Luo Jianbo, Liu Shiyin. Technical challenges and solutions of drilling fluid techniques in Silurian in Tuoputai 3 block of Tahe oilfield[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(S1): 75-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2017S1075
Citation: Luo Jianbo, Liu Shiyin. Technical challenges and solutions of drilling fluid techniques in Silurian in Tuoputai 3 block of Tahe oilfield[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(S1): 75-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2017S1075

Technical challenges and solutions of drilling fluid techniques in Silurian in Tuoputai 3 block of Tahe oilfield

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2017S1075
  • Received Date: 2017-07-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-09-22
  • Publish Date: 2017-11-15
  • Sandstones and mudstones interbedded in the Silurian Kepingtag Formation in the Tuoputai 3 block of Tahe oilfield, about 340-420 m thick for each layer and generally buried at a well depth of 5 570-6 200 m. The interlayer thickness and burial depth gradually increased from north to south. By analyzing the lithology of the Kepingtag Formation and the causes for wellbore instability and well leakage, combining with the laboratory evaluations of inhibitors and anti-collapse plugging agents, we proposed a formula for potassium amine anti-collapse drilling fluid, which is suitable for the Tuoputai 3 block. Some detailed measures to solve collapse and leakage were put forward, combining physical anti-collapse methods with chemical ones. Segmental static plugging and drilling plugging were focused on. A combination of high softening point emulsified asphalt and rigid particle was applied to solve collapse. Velocity was controlled and drilling fluid was circulated when drilling up and down. This drilling fluid system achieved good effects in well TP346X. The drilling diameter of the Kepingtag Formation was improved by 7.45%. Collapse was significantly reduced and there was no leakage or other complex situations.

     

  • [1]
    张国,陈红壮,高伟,等.塔河侧钻水平井硬脆性泥页岩井壁失稳研究及对策[J].钻采工艺,2016,39(3):4-7.
    [2]
    王成岭,李作宾,蒋金宝,等. 塔河油田12区超深井快速钻井技术[J].石油钻探技术,2010,38(3):17-21.
    [3]
    黄万龙,楼一珊,钟文建,等.玉北地区新型强抑制性聚胺钻井液体系研究[J].新疆石油地质,2013,34(6):719-722.
    [4]
    曹成,蒲晓林,王贵,等.水基钻井液用防塌封堵剂封堵效果实验研究[J].应用化工,2015,44(2):247-249.
    [5]
    王贵,曹成,蒲晓林,等.塔河油田桑塔木组钻井液优化与室内评价[J].钻采工艺,2015,38(5):73-76.
    [6]
    汪露,邓小卫. TP267X三开制长裸眼井优快钻井钻井液技术[J].断块油气田,2016,21(4):533-536.
  • Relative Articles

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.9 %FULLTEXT: 18.9 %META: 79.5 %META: 79.5 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.7 %其他: 2.7 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 1.1 %China: 1.1 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %Russian Federation: 0.3 %Russian Federation: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.5 %三门峡: 0.5 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %克孜勒苏: 0.3 %克孜勒苏: 0.3 %克拉玛依: 0.3 %克拉玛依: 0.3 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %喀什: 0.2 %喀什: 0.2 %巴格达: 0.2 %巴格达: 0.2 %张家口: 2.3 %张家口: 2.3 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 30.7 %芒廷维尤: 30.7 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %荆州: 0.2 %荆州: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.9 %莫斯科: 0.9 %西宁: 44.0 %西宁: 44.0 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 8.4 %郑州: 8.4 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阿什本: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaIndiaRussian Federation三门峡上海临汾克孜勒苏克拉玛依北京台州喀什巴格达张家口昆明晋城杭州武汉淄博深圳湘潭漯河盘锦石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥荆州莫斯科西宁运城遵义邯郸郑州长沙长治阿什本青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1037) PDF downloads(119) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return