Jiang Xiaoqiong, Wang Shuyi, Fan Ming, Zhang Jianyong, Guan Honglin, Bao Yunjie. STUDY OF SIMULATION EXPERIMENT FOR CARBONATE ROCKS DISSOLUTION IN BURIAL DIAGENETIC ENVIRONMENT[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643
Citation: Jiang Xiaoqiong, Wang Shuyi, Fan Ming, Zhang Jianyong, Guan Honglin, Bao Yunjie. STUDY OF SIMULATION EXPERIMENT FOR CARBONATE ROCKS DISSOLUTION IN BURIAL DIAGENETIC ENVIRONMENT[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643

STUDY OF SIMULATION EXPERIMENT FOR CARBONATE ROCKS DISSOLUTION IN BURIAL DIAGENETIC ENVIRONMENT

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643
  • Received Date: 2008-06-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2008-11-06
  • Publish Date: 2008-12-28
  • Under the condition of the same pressure and different temperature where acetic acid,CO2 and H2S as solution,respectively,the experiments of dissolution for different type carbonate rocks have been performed the ability of dissolution of the dolostone is lower compared with the limestone.And the ability of dissolution of transitional type carbonate rocks is between limestone's and dolostone's.The results show that the ability of dissolution of dolomite is lower than calcite.Under the condition of the same temperature and different pressure where acetic acid as solution,when pressure is between 0.2 and 30MPa,the results show that the ability of dissolution of dolostone is lower than limestone.However,when pressure is 50MPa,the dissolution abilities of samples obviously increase.The increased extent is characterised that dissolution intensity of the dolostone is most large,intensity of limestones is most low and intensity of algal limestone is between dolostones and limestones.Based on previous results presumed when pressure increases,the dissolution intensity of dolostones is more than the limestone.However,the microcrystalline limestone dissolution of different particle size indicates that the dissolution rate of large particle size is 1.49 times larger than that small size.All these show that the dissolution extent depends on the main factors of specific surface area caused by contaction of fluid and minerals besides of mineral composition.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Mazzullo S J,Harris P M.Mesogenetic dissolution:Its role in porosity development in carbonate reservoirs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1992,76(5):607~620
    [2]
    饶丹,马绪杰,贾存善等.塔河油田主体区奥陶系缝洞系统与油气分布[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(6):589~592
    [3]
    覃建雄.鄂尔多斯盆地东部下奥陶统碳酸盐岩埋藏成岩事件研究[J].中国海上油气(地质),1994,8(1):45~54
    [4]
    赵宗举,王招明,吴兴宁等.塔里木盆地塔中地区奥陶系储层成因类型及分布预测[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):40~46
    [5]
    王一刚,刘划一,文应初等.川东北飞仙关组鲕滩储层分布规律、勘探方法与远景预测[J].天然气工业,2002,22(增刊):14~19
    [6]
    李建林,徐国盛,朱平等.川西洛带气田沙溪庙组储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(6):565~571
    [7]
    王瑞华,牟传龙,谭钦银等.达县-宣汉地区长兴组礁滩白云岩成岩作用与成岩环境研究[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2006,26(1):30~36
    [8]
    苏立萍,罗平,罗忠等.川东北飞仙关组鲕粒滩储层特征研究[J].天然气工业,2005,25(6):14~17
    [9]
    何宇彬,金玉璋,李廉.碳酸盐岩溶蚀机理研究[J].中国岩溶,1984,(2):12~16
    [10]
    杨俊杰,黄思静,张文征等.表生和埋藏成岩作用的温压条件下不同组成碳酸盐岩溶蚀成岩过程的实验模拟[J].沉积学报,1995,13(4):49~54
    [11]
    杨俊杰,张文征,黄思静等.埋藏成岩作用的温压条件下,白云岩溶解过程的实验模拟研究[J].沉积学报,1995,13(3):83~88
    [12]
    崔振昂,鲍征宇,张天付等.埋藏条件下碳酸盐岩溶解动力学实验研究[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(3):204~207
    [13]
    肖林萍.埋藏条件下碳酸盐岩实验室溶蚀作用模拟的热力学模型与地质勘探方向:以陕甘宁盆地下奥陶统马家沟组第五段为例[J].岩相古地理,1997,17(4):57~72
    [14]
    范明,蒋小琼,刘伟新等.不同温度条件下CO2水溶液对碳酸盐岩的溶蚀作用[J].沉积学报,2007,5(6):825~830
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3705) PDF downloads(1007) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return