Exploration potential and favorable direction of tight gas in Middle Jurassic Xiashaximiao Formation in Sichuan Basin

DUAN Wenshen

doi:10.11781/sysydz202103424

Volume 43 Issue 3

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2021 > 43(3): 424-431

DUAN Wenshen. Exploration potential and favorable direction of tight gas in Middle Jurassic Xiashaximiao Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(3): 424-431. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103424

Citation:

DUAN Wenshen. Exploration potential and favorable direction of tight gas in Middle Jurassic Xiashaximiao Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(3): 424-431. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103424

Citation:

PDF( 2568 KB)

Exploration potential and favorable direction of tight gas in Middle Jurassic Xiashaximiao Formation in Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103424

DUAN Wenshen

Research Institute of Exploration and Development, SINOPEC Southwest Petroleum Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Received Date: 2020-07-20
Rev Recd Date: 2021-04-20
Publish Date: 2021-05-28

Abstract

Abstract

Tight gas is an important gas-pool type for natural gas resource and output increment in China. The Middle Jurassic Xiashaximiao Formation (J₂x) is an important target for the exploration of tight oil and gas in the Sichuan Basin. Based on decades of exploration practice and studies on accumulation conditions of tight gas, it was indicated that the J₂x formation gas reservoir is a secondary structural lithologic gas reservoir with multiple layers, and was constrained by source, position and sedimentary facies. The major characteristics of these reservoirs are (1) the dark mudstones, carbonaceous mudstones and coal seams in the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing and Upper Triassic Xujiahe formations provided abundant natural gas sources; (2) the mud-packed sand structure formed by the combination of various channel sand bodies and shale in sedimentary systems such as alluvial fans and deltas was favorable for the enrichment of natural gas; (3) the widely distributed "estheria shale" or purple-red mud shale layer acted as regional cap rock; (4) three major paleo-uplifts and three major depressions formed after the Himalayan Movement, developed a series of structures on the top of the Xiashaximiao Formation, which was favorable for the formation of gas-bearing traps distributed throughout the basin and (5) the faults from the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation to the Xiashaximiao Formation provided migration channels for far-source gas reservoirs, while gas in the Ziliujing Formation could migrate to near-source reservoirs through small faults or micro-fractures. Thus a tight gas accumulationmodel of the Xiashaximiao Formation was established. The Xiashaximiao Formation possesses the foundation for forming large and medium-sized gas fields. The western part of Sichuan Basin has the largest potential for gas exploration and followed by the northern and southern parts. In the central Sichuan Basin, the reservoir-forming conditions are poorly configured and made its exploration potential poor.
- tight sandstone gas,
- accumulation pattern,
- exploration prospect,
- Xiashaximiao Formation,
- Middle Jurassic,
- Sichuan Basin

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 257-264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203002.htm DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, WU Xiaoqi. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203002.htm
[2]	汪泽成, 邹才能, 陶士振, 等. 大巴山前陆盆地形成及演化与油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油学报, 2004, 25(6): 23-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200406006.htm WANG Zecheng, ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, et al. Analysis on tectonic evolution and exploration potential in Dabashan Foreland Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2004, 25(6): 23-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200406006.htm
[3]	郑荣才, 彭军, 吴朝容. 陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2001, 19(2): 249-255. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200102014.htm ZHENG Rongcai, PENG Jun, WU Chaorong. Grade division of base-level cycles of terrigenous basin and its implications[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2001, 19(2): 249-255. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200102014.htm
[4]	陈恭洋, 晋静, 罗迎春, 等. 沉积相控制下致密砂岩气藏分布特征: 以四川盆地川西坳陷中段蓬莱镇组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 467-477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703006.htm CHEN Gongyang, JIN Jing, LUO Yingchun, et al. Characteristics of tight sandstone gas reservoir distribution under control of sedimentary facies: a case study from the Penglaizhen Formation in the central Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 467-477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703006.htm
[5]	文华国, 郑荣才, 叶泰然, 等. 米仓山—大巴山前陆盆地下沙溪庙组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2005, 25(1): 83-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200501016.htm WEN Huaguo, ZHENG Rongcai, YE Tairan, et al. High resolution sequence stratigraphy of the Lower Shaximiao Formation in the foreland basin of Micang-Daba Mountain[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2005, 25(1): 83-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200501016.htm
[6]	黄滢竹, 龚文平, 张方. 成都凹陷下沙溪庙组物源分析[J]. 长江大学学报(自然版), 2014, 11(31): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL201431010.htm HUANG Yingzhu, GONG Wenping, ZHANG Fang. Study on provenance of Lower Shaximiao Formation in Chengdu Sag[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 11(31): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL201431010.htm
[7]	王玮, 黄东, 易海永, 等. 淡水湖相页岩小层精细划分及地球化学特征: 以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(5): 724-730. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201905724 WANG Wei, HUANG Dong, YI Haiyong, et al. Stratigraphic division and geochemical characteristics of freshwater lacustrine shale: a case study of Jurassic Da'anzhai section, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petro-leum Geology and Experiment, 2019, 41(5): 724-730. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201905724
[8]	钱利军, 欧莉华, 郝强. 川西孝泉下沙溪庙组储层特征研究及主控因素[J]. 中国西部科技, 2015, 14(10): 33-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBKJ201510010.htm QIAN Lijun, OU Lihua, HAO Qiang. Reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of the Middle Jurassic formation in Xiaoquan area of western Sichuan[J]. Science and Technology of West China, 2015, 14(10): 33-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBKJ201510010.htm
[9]	叶素娟, 吕正祥. 川西新场气田下沙溪庙组致密储层特征及储集性影响因素[J]. 矿物岩石, 2010, 30(3): 96-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201003013.htm YE Sujuan, LÜ Zhengxiang. Reservoir characterization and factors influencing reservoir characteristics of the Lower Shaximiao Formation in Xinchang gas field, western Sichuan, China[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2010, 30(3): 96-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201003013.htm
[10]	陈迎宾, 王彦青, 胡烨. 川西坳陷中段侏罗系气藏特征与富集主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(5): 561-565. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505561 CHEN Yingbin, WANG Yanqing, HU Ye. Characteristics and main factors controlling the Jurassic gas reservoirs in the middle section of the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(5): 561-565. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505561
[11]	王威, 徐国盛, 倪更生, 等. 川西苏码头构造侏罗系次生气藏成藏条件研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2009, 31(1): 74-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200901074 WANG Wei, XU Guosheng, NI Gengsheng, et al. The research on accumulation condition for secondary gas pool in Penglaizhen Formation, the Sumatou structure of west Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2009, 31(1): 74-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200901074
[12]	段文燊, 张虹. 新场气田J₃p含气砂体预测研究[J]. 矿物岩石, 1999, 19(2): 37-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS902.007.htm DUAN Wenshen, ZHANG Hong. The research on the prediction of J₃p gas-bearing sand of Xinchang gas field[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 1999, 19(2): 37-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS902.007.htm
[13]	段文燊, 吴朝容. 川西岩性气藏地震勘探关键技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(4): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201104003.htm DUAN Wenshen, WU Chaorong. Key technologies of seismic exploration in lithologic gas reservoir of western Sichuan[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(4): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201104003.htm
[14]	吴朝容, 段文燊, 蒋晓红. 河道砂体识别技术[J]. 石油物探, 2003, 42(2): 204-207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYWT200302010.htm WU Chaorong, DUAN Wenshen, JIANG Xiaohong. Identification of channel sand[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2003, 42(2): 204-207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYWT200302010.htm
[15]	王旭, 李祖友, 严小勇, 等. 川西侏罗系气藏动态特征及开采对策[J]. 中外能源, 2015, 20(2): 53-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZW201502018.htm WANG Xu, LI Zuyou, YAN Xiaoyong, et al. Dynamic character and production countermeasure for Jurassic gas reservoirs in west Sichuan[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2015, 20(2): 53-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZW201502018.htm
[16]	王大洋, 王峻. 川西前陆盆地中侏罗统沙溪庙组沉积相及平面展布特征研究[J]. 四川地质学报, 2010, 30(3): 255-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCDB201003003.htm WANG Dayang, WANG Jun. Sedimentary facies and its distribution of the Middle Jurrasic Shaximiao Formation in the West Sichuan Foreland Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2010, 30(3): 255-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCDB201003003.htm

Relative Articles

[1]	WANG Pengwei, SHEN Baojian, LIU Zhongbao, LI Min, LI Qianwen, RONG Jia, WANG Qianru. Characteristics and main controlling factors of organic pore development in continental shales of the Lianggaoshan Formation in the Fuxing area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(3): 499-509. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202403499
[2]	LI Longlong, TAO Guoliang, DU Chongjiao, PENG Jinning, LUO Kaiping, CHEN Yongfeng, ZUO Zongxin, JIANG Xiaoqiong, WANG Yuanzheng, LU Yongde. Main controlling factors and exploration direction of gas reservoir in Jialingjiang Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(5): 1050-1062. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024051050
[3]	MENG Xianwu, LIU Yong, SHI Guoshan, CHEN Lan, ZHU Lan, CAI Zuohua. The structural evolution of the middle section of the West Sichuan Depression in the Sichuan Basin controlled the hydrocarbon accumulation in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(6): 986-995. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106986
[4]	LI Gang, BAI Guoping, GAO Ping, MA Shenghui, CHEN Jun, QIU Haihua. Geological characteristics and distribution of global primary hydrocarbon accumulations of Precambrian-Lower Cambrian[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(6): 958-966. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106958
[5]	WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, BAO Hanyong, WU Jing, DU Wei, WANG Pengwei, PENG Zeyang, LU Ting. Diagenetic evolution of key minerals and its controls on reservoir quality of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale of Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(6): 996-1005. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106996
[6]	YANG Wei, XIE Wuren, YU Lingjie, WEI Guoqi, JIN Hui, FAN Ming, SHEN Juehong, HAO Cuiguo, WANG Xiaodan, LIU Weihong. Dissolution experiments and geological implications of tight sandstones in the Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 655-663. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104655
[7]	NI Kai, WANG Mingfa, LI Xiang. Enrichment model of shale gas in southeastern Sichuan Basin: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Dingshan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 580-588. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104580
[8]	ZHAI Changbo, DENG Mo, CAO Qinggu, XIAO Xiong, HE Guisong, CHEN Feiran, QIU Jianhua, LIU Xu, ZHANG Changjiang. Basic characteristics and exploration potential of shale gas in Longtan Formation of Upper Permian in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(6): 921-932. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106921
[9]	LIANG Xiwen, LI Le. Geological conditions and exploration potential for shale gas in Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in the region of western Hubei-eastern Chongqing[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(3): 386-394. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103386
[10]	YANG Yu, LUO Bing, ZHANG Benjian, XIAO Di, XIAO Wenyao, CAO Jian. Differential mechanisms of organic matter accumulation of source rocks in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation and implications for gas exploration fields in Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 611-619. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104611
[11]	GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, ZHANG Wentao, LI Yuping, WEI Xiangfeng, SHEN Baojian. Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749
[12]	XIE Yuhong. Gas resources and accumulation model of BZ19-6 Archean buried-hill large-scale gas reservoir in Bozhong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(5): 858-866. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005858
[13]	LI Yanjun, XIA Jiwen, LI Minglong, PU Hongguo, GENG Chao, WANG Hao. Spatial-temporal modelling of oil and gas accumulation in Changxing Formation in the Shunan area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(6): 877-885. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202006877
[14]	Wang Jia, Tan Xianfeng, Tian Jingchun, Luo Chao, Ran Tian, Chen Qing, Li Xia, Zeng Chunlin. Constraints of hydrocarbon migration in Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin on shale gas accumulation[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(6): 755-762. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706755
[15]	Xu Wen, Li Hao, Chen Yanzhe. Oil and gas source and reservoir characteristics in Fulongquan Subsag, Changling Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(3): 334-340. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201703334
[16]	Jiang Yuqiang, Guo Guian, Chen Yicai, Xie Wei. GAS FORMING MECHANISMS AND ACCUMULATION MODELS OF THE XUJIAHE FORMATION IN HEBAOCHANG REGION, THE SOUTH OF SICHUAN BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(4): 314-318. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201004314
[17]	Sun Yipu, Wang Chuangang, Wang Yi, Yang Weili, Xu Huazheng, Liu Wenbin, Wu Tianhong. GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EXPLORATION POTENTIAL OF MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN PINGLIANG FOMATION IN THE ORDOS BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2008, 30(2): 162-168. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200802162
[18]	Hu Shouzhi, Wang Tingdong, Fu Xiaowen, Chen Shijia, Luo Yuhong, Tang Jing. NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION POTENTIAL OF SINIAN IN THE MIDDLE OF SICHUAN BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2005, 27(3): 222-225. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200503222
[19]	Ye Jun, Zhu Tong, Zhao Zejiang. A STUDY OF GAS RESERVIORS OF UPPER SHAXIMIAO FORMATION (J₂s) AND ITS ORIGIN IN XINCHANG GAS FIELD, WEST SICHUAN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1998, 20(4): 332-339. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199804332
[20]	Deng Tao. TECTONIC MECHANISM AND POOLING MODEL OF THE CALEDONIAN PALEOSWELL IN THE SICHUAN BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1996, 18(4): 356-360. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199604356

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(21)

1.	关旭，李建海，唐青松，韦滕强，张少敏，王小娟，朱讯. 川中地区金秋气田侏罗系沙一段有利含气区预测. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2025(01): 131-141 .
2.	王小娟，陈双玲，谢继容，马华灵，朱德宇，庞小婷，杨田，吕雪莹. 川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素. 岩性油气藏. 2024(01): 78-87 .
3.	何江，杨羿，陈文，夏茂龙，贾松，何开来，张迎春，刘彦成. 窄河道型致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素——以天府气田金华区块沙溪庙组为例. 断块油气田. 2024(01): 1-10 .
4.	王小娟，张少敏，庞小婷，杨曦冉，李晓芳，葛新锐，蔡来星，杨田. 四川盆地天府气田中侏罗统沙溪庙组砂岩储层致密化机理及其与油气充注的耦合关系. 天然气工业. 2024(06): 33-43 .
5.	陈春宇，梁庆韶，田景春，余瑜，王旭丽，林小兵. 川西地区沙溪庙组储层特征及双向物源条件下孔隙差异性演化. 矿物岩石. 2024(02): 108-121 .
6.	叶鉴文，严黎，朱佳婕，杨蕊瑗，徐慧兰，杨成. 沙溪庙组致密砂岩开发效果主控因素数值模拟研究. 计量与测试技术. 2024(09): 97-100 .
7.	李德，李宇，杨天爽. 临兴区块致密砂岩气储层破裂压力预测方法研究. 石油工业技术监督. 2023(01): 70-74+80 .
8.	段正鑫，刘一锋，楼章华，刘忠群. 川西坳陷三叠系须家河组油气富集与地层压力关系. 石油实验地质. 2023(01): 72-79+88 . 本站查看
9.	唐大海，王旭丽，曾琪，李梅，尹宏，刘柏，杨涛，汤潇，黄嵌，梁庆韶，余瑜. 四川盆地西南部沙溪庙组致密砂岩低渗储层特征及形成机理. 科学技术与工程. 2023(01): 143-154 .
10.	郭建春，路千里，刘壮，曾凡辉，郭彤楼，刘言，刘林，邱玲. “多尺度高密度”压裂技术理念与关键技术——以川西地区致密砂岩气为例. 天然气工业. 2023(02): 67-76 .
11.	胡东风，李真祥，魏志红，段金宝，缪志伟，潘磊，黎承银，段华. 四川盆地北部地区巴中1HF井侏罗系河道砂岩油气勘探突破及意义. 天然气工业. 2023(03): 1-11 .
12.	杨雨，谢继容，曹正林，文龙，王小娟，肖尧，杨建，唐青松，唐大海，李明秋，关旭，曾青高，陈伟华，陈康，肖红林. 四川盆地天府气田沙溪庙组大型致密砂岩气藏形成条件及勘探开发关键技术. 石油学报. 2023(06): 917-932 .
13.	郝雪峰，唐屹，彭宇，潘蒙，杨荣，贺洋. 四川盆地西南部乐山地区砂岩型铼钼矿地质特征及超常富集成矿. 地质与勘探. 2023(04): 734-746 .
14.	苏楠，陈竹新，杨威，王丽宁，李文正，杨春龙，黎荣，张璐，马雪莹，张豪. 川中北部侏罗系正断层特征及有利勘探方向. 天然气地球科学. 2023(09): 1581-1594 .
15.	罗炫，陈克勇，雷一文，刘文磊，崔靖，唐迅，聂焕然. 川南地区沙溪庙组浅层致密砂岩沉积微相及储集物性. 石化技术. 2023(10): 186-188 .
16.	张小菊，邓虎成，徐争启，朱德宇，段博瀚，王小娟，伏美燕，李傥，凌灿，马自立，雍洋. “双源”控制的窄河道致密砂岩气富集高产模式——以四川盆地金秋气田中侏罗统沙溪庙组为例. 天然气工业. 2023(10): 34-46 .
17.	徐昊垠，张华，郑伟姣，陈挺，卢伟. 四川盆地沙溪庙组致密气泥岩层段改造现场实践. 山东石油化工学院学报. 2023(03): 40-44 .
18.	谢格云，田云英，刘柏，樊世海，马宇含，张祎蕾. 川西南部地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组优质储层形成条件与控制因素. 天然气工业. 2022(07): 45-54 .
19.	徐加祥，希尔艾力·伊米提，杨立峰，付颖，张艳博，王湘婷. 支撑剂在非贯穿型裂缝网络中的输送特征模拟. 断块油气田. 2022(04): 532-538 .
20.	杨春龙，苏楠，芮宇润，郑越，王晓波，张欲清，金惠. 四川盆地中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密气成藏条件及勘探潜力. 中国石油勘探. 2021(06): 98-109 .
21.	范宇，汤继周，陈伟华，张卓，唐波涛，杨文涛. 河道致密砂岩螺旋射孔完井压裂优化设计. 测井技术. 2021(06): 646-656 .

Other cited types(10)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(9)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (993) PDF downloads(178)