ZHAO Yongqiang, YUN Lu, WANG Bin, GENG Feng, LI Haiying, GU Yi, LIU Yongli. Main constrains and dynamic process of Ordovician hydrocarbon accumulation, central and western Tahe Oil Field, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 758-766. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105758
Citation: ZHAO Yongqiang, YUN Lu, WANG Bin, GENG Feng, LI Haiying, GU Yi, LIU Yongli. Main constrains and dynamic process of Ordovician hydrocarbon accumulation, central and western Tahe Oil Field, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 758-766. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105758

Main constrains and dynamic process of Ordovician hydrocarbon accumulation, central and western Tahe Oil Field, Tarim Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105758
  • Received Date: 2021-04-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-08-08
  • Publish Date: 2021-09-28
  • Diversified types of oil and gas resources have been discovered in the Ordovician strata of central and western parts of the Tahe Oil Field, Tarim Basin. The formation contains oil in the vertical direction as a whole, and its accumulation process appeared to be extremely complicated. The dynamic process of oil and gas accumulation in the central and western parts of Tahe Oil Field were re-studied on the basis of combination of approaches including perspective of multiple reservoir-forming factors and their temporal and spatial dynamic configuration relationships, the discussion of typical reservoir profiles, thermal evolution of source rocks and consequent hydrocarbon generation history, paleo-structural evolution, hydrocarbon accumulation period and transport system, thus, a model of compound accumulation was established following an idea that paleo-structures and strike-slip faults together constrained reservoir formation and hydrocarbon generation as well as accumulation. Studies have shown that the main constrains for hydrocarbon accumulation in the study area includes the long-term hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from source rocks, multi-stage charging and accumulation and mixing transformation, paleo-structural controlling the migration and accumulation direction, vertical conduction and lateral adjustment by strike-slip faults, and multiple types of fractures and caves. The dynamic process of hydrocarbon accumulation has the characteristics of "vertical transportation, lateral accumulation, paleo-uplift controlling enrichment" in the early stage, and "in-situ hydrocarbon source, vertical migration and accumulation, and fault controlling enrichment" in the late stage. The mixed accumulation of oil and gas of different stages and different properties has created the present complex oil and gas appearance of the Ordovician strata. The heavy oil area was dominated by early accumulation, which was related to the high paleo-structures in the middle and late Caledonian periods, and the later charging was relatively weaker. The light oil area was dominated by late accumulation, mainly constrained by the vertical transport and short-range lateral adjustment of strike-slip faults. It is most developed in the NNE-trending fault zone and the intersection with the NNW-trending fault.

     

  • [1]
    顾忆, 万旸璐, 黄继文, 等. "大埋深、高压力"条件下塔里木盆地超深层油气勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(2): 157-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201902002.htm

    GU Yi, WAN Yanglu, HUANG Jiwen, et al. Prospects for ultra-deep oil and gas in the "deep burial and high pressure" Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(2): 157-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201902002.htm
    [2]
    何治亮, 毛洪斌, 周晓芬, 等. 塔里木多旋回盆地与复式油气系统[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2000, 21(3): 207-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200003004.htm

    HE Zhiliang, MAO Hongbin, ZHOU Xiaofeng, et al. Complex petroleum system and multicycle basin in Tarim[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2000, 21(3): 207-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200003004.htm
    [3]
    漆立新, 云露. 塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶发育特征与主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201001005.htm

    QI Lixin, YUN Lu. Development characteristics and main controlling factors of the Ordovician carbonate karst in Tahe oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201001005.htm
    [4]
    吕海涛, 丁文龙, 云露, 等. 塔河油田西南部地区中—下奥陶统碳酸盐岩储层缝洞发育特征与分布[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(4): 699-708. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200904015.htm

    LV Haitao, DING Wenlong, YUN Lu, et al. Lower-middle Ordovician carbonate reservoir karst-fracture characteristics in the southwest region of Tahe oilfield[J]. Geoscience, 2009, 23(4): 699-708. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200904015.htm
    [5]
    漆立新, 云露. 塔里木台盆区碳酸盐岩成藏模式与勘探实践[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 867-876. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202005024.htm

    QI Lixin, YUN Lu. Carbonate reservoir forming model and exploration in Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 867-876. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202005024.htm
    [6]
    顾忆, 黄继文, 邵志兵. 塔河油田奥陶系油气地球化学特征与油气运移[J]. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(6): 746-750. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200306019.htm

    GU Yi, HUANG Jiwen, SHAO Zhibing. Petroleum geochemistry and hydrocarbon migration in Tahe oilfield of the Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2003, 25(6): 746-750. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200306019.htm
    [7]
    李坤, 赵锡奎, 张小兵, 等. 塔里木盆地阿克库勒凸起油气输导体系类型与演化[J]. 地质科学, 2007, 42(4): 766-778. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200704012.htm

    LI Kun, ZHAO Xikui, ZHANG Xiaobing, et al. Hydrocarbon migration pathway system types and evolution in the Akekule rise, Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2007, 42(4): 766-778. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200704012.htm
    [8]
    吕海涛, 丁勇, 耿锋. 塔里木盆地奥陶系油气成藏规律与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(6): 798-805. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201406009.htm

    LÜ Haitao, DING Yong, GENG Feng. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns and favorable exploration areas of the Ordovician in Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(6): 798-805. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201406009.htm
    [9]
    余智超, 王志章, 魏荷花, 等. 塔河油田缝洞型油藏不同成因岩溶储集体表征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(6): 53-61.

    YU Zhichao, WANG Zhizhang, WEI Hehua, et al. Characterization of fracture-cave karst reservoirs with different genesis in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(6): 53-61.
    [10]
    马安来, 金之钧, 朱翠山. 塔里木盆地塔河油田奥陶系原油成熟度及裂解程度研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 313-323. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201702015.htm

    MA Anlai, JIN Zhijun, ZHU Cuishan. Maturity and oil-cracking of the Ordovician oils from Tahe oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(2): 313-323. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201702015.htm
    [11]
    翟晓先. 塔河大油田新领域的勘探实践[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(6): 751-761. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200606006.htm

    ZHAI Xiaoxian. Exploration practices in frontiers of Tahe oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(6): 751-761. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200606006.htm
    [12]
    何登发, 李德生, 童晓光, 等. 多期叠加盆地古隆起控油规律[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(4): 475-488. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200804002.htm

    HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, TONG Xiaoguang, et al. Accumulation and distribution of oil and gas controlled by paleo-uplift in poly-history superimposed basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(4): 475-488. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200804002.htm
    [13]
    顾忆, 黄继文, 贾存善, 等. 塔里木盆地海相油气成藏研究进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202001003.htm

    GU Yi, HUANG Jiwen, JIA Cunshan, et al. Research progress on marine oil and gas accumulation in Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202001003.htm
    [14]
    云露, 翟晓先. 塔里木盆地塔深1井寒武系储层与成藏特征探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(6): 726-732. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200806006.htm

    YUN Lu, ZHAI Xiaoxian. Discussion on characteristics of the Cambrian reservoirs and hydrocarbon accumulation in well Tashen-1, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(6): 726-732. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200806006.htm
    [15]
    庞雄奇, 陈君青, 李素梅, 等. 塔里木盆地特大型海相油田原油来源: 来自深部低TOC烃源岩的证据与相对贡献评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(1): 23-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201801003.htm

    PANG Xiongqi, CHEN Junqing, LI Sumei, et al. Crude oil sources of giant marine oilfield in Basin: evidences and relative contribution evaluation of deep present-day low-TOC source rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(1): 23-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201801003.htm
    [16]
    付小东, 秦建中, 姚根顺, 等. 两种温压体系下烃源岩生烃演化特征对比及其深层油气地质意义[J]. 地球化学, 2017, 46(3): 262-275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201703006.htm

    FU Xiaodong, QIN Jianzhong, YAO Genshun, et al. The comparison of hydrocarbon generation and evolution characteristics between two temperature-pressure simulation systems and its geological significance for deep reservoir exploration[J]. Geochimica, 2017, 46(3): 262-275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201703006.htm
    [17]
    郑伦举, 秦建中, 何生, 等. 地层孔隙热压生排烃模拟实验初步研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2009, 31(3): 296-302.

    ZHENG Lunju, QIN Jianzhong, HE Sheng, et al. Preliminary study of formation porosity thermocompression simulation experiment of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009, 31(3): 296-302.
    [18]
    殷和平, 钱一雄, 陈强路, 等. 流体包裹体主要成分及谱学特征研究: 以塔河油区下奥陶统储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2009, 31(3): 282-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200903016.htm

    YIN Heping, QIAN Yixiong, CHEN Qianglu, et al. Approaching to chemical composition and application of Raman spectrum of fluid inclusion: taking the Lower Ordovician reservoirs in Tahe as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009, 31(3): 282-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200903016.htm
    [19]
    饶丹, 秦建中, 许锦, 等. 塔河油田奥陶系油藏成藏期次研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(1): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201401015.htm

    RAO Dan, QIN Jianzhong, XU Jin, et al. Accumulation periods of Ordovician reservoirs in Tahe oil field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(1): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201401015.htm
    [20]
    陈红汉, 吴悠, 丰勇, 等. 塔河油田奥陶系油气成藏期次及年代学[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(6): 806-819. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201406010.htm

    CHEN Honghan, WU You, FENG Yong, et al. Timing and chronology of hydrocarbon charging in the Ordovician of Tahe oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(6): 806-819. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201406010.htm
    [21]
    王铁冠, 王春江, 何发岐, 等. 塔河油田奥陶系油藏两期成藏原油充注比率测算方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 2004, 26(1): 74-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200401014.htm

    WANG Tieguan, WANG Chunjiang, HE Faqi, et al. Determination of double filling ratio of mixed crude oils in the Ordovician oil reservoir, Tahe oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2004, 26(1): 74-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200401014.htm
    [22]
    邓尚, 李慧莉, 张仲培, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北及邻区主干走滑断裂带差异活动特征及其与油气富集的关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 878-888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201805004.htm

    DENG Shang, LI Huili, ZHANG Zhongpei, et al. Characteristics of differential activities in major strike-slip fault zones and their control on hydrocarbon enrichment in Shunbei area and its surroundings, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(5): 878-888. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201805004.htm
    [23]
    李宗杰, 王勤聪. 塔河油田奥陶系古岩溶洞穴识别及预测[J]. 新疆地质, 2003, 21(2): 181-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI200302007.htm

    LI Zongjie, WANG Qincong. Ordovician fossil karst cave reservoir recognition maker and prediction in Tahe oil field[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2003, 21(2): 181-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI200302007.htm
    [24]
    鲁新便, 蔡忠贤. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏古溶洞系统与油气开发: 以塔河碳酸盐岩溶洞型油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(1): 22-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201001007.htm

    LU Xinbian, CAI Zhongxian. A study of the paleo-cavern system in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs and oil/gas development: taking the reservoirs in Tahe oilfield as an example[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(1): 22-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201001007.htm
    [25]
    蔡忠贤, 刘永立, 刘群. 塔河油田中下奥陶统顶面岩溶古水系对接现象及其意义[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(2): 273-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201002011.htm

    CAI Zhongxian, LIU Yongli, LIU Qun. The appearance and significance of palaeo-drainage systems connection in the top of Lower-Middle Ordovician in Tahe oilfield[J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(2): 273-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201002011.htm
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 罗明霞,曹自成,徐勤琪,刘永立,尚凯. 塔里木盆地塔河油田塔深5井震旦系原油地球化学特征及地质意义. 地质科技通报. 2024(01): 135-149 .
    2. 张驰,储呈林,徐勤琪,孙雅雄,贾存善,魏华动. 塔里木盆地阿克库勒凸起东南斜坡走滑断裂构造特征及油气地质意义. 地质学报. 2024(02): 481-493 .
    3. 徐勤琪,张黎,李斌,钟笠,张欣,周浩栋. 塔河油田下寒武统烃源岩生排烃史差异演化及成藏效应. 特种油气藏. 2024(01): 20-30 .
    4. 黄亚浩,汪如军,文志刚,张银涛,崔仕提,李梦勤,王彭,何涛华. 塔里木盆地富满油田深层—超深层油气成藏过程. 石油学报. 2024(06): 947-960 .
    5. 马冬晨,王文军,张婷,李立武,王作栋,钱宇,敖添,符印,王丹,贾星亮. 正构烷烃单体碳同位素组成差异分析——以塔河油田奥陶系原油为例. 沉积学报. 2024(04): 1411-1421 .
    6. 李斌,钟笠,吕海涛,杨素举,徐勤琪,张鑫,郑斌嵩. 叠合盆地深层海相油气差异富集历史的动态模拟——以塔河油田下古生界含油气系统为例. 石油勘探与开发. 2024(05): 1053-1066 .
    7. 乔俊程,常少英,曾溅辉,曹鹏,董科良,王孟修,杨冀宁,刘亚洲,隆辉,安廷,杨睿,文林. 塔里木盆地北部富满地区超深层走滑断裂带碳酸盐岩油气差异成藏成因探讨. 石油与天然气地质. 2024(05): 1226-1246 .
    8. LI Bin,ZHONG Li,LYU Haitao,YANG Suju,XU Qinqi,ZHANG Xin,ZHENG Binsong. Dynamic simulation of differential accumulation history of deep marine oil and gas in superimposed basin: A case study of Lower Paleozoic petroleum system of Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2024(05): 1217-1231 .
    9. 李海英,韩俊,陈平,李媛,卜旭强. 塔里木盆地顺北4号走滑断裂带变形特征及有利区评价. 新疆石油地质. 2023(02): 127-135 .
    10. 谢才铸,傅恒,朱梦琦,王文博,熊锐,王荣刚,周杨,张智南,刘鑫北. 塔里木盆地塔河地区石炭系卡拉沙依组层序格架内沉积模式. 地层学杂志. 2023(01): 34-48 .
    11. 文欢,张长建,马海陇. 叠前AVO反演技术在塔河油田三种类型油气藏流体识别中的适用性分析. 石油地质与工程. 2023(02): 1-7 .
    12. 李清瑶,高永进,杨有星,张远银,刘晓峰,孙智超,陈夷,苗苗青. 塔里木盆地西北部志留系柯坪塔格组沉积体系演化特征. 断块油气田. 2023(04): 639-647 .
    13. 汪彦,高济元,杨德彬,张恒,蔡忠贤,何新明,金燕林,刘遥,王明. 海西早期大型树枝状岩溶暗河发育条件与地质模式——以塔里木盆地塔河油田B94井区为例. 断块油气田. 2023(05): 758-769 .
    14. 马勇,黎雨航,张卫峰,李红斌,王谦,白梅梅,赖锦. 基于成像测井的塔河油田奥陶系鹰山组中深层碳酸盐岩优质储集层预测. 地球物理学进展. 2023(06): 2525-2539 .
    15. 叶成,任涛,尹泽斌,李成,白杨. 准噶尔南缘冲断带破碎地层井壁稳定性机理. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 95-103 .
    16. 张长建,杨德彬,吕艳萍,张娟,李杰,丁立明. 塔河油田海西运动早期岩溶水系统划分及特征. 新疆石油地质. 2023(06): 646-656 .
    17. 朱泽栋,臧晓琳,康弘男,张雪峰,韩冬,孔为,王震. 中非多赛奥盆地白垩系油气成藏特征. 辽宁化工. 2022(04): 546-548+552 .
    18. 汪洋,张哨楠,刘永立. 塔里木盆地塔河油田走滑断裂活动对油气成藏的控制作用——以托甫39断裂带为例. 石油实验地质. 2022(03): 394-401 . 本站查看
    19. 李丹杨. XX油田中浅层油气成藏主控因素分析. 石化技术. 2022(08): 128-130 .
    20. 何治亮,陆建林,林娟华,金晓辉,漆立新,徐旭辉,黄仁春,王毅. 中国海相盆地原型-改造分析与油气有序聚集模式. 地学前缘. 2022(06): 60-72 .
    21. 谢才铸,傅恒,朱梦琦,王文博. 塔河桑塔木地区石炭系卡拉沙依组层序地层及砂体发育特征. 东北石油大学学报. 2022(04): 1-11+131 .
    22. 张长建,吕艳萍,张振哲. 塔里木盆地塔河油田西部斜坡区中下奥陶统古岩溶洞穴发育特征. 石油实验地质. 2022(06): 1008-1017+1047 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(10)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-032024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-020255075100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 20.6 %FULLTEXT: 20.6 %META: 72.2 %META: 72.2 %PDF: 7.3 %PDF: 7.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.7 %其他: 4.7 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Turkey: 0.1 %Turkey: 0.1 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %东营: 0.3 %东营: 0.3 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %乌鲁木齐: 1.7 %乌鲁木齐: 1.7 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %北京: 4.8 %北京: 4.8 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %台州: 2.5 %台州: 2.5 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吐鲁番地区: 0.1 %吐鲁番地区: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %喀什地区: 0.1 %喀什地区: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %城南: 0.1 %城南: 0.1 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %巴中: 0.3 %巴中: 0.3 %巴音郭楞: 0.7 %巴音郭楞: 0.7 %巴音郭楞蒙古自治州: 0.2 %巴音郭楞蒙古自治州: 0.2 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 3.0 %张家口: 3.0 %忻州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %无锡: 2.8 %无锡: 2.8 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %池州: 0.1 %池州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.7 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.7 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 1.2 %湖州: 1.2 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %焦作: 0.1 %焦作: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石河子: 0.1 %石河子: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.1 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.1 %美国: 0.1 %美国: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 41.3 %芒廷维尤: 41.3 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %茂名: 0.1 %茂名: 0.1 %莫斯科: 1.2 %莫斯科: 1.2 %萨斯卡通: 0.1 %萨斯卡通: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衢州: 1.8 %衢州: 1.8 %西宁: 12.0 %西宁: 12.0 %西安: 0.8 %西安: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %费利蒙: 0.1 %费利蒙: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 1.4 %运城: 1.4 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %都柏林: 0.1 %都柏林: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.1 %阿克苏地区: 0.1 %阿克苏地区: 0.1 %阿拉善盟: 0.2 %阿拉善盟: 0.2 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaIndiaNahantRussian FederationTurkeyUnited States[]三门峡上海东莞东营临汾丽水乌鲁木齐克拉玛依兰州北京南京南通台州合肥吐鲁番地区呼和浩特喀什地区嘉兴城南大庆天津宁波安康密蘇里城巴中巴音郭楞巴音郭楞蒙古自治州常州广州廊坊张家口忻州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉池州沈阳沧州法尔肯施泰因洛阳济南海口深圳温州湖州漯河焦作盘锦石家庄石河子秦皇岛罗奥尔凯埃美国芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名莫斯科萨斯卡通衡水衢州西宁西安贵阳费利蒙达州运城遵义邯郸郑州都柏林鄂州重庆金华长春长沙长治阿什本阿克苏地区阿拉善盟青岛香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1112) PDF downloads(114) Cited by(32)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return