Advanced Search
Volume 38 Issue 6
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2016  >  38(6): 850-856
Chen Siyu, Tian Hua, Liu Shaobo, Li Caixi, Hao Jiaqing, Zheng Yongping. Influence of bulk volume measurement on porosity error in tight reservoir core plug analysis[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(6): 850-856. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606850
Citation: Chen Siyu, Tian Hua, Liu Shaobo, Li Caixi, Hao Jiaqing, Zheng Yongping. Influence of bulk volume measurement on porosity error in tight reservoir core plug analysis[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(6): 850-856. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606850
shu

Influence of bulk volume measurement on porosity error in tight reservoir core plug analysis

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606850
  • 1.

    China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

  • 2. Key Laboratory of Basin Structure and Hydrocarbon Accumulation, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China

  • 3. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China

  • 4. Beijing Bridge Information Ltd, Beijing 100080, China

  • Received Date: 2016-06-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-10-20
  • Publish Date: 2016-11-28
    Abstract
  • Unconventional tight reservoir has a low porosity, which is usually less than 10%, while that of shale reservoir is even less than 5%. The porosity test error of helium injection method has been considered. A mathema-tical model is established for the error of porosity determination and the statistical data of source and error limit was obtained for volume measurement. (1) The error limit of porosity determination of tight reservoir using vernier caliper is 0.59%-2.47%, while that can be reduced to 0.38%-1.04% by using a high-precision 3D laser scanner. Different from conventional reservoirs, the porosity measurement accuracy of tight reservoir should be improved and analyzed. (2) The accuracy of all porosity determination methods cannot reach the industry standard (<0.5%), so a new standard is suggested that reducing the error limit standard (i.e. <1%). The demand of volume measurement was made based on the new standard. (3) An inverse proportion is found between porosity error and core plug length, so sample length should be longer than 3 cm to reduce porosity error.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(23)
  • [1]
    匡立春,王霞田,郭旭光,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油地质特征与勘探实践[J].新疆石油地质,2015,36(6):629-634. Kuang Lichun,Wang Xiatian,Guo Xuguang,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration practice of tight oil of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geo-logy,2015,36(6):629-634.
    [2]
    汪少勇,王社教,李登华,等.致密油地质风险分析方法与流程初探[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(3):1-7. Wang Shaoyong,Wang Shejiao,Li Denghua,et al.Preliminary geology risk analysis and process in tight oil reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(3):1-7.
    [3]
    张月,文慧俭,白东来,等.松辽盆地大安油田纳米级孔隙研究[J].断块油气田,2015,22(4):440-444. Zhang Yue,Wen Huijian,Bai Donglai,et al.Study on nanopore throat in Da'an Oilfield, Songliao Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2015,22(4):440-444.
    [4]
    陈旋,司学强,刘书强,等.马朗凹陷沉凝灰岩致密储集层特征及主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):40-44. Chen Xuan,Si Xueqiang,Liu Shuqiang,et al.Characteristics and main control factors of sedimentary tuff tight reservoirs in Malang Sag[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):40-44.
    [5]
    郝情情,孙雨,左银辉.页岩气成藏条件及中国页岩气勘探风险[J].新疆石油地质,2013,34(3):272-276. Hao Qingqing,Sun Yu,Zuo Yinhui.Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of shale gas and exploration risks in China[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2013,34(3):272-276.
    [6]
    刘富林,李红星,周建平,等.海底沉积物孔隙度Micro-CT扫描测定方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2014,14(18):168-172. Liu Fulin,Li Hongxing,Zhou Jianping,et al.Study on seabed sediment porosity measurement method by micro-CT scanning[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(18):168-172.
    [7]
    曹永娜.利用CT扫描技术实现对岩心微观驱替过程的研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(6):64-68. Cao Yongna.Study of microscopic blooding process using CT scanning technique[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2015,15(6):64-68.
    [8]
    韩文学,高长海,韩霞.核磁共振及微、纳米CT技术在致密储层研究中的应用[J].断块油气田,2015,22(1):62-66. Han Wenxue,Gao Changhai,Han Xia.Application of NMR and micrometer and nanometer CT technology in research of tight re-servoir[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2015,22(1):62-66.
    [9]
    罗少成,成志刚,林伟川,等.基于核磁共振测井的致密砂岩储层孔喉空间有效性定量评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):16-21. Luo Shaocheng,Cheng Zhigang,Lin Weichuan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of pore-throat space in tight sandstone reservoirs based on nuclear magnetic resonance log[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):16-21.
    [10]
    王胜.用核磁共振分析岩石孔隙结构特征[J].新疆石油地质,2009,30(6):768-770. Wang Sheng.Analysis of rock pore structural characteristic by nuclear magnetic resonance[J] Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(6):768-770.
    [11]
    王磊,李克文,赵楠,等.致密油储层孔隙度测定方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(4):49-53. Wang Lei,Li Kewen,Zhao Nan,et al.Methods research of poro-sity determination for tight oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(4):49-53.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 岩心分析方法:SY/T 5336-2006[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2007. National Development and Reform Commission.Practices for core analysis:SY/T 5336-2006[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007.
    [13]
    Bustin R M,Bustin A,Ross D,et al.Shale gas opportunities and challenges.San Antonio,Texas:AAPG Annual Convention,2008.
    [14]
    Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Energy D,et al.Structural characte-rization of gas shales on the micro-and nano-scales[C]//Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.Calgary,Alberta,Canada:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
    [15]
    Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,Rai C S,et al.Micro-structural studies of gas shales[C]//SPE Unconventional Gas Confe-rence.Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010:1-25.
    [16]
    Bustin R M,Bustin A M M,Cui A,et al.Impact of shale properties on pore structure and storage characteristics[C]//SPE Shale Gas Production Conference.Fort Worth,Texas,USA:So-ciety of Petroleum Engineers,2008:1-28.
    [17]
    田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.致密储层孔隙度测定参数优化[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(3):334-339. Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.Parameter optimization of tight reservoir porosity determination[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2012,34(3):334-339.
    [18]
    李庆扬,王能超,易大义.数值分析[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1995:3-8. Li Qingyang,Wang Nengchao,Yi Dayi.Numerical analysis[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,1995:3-8.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.游标、带表和数显卡尺:GB/T 21389-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Vernier dial and digital display calipers:GB/T21389-2008[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2008.
    [20]
    王解先,侯东亚,段兵兵.三维激光扫描仪在堆积物体积计算中的应用[J].测绘通报,2013(7):54-56. Wang Jiexian,Hou Dongya,Duan Bingbing.Applications of three-dimensional laser scanner in accumulation of volume calculation[J].Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping,2013(7):54-56.
    [21]
    宋振,郝华东,周晓雪,等.基于三维激光扫描仪法的大型立式罐容量的计量[J].油气储运,2013,32(12):1367-1373. Song Zhen,Hao Huadong,Zhou Xiaoxue,et al.Capacity measurement of large vertical tank based on 3D laser scanner method[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2013,32(12):1367-1373.
    [22]
    韦雪花,王永国,郑君,等.基于三维激光扫描点云的树冠体积计算方法[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(7):235-240. Wei Xuehua,Wang Yongguo,Zheng Jun,et al.Tree crown volume calculation based on 3-D laser scanning point clouds data[J].Transactions of The Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2013,44(7):235-240.
    [23]
    郑德华,沈云中,刘春.三维激光扫描仪及其测量误差影响因素分析[J].测绘工程,2005,14(2):32-34. Zheng Dehua,Shen Yunzhong,Liu Chun.3D laser scanner and its effect factor analysis of surveying error[J].Engineering of Surveying and Mapping,2005,14(2):32-34.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Jinqing, TAO Guoliang, HUANG Dai, LUO Cuijuan, LIU Lingbo, YANG Yunfeng. Issues in shale oil core porosity measurement[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2025, 47(2): 433-440. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025020433
    [2]JIANG Wenbin, LIN Mian, JI Lili, CAO Gaohui, ZHANG Likuan, DOU Wenchao, ZHENG Siping, CHEN Zhuo, QIU Xin. On-line microscopic imaging investigation on oil charging characteristics in tight reservoirs[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 366-377. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302366
    [3]TANG Xianglu, XIAO Hanmin, JIANG Zhenxue, LIU Xuewei, YANG Zaiquan, LIU Ge, ZHANG Fan. Pore and throat characterization of tight reservoirs based on the methods of alloy injection and large-field image stitching[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(1): 185-192. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301185
    [4]SUN Zhongliang, LI Zhiming, SHEN Baojian, ZHU Qingmin, LI Chuxiong. NMR technology in reservoir evaluation for shale oil and gas[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(5): 930-940. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205930
    [5]XU Wenming, JIANG Qigui, LIU Weixin, TAO Guoliang, ZHANG Wentao, QIAN Menhui, CAO Tingting, BAO Yunjie, LI Zhiming. Micro-pore structure in an inter-salt shale oil reservoir and the relationship with physical properties in the fourth section of the third member of Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 565-574. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004565
    [6]XU Yongqiang, HE Yonghong, BU Guangping, CHEN Lin, LIU Linyu, ZHU Yushuang. Establishment of classification and evaluation criteria for tight reservoirs based on characteristics of microscopic pore throat structure and percolation: a case study of Chang 7 reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(3): 451-461. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903451
    [7]BAO Yunjie, LI Zhiming, YANG Zhenheng, QIAN Menhui, LIU Peng, TAO Guoliang. Porosity measurement error and its control method[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(4): 593-597. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904593
    [8]Zhang Xi, Sun Wei, Yang Xiaojing, Li Hao. Quantitative calculation of tight sandstone reservoir porosity evolution based on different diagenesis:A case study of Chang 63 reservoir in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(1): 126-133. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701126
    [9]Shi Baohong, Huang Jing, Chen Liu, Yang Fan, Lü Jianwen. Compaction factors of tight reservoirs in the seventh member of Yanchang Formation in the central Ordos Basin during the Late Triassic[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 528-535. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604528
    [10]Qi Yalin, Zhao Yande, Wang Ke, Huang Jinxiu, Lü Jianwen, Zhang Xuefeng. Reservoir main controlling factors of Chang8 sandstones in Jiyuan and Huangling areas, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(3): 334-340. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503334
    [11]Yu Jian, Ma Jie, Lu Jungang, Cao Yan, Feng Shengbin, Li Weicheng. Application of mercury injection and rate-controlled mercury penetration in quantitative characterization of microscopic pore structure of tight reservoirs: A case study of the Chang7 reservoir in Huachi-Heshui area, the Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(6): 789-795. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201506789
    [12]Wang Congxiao, Luo Qun, Song Yan, Jiang Zhenxue, Liu Yunsheng. Nano-meter petroleum geology: Discussion about geology theory and research method of unconventional petroleum[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(6): 659-667. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201406659
    [13]Tian Hua, Zhang Shuichang, Liu Shaobo, Ma Xingzhi, Zhang Hong. Parameter optimization of tight reservoir porosity determination[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2012, 34(3): 334-339. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201203334
    [14]Xie Runcheng, Zhou Wen, Yan Ningping, Song Rongcai, Zhao Ankun, Wang Xin. STUDY ON CONTROL FACTORS OF QUALITY OF COMPACT SANDSTONE RESERVOIR-TAKING HE8 FORMATION OF THE JINGBIAN GAS FIELD AS AN EXAMPLE[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(2): 120-123. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201002120
    [15]Liu Weixin, Wang Yanbin, Zhang Wentao, Yang Qi, Zhang Qinzeng. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIAGENESIS OF UPPER PALAEOZOIC RESERVOIR SANDSTONES AND THE PRODUCTION CAPACITY IN DANIUDI GAS FIELD, THE ORDOS BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2008, 30(6): 557-563. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806557
    [16]Gao Boyu, Zhou Yongyi, Peng Shimi. STUDY ON THE STRESS SENSIBILITY OF RESERVOIR POROSITY[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2005, 27(2): 197-202. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200502197
    [17]WANG Guo-li, ZHANG Yong-sheng, YANG Yu-qing, QI Zhi-xian. EVALUATION OF NONSANDSTONE RESERVOIRS BETWEEN SALT BEDS OF THE PALEOGENE QIANJIANG FORMATION IN THE QIANJIANG DEPRESSION OF THE JIANGHAN BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2004, 26(5): 462-468. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200405462
    [18]WEI Fu-jun, HE Fa-qi, PU Ren-hai. PETROPHYSICS AND EVALUATION OF THE KALASHAYI FORMATION, TAHE OILFIELD[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2004, 26(4): 344-348. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200404344
    [19]QIU Liwei, KANG Zhijiang. APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO RESERVOIR DESCRIPTION[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1999, 21(2): 166-169. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199902166
    [20]Zhang Chunsheng. RESERVOIR TRANSVERSE PREDICTION BY SEISMOLOGY FOR EOGENE IN YM 7—9 WELLS REGION[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1997, 19(4): 354-358. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199704354
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 周显青，康招阳，韩佳静，闫会杰，冯萧雨. 基于计算机图像识别技术的米饭表面孔隙率测定方法研究. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 83-89 .
    2. 翁剑桥，李夏伟，戚明辉，张烨毓，王禹，张伟. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩孔隙度实验方法分析. 岩矿测试. 2022(04): 598-605 .
    3. 陈维堃，腾格尔，张春贺，方镕慧，张聪，白名岗，王梓，夏响华. 页岩纳米有机孔结构表征技术研究进展. 岩矿测试. 2022(06): 906-919 .
    4. 任建华，卢比，任韶然. 改进的压力衰竭法测试页岩孔渗参数. 油气藏评价与开发. 2020(01): 49-55 .
    5. TIAN Hua，ZOU Caineng，LIU Shaobo，HONG Feng，FAN Junjia，GUI Lili，HAO Jiaqing. Reservoir Porosity Measurement Uncertainty and its Influence on Shale Gas Resource Assessment. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition). 2020(02): 233-242 .
    6. 鲍云杰，李志明，杨振恒，钱门辉，刘鹏，陶国亮. 孔隙度测定误差及其控制方法研究. 石油实验地质. 2019(04): 593-597 . 本站查看
    7. 张路锋，周福建，张士诚，王晋，李明辉，刘健伕. 基于压力脉冲法的储层基质压裂液伤害评价. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(03): 89-94+111 .
    8. 田华，柳少波，洪峰，袁苗. 关于页岩孔隙度与渗透率测定国家标准(GB/T 34533-2017)的思考与建议. 中国标准化. 2018(S1): 36-39 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 20.6 %FULLTEXT: 20.6 %META: 77.2 %META: 77.2 %PDF: 2.2 %PDF: 2.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.3 %其他: 4.3 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Norman: 0.4 %Norman: 0.4 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.9 %[]: 0.9 %三门峡: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.3 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %东爪哇省: 0.4 %东爪哇省: 0.4 %伊斯坦布尔: 0.3 %伊斯坦布尔: 0.3 %北京: 5.9 %北京: 5.9 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %埃德蒙顿: 0.4 %埃德蒙顿: 0.4 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %洛阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %瑟普赖斯: 1.3 %瑟普赖斯: 1.3 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 67.2 %芒廷维尤: 67.2 %莫斯科: 0.9 %莫斯科: 0.9 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 6.4 %西宁: 6.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %首尔: 0.6 %首尔: 0.6 %其他其他ChinaIndiaNormanRussian FederationUnited States[]三门峡上海东爪哇省伊斯坦布尔北京十堰南昌台北台州哥伦布商丘埃德蒙顿弗吉尼亚州张家口扬州杭州武汉沈阳洛阳湘潭漯河瑟普赖斯盘锦芒廷维尤莫斯科衢州西宁西雅图贵阳运城遵义重庆长沙长治青岛首尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1070) PDF downloads(286) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return