Volume 46 Issue 2
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Dong, WANG Haijun, YANG Cheng, ZHANG Junhui, ZHAO Shanshan, HU Yongliang. Stratigraphic and sedimentary characteristics of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Beichuan Tongkou section, middle Longmen Mountain[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(2): 278-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402278
Citation: WANG Dong, WANG Haijun, YANG Cheng, ZHANG Junhui, ZHAO Shanshan, HU Yongliang. Stratigraphic and sedimentary characteristics of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Beichuan Tongkou section, middle Longmen Mountain[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(2): 278-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402278

Stratigraphic and sedimentary characteristics of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Beichuan Tongkou section, middle Longmen Mountain

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402278
  • Received Date: 2023-03-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-02-08
  • Publish Date: 2024-03-28
  • The Qixia Formation in the foothills of Longmen Mountain in the western Sichuan Basin is gaining attention for oil and gas exploration. However, exploration of the Qixia Formation in the middle Longmen Mountain is insufficient. Consequently, it is essential to understand its stratigraphic sedimentary characteristics for guiding natural gas exploration. This study focuses on the Beichuan Tongkou section, combines field measurements, thin-section observation and trace element analyses to investigate the sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary features of the Qixia Formation, thereby defining its sedimentary environment. Within the Beichuan Tongkou section, which spans from the Liangshan Formation to the Qixia Formation, researchers have identified two third-order and one fourth-order sequence boundaries, delineating one third-order sequence and two fourth-order sequences. The sedimentary facies found in this interval include shore-swamp, open platform, and platform edge environments, which are further classified into four subfacies including open sea, intertidal sea, intra-platform beach, and platform edge beach. Additionally, three microfacies are identified including intra-platform bioclastic beach, platform edge bioclastic beach, and platform edge sand debris and bioclastic beach. The Qi1 member and lower part of the Qi2 member is located on an open platform, while the upper-middle part of the Qi2 member is found at the platform edge. This setup defines a sedimentary model for a carbonate-rimmed platform in the Qixia Formation of the middle Longmen Mountain. During the sedimentary period of the Qixia Formation, a warm, humid, and oxygen-rich marine environment supported abundant ancient organisms. In the highstand system tract of the upper-middle part of the Qi2 member, the Sr/Ba ratio is lowest, while the MgO/CaO ratio is highest, indicating elevated ancient water temperatures and specific chemical compositions. The m value, reflective of paleosalinity, is notably high, suggesting a shallow, high-energy platform edge environment away from the mainland. Thick, high-energy platform edge sand debris and bioclastic beaches in this area promote the development of high-quality porous dolomite reservoirs of beach facies. The sedimentary facies and reservoir conditions of the Qi2 member in the middle Longmen Mountain are comparable to those in other sections, making it a promising target for oil and gas exploration within the Qixia Formation and a potential strategic replacement area for reservoir expansion.

     

  • All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.
    The experiment was designed by WANG Dong and WANG Haijun. The experimental operation was completed by YANG Cheng, ZHANG Junhui, ZHAO Shanshan and HU Yongliang. The manuscript was drafted and revised by WANG Dong, WANG Haijun, ZHANG Junhui and ZHAO Shanshan. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.
  • loading
  • [1]
    马新华, 杨雨, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩大中型气田分布规律及勘探方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201901001.htm

    MA Xinhua, YANG Yu, WEN Long, et al. Distribution and exploration direction of medium- and large-sized marine carbonate gas fields in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201901001.htm
    [2]
    杨雨, 姜鹏飞, 张本健, 等. 龙门山山前复杂构造带双鱼石构造栖霞组超深层整装大气田的形成[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(3): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202203001.htm

    YANG Yu, JIANG Pengfei, ZHANG Benjian, et al. Formation of ultra-deep integrated giant gas field in Qixia Formation of Shuangyushi structure in the foothill complex structural belt of Longmen Mountain[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(3): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202203001.htm
    [3]
    任利明, 张连进, 王俊杰, 等. 7000 m以深复杂断裂成组气藏开发早期评价技术: 以川西北双鱼石构造栖霞组气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(7): 73-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202107011.htm

    REN Liming, ZHANG Lianjin, WANG Junjie, et al. Early-stage development evaluation technology for complex fault group gas reservoirs below 7 000 m: a case study of Qixia Formation gas reservoir in Shuangyushi structure of northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(7): 73-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202107011.htm
    [4]
    张本健, 尹宏, 李荣容, 等. 四川盆地西南部平探1井中二叠统栖霞组天然气勘探新突破及其意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(7): 34-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202007006.htm

    ZHANG Benjian, YIN Hong, LI Rongrong, et al. New breakthrough of natural gas exploration in the Qixia Formation of Middle Permian by well Pingtan 1 in the southwestern Sichuan Basin and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 34-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202007006.htm
    [5]
    文龙, 汪华, 徐亮, 等. 四川盆地西部中二叠统栖霞组天然气成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 68-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202106005.htm

    WEN Long, WANG Hua, XU Liang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of gas accumulation of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in western Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(6): 68-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202106005.htm
    [6]
    杨跃明, 陈聪, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地龙门山北段隐伏构造带特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(8): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201808004.htm

    YANG Yueming, CHEN Cong, WEN Long, et al. Characteristics of buried structures in the northern Longmenshan mountains and its significance to oil and gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(8): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201808004.htm
    [7]
    金文正, 汤良杰, 杨克明, 等. 龙门山冲断带构造特征研究主要进展及存在问题探讨[J]. 地质论评, 2008, 54(1): 37-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200801006.htm

    JIN Wenzheng, TANG Liangjie, YANG Keming, et al. Progress and problem of study on characters of the Longmen Mountain thrust belt[J]. Geological Review, 2008, 54(1): 37-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200801006.htm
    [8]
    刘文栋, 钟大康, 孙海涛, 等. 川西北中二叠统栖霞组沉积特征及古地貌响应[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(5): 1275-1291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202105018.htm

    LIU Wendong, ZHONG Dakang, SUN Haitao, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and paleogeomorphic responses of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(5): 1275-1291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202105018.htm
    [9]
    黄涵宇, 何登发, 李英强, 等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪梁山—栖霞组沉积盆地原型及其演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(4): 1317-1337. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704023.htm

    HUANG Hanyu, HE Dengfa, LI Yingqiang, et al. The prototype and its evolution of the Sichuan sedimentary basin and adjacent areas during Liangshan and Qixia stages in Permian[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4): 1317-1337. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704023.htm
    [10]
    陈洪德, 张成弓, 黄福喜, 等. 中上扬子克拉通海西—印支期(泥盆纪—中三叠世)沉积层序充填过程与演化模式[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(8): 2281-2298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201108007.htm

    CHEN Hongde, ZHANG Chenggong, HUANG Fuxi, et al. Filling process and evolutionary model of sedimentary sequence of Middle-Upper Yangtze craton in Hercynian-Indosinian (Devonian-Middle Triassic)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(8): 2281-2298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201108007.htm
    [11]
    陈竹新, 李伟, 王丽宁, 等. 川西北地区构造地质结构与深层勘探层系分区[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 397-408. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902026.htm

    CHEN Zhuxin, LI Wei, WANG Lining, et al. Structural geology and favorable exploration prospect belts in northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2): 397-408. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902026.htm
    [12]
    田景春, 张奇, 林小兵, 等. 四川盆地二叠系层序地层格架内的沉积与储层演化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.

    TIAN Jingchun, ZHANG Qi, LIN Xiaobing, et al. Sedimentation and reservoir evolution in the Permian sequence stratigraphic framework of the Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.
    [13]
    胡笙, 谭秀成, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(6): 1109-1126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX202006007.htm

    HU Sheng, TAN Xiucheng, LUO Bing, et al. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2020, 22(6): 1109-1126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX202006007.htm
    [14]
    张运波. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层及沉积模式[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2011.

    ZHANG Yunbo. Sequence stratigraphy and depositional models of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2011.
    [15]
    张耀续, 王利超, 谭秀成. 川北小南海剖面栖霞组岩石微相及沉积环境[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(5): 1049-1060. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202005014.htm

    ZHANG Yaoxu, WANG Lichao, TAN Xiucheng. Carbonate microfacies and sedimentary environment of Qixia Formation in Xiaonanhai section, northern Sichuan[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38(5): 1049-1060. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202005014.htm
    [16]
    魏国齐, 杨威, 万怡平, 等. 扬子地块西北缘二叠系—中三叠统层序地层与沉积相展布[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(3): 741-748. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201103014.htm

    WEI Guoqi, YANG Wei, WAN Yiping, et al. Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary facies distribution of the Permian-Middle Triassic in the northwestern margin of the Yangtze block[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3): 741-748. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201103014.htm
    [17]
    彭金宁, 杜崇娇, 李龙龙, 等. 四川盆地中二叠世岩相古地理及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(1): 49-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301049

    PENG Jinning, DU Chongjiao, LI Longlong, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography of Middle Permian in the Sichuan Basin and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(1): 49-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301049
    [18]
    何鲤, 罗潇, 刘莉萍, 等. 试论四川盆地晚二叠世沉积环境与礁滩分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(1): 28-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200801006.htm

    HE Li, LUO Xiao, LIU Liping, et al. A discussion on depositional environment in Late Permian and distribution of REEF-bank in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(1): 28-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200801006.htm
    [19]
    SCHOLLE P A, ARTHUR M A. Carbon isotope fluctuations in cretaceous pelagic limestones: potential stratigraphic and petroleum exploration tool[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1980, 64(1): 67-87.
    [20]
    邓小亮, 林良彪, 余瑜, 等. 川西北剑阁地区栖霞组地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(2): 198-209. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG202002008.htm

    DENG Xiaoliang, LIN Liangbiao, YU Yu, et al. Geochemical characteristics and palaeoenvironmental significance of Qixia Formation in Jiange area, Sichuan, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 47(2): 198-209. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG202002008.htm
    [21]
    田洋, 赵小明, 王令占, 等. 重庆石柱二叠纪栖霞组地球化学特征及其环境意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1035-1045. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201406005.htm

    TIAN Yang, ZHAO Xiaoming, WANG Lingzhan, et al. Geochemical characteristics and its paleoenvironmental implication of Permian Qixia Formation in Shizhu, Chongqing[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 1035-1045. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201406005.htm
    [22]
    李振清, 周洪瑞, 陈建强. 山东淄博地区上寒武统沉积地球化学特征及其层序地层学意义[J]. 现代地质, 2001, 15(4): 377-382. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200104003.htm

    LI Zhenqing, ZHOU Hongrui, CHEN Jianqiang. Sedimental geochemical characteristics and application of the Upper Cambrian in Zibo area, Shandong[J]. Geoscience, 2001, 15(4): 377-382. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200104003.htm
    [23]
    HATCH J R, LEVENTHAL J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of the depositional environment and geochemistry of the Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) Stark shale member of the Dennis limestone, Wabaunsee County, Kansas, U.S.A. [J]. Chemical Geology, 1992, 99(1/3): 65-82.
    [24]
    JONES B, MANNING D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 111(1/4): 111-129.
    [25]
    杨振宇, 沈渭洲, 郑连弟. 广西来宾蓬莱滩二叠纪瓜德鲁普统—乐平统界线剖面元素和同位素地球化学研究及地质意义[J]. 地质学报, 2009, 83(1): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200901001.htm

    YANG Zhenyu, SHEN Weizhou, ZHENG Liandi. Elements and isotopic geochemistry of Guadalupian-Lopingian boundary profile at the Penglaitan section of Laibin, Guangxi Province, and its geological implications[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2009, 83(1): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200901001.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (298) PDF downloads(27) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return