study on well W-207, Weiyuan area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 68-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202205009.htm
    [22]
    牟传龙, 梁薇, 周恳恳, 等. 中上扬子地区早寒武世(纽芬兰世—第二世)岩相古地理[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2012, 32(3): 41-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD201203003.htm

    MOU Chuanlong, LIANG Wei, ZHOU Kenken, et al. Sedimentary facies and palaeogeography of the middle-upper Yangtze area during the Early Cambrian (Terreneuvian-Series 2)[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2012, 32(3): 41-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD201203003.htm
    [23]
    刘树根, 王一刚, 孙玮, 等. 拉张槽对四川盆地海相油气分布的控制作用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(1): 1-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201601001.htm

    LIU Shugen, WANG Yigang, SUN Wei, et al. Control of intracratonic sags on the hydrocarbon accumulations in the marine strata across the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(1): 1-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201601001.htm
    [24]
    DILL H. Metallogenesis of Early Paleozoic graptolite shales from the Graefenthal Horst (Northern Bavaria-Federal Republic of Germany)[J]. Economic Geology, 1986, 81(4): 889-903.
    [25]
    伏美燕, 李娜, 黄茜, 等. 滨岸—浅海混合沉积对海平面与气候变化的响应: 以塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(6): 1110-1120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201706003.htm

    FU Meiyan, LI Na, HUANG Qian, et al. Shoreline-neritic mixed sedimentation response to sea level change and paleoclimate: a case study from Carboniferous in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedi-mentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(6): 1110-1120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201706003.htm
    [26]
    傅恒, 韩建辉, 宋荣彩, 等. 地质学基础[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2021.

    FU Heng, HAN Jianhui, SONG Rongcai, et al. Fundamentals of geology[M]. Beijing: Geological publishing House, 2021.
    [27]
    夏威, 于炳松, 王运海, 等. 黔北牛蹄塘组和龙马溪组沉积环境及有机质富集机理: 以RY1井和XY1井为例[J]. 矿物岩石, 2017, 37(3): 77-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201703011.htm

    XIA Wei, YU Bingsong, WANG Yunhai, et al. Study on the depositional environment and organic accumulation mechanism in the Niutitang and Longmaxi formation, North Guizhou province: a case study of well Renye 1 and well Xiye 1[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2017, 37(3): 77-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201703011.htm
    [28]
    CAWOOD P A, PISAREVSKY S A. Was Baltica right-way-up or upside-down in the Neoproterozoic[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2006, 163(5): 753-759.
    [29]
    LI Zhengxiang, BOGDANOVA S V, COLLINS A S, et al. Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: a synthesis[J]. Precambrian Research, 2008, 160(1/2): 179-210.
    [30]
    ZHAO Hanqing, ZHANG Shihong, ZHU Maoyan, et al. Paleomagnetic insights into the Cambrian biogeographic conundrum: did the North China craton link Laurentia and East Gondwana?[J]. Geology, 2021, 49(4): 372-376.
    [31]
    刘国恒, 黄志龙, 姜振学, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖相页岩纹层发育特征及储集意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3): 408-417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201503003.htm

    LIU Guoheng, HUANG Zhilong, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. The characteristic and reservoir significance of lamina in shale from Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(3): 408-417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201503003.htm
    [32]
    孔祥鑫, 姜在兴, 韩超, 等. 束鹿凹陷沙三段下亚段细粒碳酸盐纹层特征与储集意义[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(4): 19-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201604003.htm

    KONG Xiangxin, JIANG Zaixing, HAN Chao, et al. Laminations characteristics and reservoir significance of fine-grained carbonate in the lower 3rd member of Shahejie Formation of Shulu Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiendy, 2016, 23(4): 19-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201604003.htm
    [33]
    郭来源, 刘峥君, 解习农. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组三段纹层状泥页岩地球化学特征及其成因解释[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(1): 133-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201801014.htm

    GUO Laiyuan, LIU Zhengjun, XIE Xinong. Geochemical characteristics and genetic interpretation of laminated shales of the third member of Hetaoyuan Formation in the Biyang Depression of Nanxiang Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(1): 133-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201801014.htm
    [34]
    MORA C F, KWAN A K H. Sphericity, shape factor, and convexity measurement of coarse aggregate for concrete using digital image processing[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(3): 351-358.
    [35]
    吴维义, 郑昊林, 杨兴莲. 贵州金沙寒武系牛蹄塘组的古盘虫类三叶虫[J]. 古生物学报, 2018, 57(3): 304-311. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSWX201803004.htm

    WU Weiyi, ZHENG Haolin, YANG Xinglian. A study of the eodiscoid trilobite from the Cambrian Niutitang Formation of Jinsha, Guizhou[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 2018, 57(3): 304-311. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSWX201803004.htm
    [36]
    刘璠. 滇东地区寒武系第二统软舌螺动物研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2021.

    LIU Fan. Palaeobiological study of hyoliths from the Cambrian Series 2 Lagerstätten in eastern Yunnan, China[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2021.
    [37]
    赵立可, 李文皓, 和源, 等. 四川盆地麦地坪组—筇竹寺组沉积充填规律及勘探意义[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(3): 30-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT202003006.htm

    ZHAO Like, LI Wenhao, HE Yuan, et al. Sedimentation and filling laws of Maidiping-Qiongzhusi formations in Sichuan Basin and their significance of oil and gas geological exploration[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020, 43(3): 30-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT202003006.htm
    [38]
    谷志东, 殷积峰, 姜华, 等. 四川盆地宣汉—开江古隆起的发现及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6): 893-904. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201606007.htm

    GU Zhidong, YIN Jifeng, JIANG Hua, et al. Discovery of Xuanhan-Kaijiang paleouplift and its significance in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6): 893-904. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201606007.htm
    [39]
    DEMAISON G J, MOORE G T. Anoxic environments and oil source bed genesis[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1980, 2(1): 9-31.
    [40]
    王玉满, 陈波, 李新景, 等. 川东北地区下志留统龙马溪组上升洋流相页岩沉积特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1092-1102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201810002.htm

    WANG Yuman, CHEN Bo, LI Xinjing, et al. Sedimentary characte-ristics of upwelling facies shale in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, northeast Sichuan area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(10): 1092-1102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201810002.htm
    [41]
    杨平, 汪正江, 谢渊, 等. 黔北下寒武统牛蹄塘组烃源岩的生物标志物特征和沉积环境[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(11): 1910-1921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201211017.htm

    YANG Ping, WANG Zhengjiang, XIE Yuan, et al. The biomarker characteristics and sedimentary environment of Early Cambrian Niutitang Formation source rock in northern Guizhou[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31(11): 1910-1921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201211017.htm
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. 郭彤楼,邓虎成,赵爽,魏力民,何建华. 四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组新类型页岩气形成机理与勘探突破. 石油勘探与开发. 2025(01): 57-69 .
    2. 周春宇,和源,李宗泽,周刚,杨岱林,孙奕婷,张亚,文华国,刘四兵. 川中北部地区下寒武统沧浪铺组一段碳酸盐岩微孔隙特征及其成因. 石油实验地质. 2025(02): 311-322 . 本站查看
    3. 杨毅,朱祥,张雷,徐祖新,代林呈. 四川盆地北部灯影组四段台内地区油气来源及成藏过程. 石油实验地质. 2025(02): 384-394 . 本站查看
    4. 甯波,任大忠,王虎,张瀚澎,郭建林,付宁海,李俊键,李天,李启晖. 致密砂岩气藏微观孔隙结构多尺度联合表征. 断块油气田. 2024(01): 34-41 .
    5. 周丹,范存辉. 四川盆地及其周缘页岩气富集条件研究进展. 化工设计通讯. 2024(03): 106-108 .
    6. 何骁,郑马嘉,刘勇,赵群,石学文,姜振学,吴伟,伍亚,宁诗坦,唐相路,刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因. 石油与天然气地质. 2024(02): 420-439 .
    7. 解馨慧,邓虎成,胡蓝霄,李勇,毛金昕,刘佳杰,张鑫,李柏洋. 湖相细粒沉积岩颗粒微观力学特征及类型划分——以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组7段页岩为例. 石油与天然气地质. 2024(04): 1079-1088 .
    8. 文龙,罗冰,孙豪飞,张本健,明盈,陈骁,张玺华,张文杰,徐唱,徐亮. 四川盆地上二叠统龙潭组深层煤岩气成藏地质特征及资源潜力. 天然气工业. 2024(10): 22-32 .
    9. 杨一茗,石学文,刘文平,吴伟,何一凡,李彦佑,张亦弛,杨雨然,朱逸青,刘佳,吴喆. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷槽中段筇竹寺组沉积演化模式与有利相带优选. 天然气地球科学. 2024(12): 2106-2120 .
    10. 文龙,明盈,孙豪飞,张本健,陈骁,陈世达,李松,李海琪. 四川盆地二叠系龙潭组深层煤岩气地质特征与勘探潜力——以NT1H井为例. 石油与天然气地质. 2024(06): 1678-1685 .
    11. 郭彤楼,熊亮,何建华,魏力民,闫亮. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组新类型页岩气勘探发现及启示. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 1-14 .
    12. 董晓霞,冯少柯. 基于神经网络聚类分析的深层页岩储层岩相识别——以川南筇竹寺组为例. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 61-73 .
    13. 熊亮,钟怡江,董翼昕,彭明鸿. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组沉积格局及沉积体系. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 15-31 .
    14. 史洪亮,邓明全,周桦,何建华,徐浩. 川南筇竹寺组页岩储层孔隙连通及油气充注特征. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 74-90 .
    15. 魏力民,冯少柯,顾战宇. 四川盆地中西部筇竹寺组凹槽相区页岩沉积环境及发育模式. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 45-60 .
    16. 罗成波,周兴付,欧彪,刘伟,张生军,张玉胜,王治国. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组井研—犍为地区页岩气安全优快钻井技术及应用. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 146-154 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 26.3 %FULLTEXT: 26.3 %META: 64.6 %META: 64.6 %PDF: 9.0 %PDF: 9.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.0 %其他: 10.0 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Falls Church: 0.2 %Falls Church: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.2 %Russian Federation: 0.2 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %东营: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %亚特兰大: 0.2 %亚特兰大: 0.2 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.3 %克拉玛依: 0.3 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %内江: 0.3 %内江: 0.3 %北京: 5.4 %北京: 5.4 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %华盛顿: 0.2 %华盛顿: 0.2 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大庆: 0.6 %大庆: 0.6 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天水: 0.3 %天水: 0.3 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宜宾: 0.4 %宜宾: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广元: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %库比蒂诺: 0.3 %库比蒂诺: 0.3 %张家口: 3.9 %张家口: 3.9 %成都: 3.9 %成都: 3.9 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %无锡: 2.2 %无锡: 2.2 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %普赖恩维尔: 0.2 %普赖恩维尔: 0.2 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %比勒陀利亚: 0.4 %比勒陀利亚: 0.4 %沃思堡: 0.4 %沃思堡: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.4 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.4 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %海得拉巴: 0.6 %海得拉巴: 0.6 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %焦作: 0.1 %焦作: 0.1 %玉溪: 0.1 %玉溪: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %石河子: 0.2 %石河子: 0.2 %聊城: 0.1 %聊城: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 41.5 %芒廷维尤: 41.5 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莫斯科: 2.2 %莫斯科: 2.2 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %西宁: 5.5 %西宁: 5.5 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %诺沃克: 0.4 %诺沃克: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %资阳: 0.1 %资阳: 0.1 %达州: 0.4 %达州: 0.4 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %遂宁: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %都伯林: 0.1 %都伯林: 0.1 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %阿什本: 0.4 %阿什本: 0.4 %雅安: 0.2 %雅安: 0.2 %青岛: 0.9 %青岛: 0.9 %首尔: 0.2 %首尔: 0.2 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaFalls ChurchRochesterRussian Federation[]上海东京东莞东营乌鲁木齐亚特兰大保定克拉玛依六安内江北京十堰华盛顿南京南通南阳吉安呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴圣彼得堡大同大庆大连天水天津太原安康宜宾宣城常州常德广元广州库比蒂诺张家口成都扬州无锡昆明晋城普赖恩维尔杭州武汉比勒陀利亚沃思堡沈阳法兰克福法尔肯施泰因济南海得拉巴淄博深圳温州渭南漯河焦作玉溪盘锦石家庄石河子聊城芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科蚌埠西宁西安诺沃克贵阳资阳达州运城遂宁遵义邯郸都伯林重庆金华长沙阿什本雅安青岛首尔香港马鞍山黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (900) PDF downloads(126) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return