Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China

GUO Shaobin; WANG Zilong; MA Xiao

doi:10.11781/sysydz202103377

Volume 43 Issue 3

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2021 > 43(3): 377-385

GUO Shaobin, WANG Zilong, MA Xiao. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(3): 377-385. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377

Citation:

GUO Shaobin, WANG Zilong, MA Xiao. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(3): 377-385. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377

Citation:

PDF( 645 KB)

Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377

School of Energy, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2021-01-03
Rev Recd Date: 2021-04-09
Publish Date: 2021-05-28

Abstract

Abstract

The shale gas exploration of marine-continental transitional facies in China has not yet gained a significant success. To analyze and predict the exploration prospect of transitional shale gas, the distribution, organic geochemical and reservoir characteristics of transitional shale in some key areas of China were compared. The transitional shale is widely distributed in China and is characterized by the thin thickness of single layer and the rapid variation of lithology. The kerogens of transitional shale are mainly of type Ⅲ. Except for carbonaceous mudstone, the total organic content is generally low, and the hydrocarbon generation potential is the lowest. The dominant pore types of transitional shale are inorganic pores and micro-fractures, while the organic pores on the other hand were not developed. The pore volume and pore specific surface area of transitional shale are lower than those of marine shale, the reservoir space is relatively insufficient, and the gas adsorption capacity is poor. Transitional shale has a remarkable high content of clay minerals, less brittle minerals, low porosity and permeability, and poor reservoir physical properties indicating unconducive for the late-stage development. Results show that marine shale is still the most favorable area for shale gas exploration, and the exploration prospect of shale gas in transitional facies may not be regarded as good as that of continental shale gas which has a higher thermal mature degree in some aspects.
- mud shale,
- shale gas,
- marine-continental transitional face,
- exploration prospect,
- China

FullText(HTML)

References(40)

References

[1]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202001001.htm ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202001001.htm
[2]	李剑, 佘源琦, 高阳, 等. 中国天然气产业发展形势与前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(4): 133-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202004024.htm LI Jian, SHE Yuanqi, GAO Yang, et al. Natural gas industry in China: development situation and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(4): 133-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202004024.htm
[3]	王淑芳, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中美海相页岩气地质特征对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(9): 1666-1678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201509008.htm WANG Shufang, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. A comparative study of the geological feature of marine shale gas between China and the united states[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(9): 1666-1678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201509008.htm
[4]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6): 641-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201006003.htm ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Shejiao, et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6): 641-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201006003.htm
[5]	孙彩蓉, 唐书恒, 魏建光. 中国南方海相页岩气与华北煤系页岩气储层特征差异分析[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(3): 166-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201703041.htm SUN Cairong, TANG Shuheng, WEI Jianguang. The differences of reservoir features between southern marine shale gas and northern coal-bearing shale gas in China[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2017, 26(3): 166-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201703041.htm
[6]	周德华, 孙川翔, 刘忠宝, 等. 川东北地区大安寨段陆相页岩气藏地质特征[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(5): 32-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202005005.htm ZHOU Dehua, SUN Chuanxiang, LIU Zhongbao, et al. Geological characteristics of continental shale gas reservoir in the Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(5): 32-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202005005.htm
[7]	姜振学, 宋岩, 唐相路, 等. 中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3): 617-628. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202003020.htm JIANG Zhenxue, SONG Yan, TANG Xianglu, et al. Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3): 617-628. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202003020.htm
[8]	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 561-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804004.htm MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong. China's shale gas exploration and development: understanding and practice[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 561-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804004.htm
[9]	何贵松, 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 等. 中国南方3套海相页岩气成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 57-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201901007.htm HE Guisong, HE Xipeng, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Analysis of accumulation conditions of three sets of marine shale gas in southern China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1): 57-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201901007.htm
[10]	杜燕, 刘超, 高潮, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区陆相页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202002004.htm DU Yan, LIU Chao, GAO Chao, et al. Progress, challenges and prospects of the continental shale gas exploration and development in the Yanchang exploration area of the Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202002004.htm
[11]	祁攀文, 薛培, 赵谦平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾地区山西组页岩气储层特征与评价[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(4): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201904004.htm QI Panwen, XU Pei, ZHAO Qianping, et al. Research on evaluation methods and characteristics of shale gas reservoirs in Shanxi Formation in Xiasiwan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(4): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201904004.htm
[12]	李平, 李盛富, 刘宇, 等. 沁水盆地煤系页岩气成藏模式分析[J]. 地质与勘探, 2018, 54(2): 395-403. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT201802019.htm LI Ping, LI Shengfu, LIU Yu, et al. Reservoir models of the coal measure shale gas in the Qinshui Basin[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2018, 54(2): 395-403. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT201802019.htm
[13]	翟刚毅, 王玉芳, 刘国恒, 等. 中国二叠系海陆交互相页岩气富集成藏特征及前景分析[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2020, 40(3): 102-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD202003011.htm ZHAI Gangyi, WANG Yufang, LIU Guoheng, et al. Enrichment and accumulation characteristics and prospect analysis of the Permian marine conticental multiphase shale gas in China[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2020, 40(3): 102-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD202003011.htm
[14]	徐姣, 孙庆莉, 段杰, 等. 四川盆地东部海相页岩分布及综合评价[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2019, 13(5): 14-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRJJ201905004.htm XU Jiao, SUN Qingli, DUAN Jie et al. Evaluation on distribution of marine shale, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Techno-logy and Economy, 2019, 13(5): 14-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRJJ201905004.htm
[15]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(10): 11-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201810003.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LIU Ruobing, et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of Permian marine-continent transitional facies shale gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(10): 11-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201810003.htm
[16]	闫德宇, 黄文辉, 陆小霞, 等. 下扬子区海陆过渡相不同沉积环境页岩气成藏条件对比[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(7): 1778-1787. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201607024.htm YAN Deyu, HUANG Wenhui, LU Xiaoxia, et al. Contrast of reservoir-forming conditions of marine-continental transitional shale gas in different sedimentary environments in the Lower Yangtze area of China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(7): 1778-1787. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201607024.htm
[17]	李昌伟, 陶士振, 董大忠. 国内外页岩气形成条件对比与有利区优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(5): 986-1000. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201505023.htm LI Changwei, TAO Shizhen, DONG Dazhong. Comparison of the formation condition of shale gas between domestic and abroad and favorable areas evaluation[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(5): 986-1000. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201505023.htm
[18]	郭曼, 李贤庆, 张明扬, 等. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩气成藏条件及有利区评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2015, 43(2): 37-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDKT201502008.htm GUO Man, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Mingyang, et al. Reservoir-forming conditions and evaluation of favorable area of shale gas in Niutitang Formation in northern Guizhou[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2015, 43(2): 37-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDKT201502008.htm
[19]	陈娟. 下扬子宣城地区二叠系海相页岩储层特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020. CHEN Juan. The characteristics of permian marine shale reservoirs in Xuancheng area of Lower Yangtze[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2020.
[20]	张艺凡. 中国南方典型地区海相页岩储层孔隙特征与渗透性研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020. ZHANG Yifan. Study of pore structure and permeability characteristics of marine shale in typical area of South China[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2020.
[21]	徐浩. 南方海相页岩储层微观孔隙表征方法及含气特征分析[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2019. XU Hao. Micropores characterization method and gas content analysis for marine shale reservoirs in Southern China[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2019.
[22]	赵静. 陆相页岩气成藏条件分析以松辽盆地南部S洼槽为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(3): 290-293. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201903005.htm ZHAO Jing. Accumulation conditions of shale gas in continental facies: taking S depression of Songliao Basin as an example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26(3): 209-293. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201903005.htm
[23]	左如斯, 杨威, 王乾右, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组陆相页岩岩相控制下的微观储集特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(6): 22-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201906004.htm ZUO Rusi, YANG Wei, WANG Qianyou, et al. Lithofacies-control microscopic reservoir characterization of the continental shale in the Xujiahe Formation of Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(6): 22-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201906004.htm
[24]	魏祥峰, 黄静, 李宇平, 等. 元坝地区大安寨段陆相页岩气富集高产主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403022.htm WEI Xiangfeng, HUANG Jing, LI Yuping, et al. The main factors controlling the enrichment and high production of Da'anzhai Member continental shale gas in Yuanba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403022.htm
[25]	陈果, 刘哿行, 李洪玺, 等. 四川盆地上三叠统须家河组陆相页岩气资源潜力分析[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2019, 13(5): 21-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRJJ201905005.htm CHEN Guo, LIU Gexing, LIU Hongxi, et al. Resource potential of continental shale gas in Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Technology, 2019, 13(5): 21-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRJJ201905005.htm
[26]	马奔奔, 操应长, 王艳忠, 等. 渤南洼陷北部陡坡带沙四上亚段成岩演化及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(1): 170-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201501018.htm MA Benben, CAO Yingchang, WANG Yanzhong, et al. Diagenetic evolution and its influence on physical properties of reservoir in the northern steep zone of the Bonan Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 170-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201501018.htm
[27]	李昂, 丁文龙, 张国良, 等. 滇东地区马龙区块筇竹寺组海相页岩储层特征及对比研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 176-189. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602021.htm LI Ang, DING Wenlong, ZHANG Guoliang, et al. Reservoir characteristics of marine shale in the Malong block of eastern Yunnan province and comparison analysis[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 176-189. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602021.htm
[28]	包书景, 林拓, 聂海宽, 等. 海陆过渡相页岩气成藏特征初探: 以湘中坳陷二叠系为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601006.htm BAO Shujing, LIN Tuo, NIE Haikuan, et al. Preliminary study of the transitional facies shale gas reservoir characteristics: taking Permian in the Xiangzhong Depression as an example[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601006.htm
[29]	郭少斌, 付娟娟, 高丹, 等. 中国海陆交互相页岩气研究现状与展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(5): 535-540. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505535 GUO Shaobin, FU Juanjuan, GAO Dan, et al. Research status and prospects for marine-continental shale gases in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(5): 535-540. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505535
[30]	赵文智, 李建忠, 杨涛, 等. 中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 499-510. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201604002.htm ZHAO Wenzhi, LI Jianzhong, YANG Tao, et al. Geological diffe-rence and its significance of marine shale gases in South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 499-510. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201604002.htm
[31]	HUANG Liang, NING Zhengfu, WANG Qing, et al. Effect of organic type and moisture on CO₂/CH₄ competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO₂ sequestration and enhanced CH₄ recovery[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 210: 28-43.
[32]	KO L T, LOUCKS R G, ZHANG Tongwei, et al. Pore and pore network evolution of Upper Cretaceous Boquillas (Eagle Ford-equivalent) mudrocks: results from gold tube pyrolysis experiments[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2016, 100(11): 1693-1722.
[33]	WOOD D A, HAZRA B. Characterization of organic-rich shales for petroleum exploration & exploitation: a review—part 2: geochemistry, thermal maturity, isotopes and biomarkers[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2017, 28(5): 758-778.
[34]	PANNO S V, HACKLEY K C, LOCKE R A, et al. Formation waters from Cambrian-age strata, Illinois Basin, USA: constraints on their origin and evolution[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2013, 122: 184-197.
[35]	高凤琳, 宋岩, 姜振学, 等. 黏土矿物对页岩储集空间及吸附能力的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(3): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201703001.htm GAO Fenglin, SONG Yan, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Influence of clay minerals on shale storage space and adsorptive capacity[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(3): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201703001.htm
[36]	黄金亮, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 69-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201201009.htm HUANG Jinliang, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 69-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201201009.htm
[37]	刘小平, 李文奇. 基于热模拟实验的富有机质泥页岩孔隙演化研究进展[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(22): 8849-8859. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS202022002.htm LIU Xiaoping, LI Wenqi. Research advance on pore evolution of organic-rich shale based on thermal simulation experiment[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(22): 8849-8859. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS202022002.htm
[38]	杨潇, 姜振学, 宋岩, 等. 渝东南牛蹄塘组与龙马溪组高演化海相页岩全孔径孔隙结构特征对比研究[J]. 高校地质学报, 2016, 22(2): 368-377. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201602017.htm YANG Xiao, JIANG Zhenxue, SONG Yan, et al. A comparative study on whole-aperture pore structure characteristics between Niutitang and Longmaxi formation of high-matruity marine shales in southeastern Chongqingelt[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2016, 22(2): 368-377. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201602017.htm
[39]	王子龙, 郭少斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区山西组泥页岩孔隙表征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 99-107. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901099 WANG Zilong, GUO Shaobin. Pore characterization of shale in Shanxi Formation, Yan'an area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 99-107. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901099
[40]	熊健, 罗丹序, 刘向君, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 16-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201602003.htm XIONG Jian, LUO Danxu, LIU Xiangjun, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of shale pore structure of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2): 16-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201602003.htm

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Tables(7)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (811) PDF downloads(232)

Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content