Advanced Search
Volume 40 Issue 3
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2018  >  40(3): 439-447
WU Xiaohe. Complex fault interpretation of buried hills: A case study of Zhuanghai region in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(3): 439-447. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201803439
Citation: WU Xiaohe. Complex fault interpretation of buried hills: A case study of Zhuanghai region in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(3): 439-447. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201803439
shu

Complex fault interpretation of buried hills: A case study of Zhuanghai region in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201803439
  • 1.

    School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

  • 2. Geophysical Research Institute of SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying, Shandong 257022, China

  • Received Date: 2017-12-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-03-16
  • Publish Date: 2018-05-28
    Abstract
  • The Zhuanghai oil field is located in the north of the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Drilling data illustrated that the pre-Tertiary formations of the Zhuanghai area are rich in oil. However, complicated structures developed in the pre-Tertiary formations with unclear fault directions and distributions, which made the exploration of the pre-Tertiary structures very difficult. The nature of faults was determined by considering the mechanism of fault evolution. The key techniques for the interpretation of faults of different natures were studied to accurately describe the fault system and deduce fault development patterns to define the structural features. The Zhuanghai area has experienced several stages of deformation, including regional uplift, stable structure, extrusion, stable structure, tension, tense-shearing and compresso-shearing. The tectonic compressions during the Indosinian and the late Yanshanian periods formed thrust tectonics, which laid the foundation for buried hills. The extensional strike-slips in the Himalayan period made the buried hills more complicated. A fault interpretation was made, mainly focusing on reversed faults. The derivative of stratigraphic thickness change rate and dip can be calculated to interpret reversed faults. Time slices and fault planes were combined to interpret strike-slip faults. Coherent cube, ant-colony and 3D visualization were combined to interpret normal faults. The Paleozoic in the Zhuanghai area developed NNE-trending reverse faults and EW-trending extensional faults, with thrust, negative reversal and strike-slip fault types, showing a complex pattern of "barriers and depressions".

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    张克鑫,漆家福,马宝军,等.济阳坳陷桩海地区构造演化特征研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(3):40-43. ZHANG Kexin,QI Jiafu,MA Baojun,et al.Study on the tectonic evolution of Zhuanghai area in Jiyang Depression[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2005,20(3):40-43.
    [2]
    徐春华,王亚琳.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷凹隆结构类型及其对沉积的控制作用[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(5):587-592. XU Chunhua,WANG Yalin.Depression and apophysis structure type and its controls on deposition in the Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(5):587-592.
    [3]
    赵锡奎,徐国强,罗志立,等.济阳坳陷前中生界潜山形成的构造过程与油气聚集规律[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):596-600. ZHAO Xikui,XU Guoqiang,LUO Zhili,et al.Structural process of buried hill formation and oil and gas accumulation law in Pre-Mesozoic of Jiyang Depression,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2004,31(6):596-600.
    [4]
    李欣,闫伟鹏,崔周旗,等.渤海湾盆地潜山油气藏勘探潜力与方向[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(2):140-144. LI Xin,YAN Weipeng,CUI Zhouqi,et al.Prospecting potential and targets of buried-hill oil and gas reservoirs in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(2):140-144.
    [5]
    谭明友,邴进营.金学新,等.山东北部滨海地区负反转断层及古生界负反转结构成因分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(6):844-850. TAN Mingyou,BING Jinying,JIN Xuexin,et al.Origin analyses of both negative inversion faults and negative inversion structures in Palaeozoic Group in coastal region of north Shandong Province[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,1996,31(6):844-850.
    [6]
    彭传圣,林会喜,刘华,等.渤海湾盆地构造演化与古生界原生油气成藏[J].高校地质学报,2008,14(2):206-216. PENG Chuansheng,LIN Huixi,LIU Hua,et al.Tectonic evolution of the Bohai Bay basin and the Palaeozoic original oil and gas reservoirs[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2008,14(2):206-216.
    [7]
    林会喜,方旭庆,李凌,等.鲁北济阳坳陷沾化凹陷东部潜山的发育及油气成藏控制因素[J].地质通报,2006,25(9-10):1160-1167. LIN Huixi,FANG Xuqing,LI Ling,et al.Development of buried hills of the eastern Zhanhua Subbasin,Jiyang Depression,northern Shandong,China and controlling factors of the formation of petroleum accumulations[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2006,25(9-10):1160-1167.
    [8]
    杨品荣,陈洁,蔡进功,等.济阳坳陷构造转型期及其石油地质意义[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(3):5-7. YANG Pinrong,CHEN Jie,CAI Jingong,et al.Structural transitional stages in Jiyang Depression and their significance on petroleum geology[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2001,8(3):5-7.
    [9]
    周廷全,陈俊侠.济阳坳陷桩西古潜山储层裂缝的分形特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(5):1-5. ZHOU Tingquan,CHEN Junxia.Fractal characteristics of fracture in Zhuangxi buried-hill reservoir,Jiyang Depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2011,35(5):1-5.
    [10]
    王毅,陆克政,任安身.济阳坳陷东北部中生代构造运动和火山活动及盆地演化[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1994,18(2):1-8. WANG Yi,LU Kezheng,REN Anshen.Tectogenesis and volcanism and the basin evolution of the Mesozoic Era in the northeast of Jiyang Depression[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,1994,18(2):1-8.
    [11]
    郝晓红,晏玉环.深度域地震资料解释探讨[J].海洋石油,2014,34(2):20-24. HAO Xiaohong,YAN Yuhuan.Seismic data interpretation after PSDM in depth domain[J].Offshore Oil,2014,34(2):20-24.
    [12]
    谭明友,刘福贵,董臣强,等.埕北30潜山构造演化与油气富集规律研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(2):134-137. TAN Mingyou,LIU Fugui,DONG Chenqiang,et al.Study for evolution of CB30 buried hill structure and role of oil-gas accumulation[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2002,37(2):134-137.
    [13]
    邹娟,戴俊生,张丹丹,等.构造活动强度划分断陷盆地构造区划:以饶阳凹陷为例[J].石油学报,2014,35(2):294-302. ZOU Juan,DAI Junsheng,ZHANG Dandan,et al.Structural divisions of rift basin based on the intensity of tectonic activity:A case study from the Raoyang Sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(2):294-302.
    [14]
    徐敏,梁虹.川东北高陡复杂构造区三维地震精细构造解释技术[J].石油物探,2015,54(2):197-202. XU Min,LIANG Hong.3D seismic fine structural interpretation technology in high-steep complicated area,northeast Sichuan Basin[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2015,54(2):197-202.
    [15]
    张明振,付瑾平,印兴耀.桩海地区的走滑和挤压构造特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(2):5-7. ZHANG Mingzhen,FU Jinping,YIN Xingyao.Characters of strike-slip and extrusion structure in Zhuanghai region[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2006,13(2):5-7.
    [16]
    陈洁,董冬,邱明文.济阳坳陷内的负反转构造及其石油地质意义[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):201-206. CHEN Jie,DONG Dong,QIU Mingwen.Negative inversion structure in the Jiyang Depression and its petroleum geological significance[J].Experimental Petroleum Geology,1999,21(3):201-206.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 张波. 济阳坳陷孤西潜山带构造演化及其对油气差异富集的控制. 油气地质与采收率. 2024(02): 29-38 .
    2. 张波，王永诗，黄铮，王浩. 济阳坳陷沾化东部古——中生界潜山构造样式与成藏模式. 中国石油勘探. 2024(02): 46-57 .
    3. 林会喜，熊伟，王勇，秦峰，景安语，王秀红，张明华，冯月琳，刘静. 济阳坳陷埕岛潜山油气成藏特征. 油气地质与采收率. 2021(01): 1-9 .
    4. 王晔磊，邱隆伟，杨勇强，吴宛秋，杨保良，乔雨鹏. 济阳坳陷义和庄—大王庄地区二叠系储集层成岩作用及孔隙演化. 新疆石油地质. 2021(06): 676-682 .
    5. 马立驰，王永诗，景安语. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷隐蔽潜山油藏新发现及其意义. 石油实验地质. 2020(01): 13-18 . 本站查看
    6. 王双龙，吕坐彬，韩雪芳，程奇，房娜. 气测资料在变质岩潜山裂缝有效性评价及水淹层识别中的应用. 特种油气藏. 2020(02): 70-77 .
    7. 刘良刚. 最大似然法在桩海潜山内幕断裂识别中的应用. 复杂油气藏. 2020(01): 28-33 .
    8. 刘良刚. 基于多尺度随机建模的潜山裂缝储层预测技术. 科学技术与工程. 2020(15): 5948-5953 .
    9. 赵婷婷，罗小平，吴飘，徐云龙，罗健，孙延旭. 辽西低凸起JZ25-1S太古界潜山原油地球化学特征及来源分析. 石油实验地质. 2020(06): 981-990 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.2 %FULLTEXT: 19.2 %META: 78.4 %META: 78.4 %PDF: 2.4 %PDF: 2.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.3 %其他: 4.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %城南: 0.4 %城南: 0.4 %多伦多: 0.3 %多伦多: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 4.6 %张家口: 4.6 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %沧州: 0.3 %沧州: 0.3 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %潜江: 0.3 %潜江: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 62.0 %芒廷维尤: 62.0 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %衢州: 0.9 %衢州: 0.9 %西宁: 10.5 %西宁: 10.5 %许昌: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.9 %阿什本: 0.9 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %其他ChinaIndia[]三门峡上海临汾北京十堰南京台州哥伦布城南多伦多天津巴音郭楞廊坊张家口成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沧州济南湖州湘潭漯河潜江盘锦石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科衢州西宁许昌贵阳运城遵义郑州长沙长治阿什本青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1396) PDF downloads(144) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return