Cheng Hong, Ren Wenbo, Zhang Yuchan, Zhen Jianwe. Main factors influencing reformation effects of massive acid fracturing reservoir[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2011, 33(S1): 107-111. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2011S1107
Citation: Cheng Hong, Ren Wenbo, Zhang Yuchan, Zhen Jianwe. Main factors influencing reformation effects of massive acid fracturing reservoir[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2011, 33(S1): 107-111. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2011S1107

Main factors influencing reformation effects of massive acid fracturing reservoir

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2011S1107
  • Received Date: 2010-12-20
  • Rev Recd Date: 2011-03-21
  • Publish Date: 2011-12-30
  • Fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in the Tahe Oil Field are complicated.Acid fracturingis required in 70%of the wells.In some wells with deep burial depth and high formation temperature,the former acid fracturing failed to connect reservoir effectively since fractures had not penetratedenough far away,resulting in feeding-flow lack,low yield and inefficient.Main factors influencingreformation effects of massive acid fracturing reservoir have been concluded as follows:a)Petroleumenrichment extent of the region where wells locate;b) Reservoir generation degree of the well-control-ling region;c) Reservoir connection condition after the former acid fracturing;d) Scale and parametersof acid fracturing.

     

  • [1]
    蔡大庆,周昊.塔河油田碳酸盐岩储层酸压技术应用[J].钻采工艺,2004,27(3):38-41.
    [2]
    敬路敏,夏辉,潘勇.塔河油田酸压工艺及酸压效果分析[J].油气井测试,2006,15(6):48-50.
    [3]
    陈波.塔河碳酸盐岩储层大型酸化压裂技术介绍[J].石油与天然气化工,2005,34(3):210-212.
    [4]
    张烨,赵文娜.塔河油田缝洞型碳酸盐储层重复酸压实践[J].新疆石油科技,2009,2(19):34-36.
    [5]
    杨亚东,杨兆中,蒋海,等.塔河油田酸化压裂工艺现状及研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2006(1):72-73.
    [6]
    黄燕飞.塔河油田托甫台地区奥陶系油藏深度酸压技术应用[J].天然气勘探与开发,2010,32(4):68-71.
    [7]
    [作者不祥].塔河油田超大规模酸压施工总结报告[R].乌鲁木齐:中石化西北油田分公司工程技术研究院,2010.
  • Relative Articles

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-0605101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.9 %FULLTEXT: 19.9 %META: 78.6 %META: 78.6 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.1 %其他: 5.1 %Grogol: 1.5 %Grogol: 1.5 %上海: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %北京: 2.7 %北京: 2.7 %哥伦布: 0.7 %哥伦布: 0.7 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.5 %漯河: 1.5 %芒廷维尤: 60.7 %芒廷维尤: 60.7 %芝加哥: 1.2 %芝加哥: 1.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %西宁: 19.7 %西宁: 19.7 %西雅图: 0.7 %西雅图: 0.7 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %雅加达: 0.7 %雅加达: 0.7 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他Grogol上海东莞佛山北京哥伦布天津宁波张家口扬州杭州武汉温州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科西宁西雅图长沙雅加达青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (633) PDF downloads(581) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return