Advanced Search
Volume 45 Issue 2
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2023  >  45(2): 378-384
LIU Yang, ZHANG Gong, QIN Yingyao, ZHANG Jiacheng, LI Sen. Effects of magnetic field intensity and gradient on measurement results of core nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 378-384. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302378
Citation: LIU Yang, ZHANG Gong, QIN Yingyao, ZHANG Jiacheng, LI Sen. Effects of magnetic field intensity and gradient on measurement results of core nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 378-384. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302378
shu

Effects of magnetic field intensity and gradient on measurement results of core nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302378

  • Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources of Ministryof Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China

  • Received Date: 2022-07-19
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-02-01
  • Publish Date: 2023-03-28
    Abstract
  • Nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) logging instruments generally measure the NMR signal of reservoir fluid in a uniform field with a resonance frequency of 2 MHz or a gradient field with a resonance frequency of less than 1 MHz. For laboratory NMR core analyzers, in addition to the commonly used 2 MHz, the resonance frequency of 12 MHz or 21 MHz is often used for experimental measurement of tight reservoirs such as shale. In order to determine the effects of magnetic field intensity and gradient on the NMR measurement results, the sensitivity of the magnetic field intensity and gradient of the core experiments of glutenite and shale cores under water-saturatedstate was systematically studied, and the relationship between the T2 spectrum shape, position, nuclear magnetic porosity, T2 geometric mean and the magnetic field intensity and gradient of different rock samples was analyzed. The experimental results show that under the uniform field, glutenite samples are very sensitive to the change of magnetic field intensity, while shale samples are less sensitive. The existence of external gradient field will make the short relaxation information of glutenite and shale missing, resulting in that the NMR signal cannot be measured completely. When the NMR core experiment is used to calibrate the interpretation parameters of NMR logging, the experimental measurement results must be corrected if there is a large difference in the magnetic field intensity or gradient between the laboratory NMR core analyzer and the NMR logging instrument.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(24)
  • [1]
    王伟, 赵延伟, 毛锐, 等. 页岩油储层核磁有效孔隙度起算时间的确定: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 550-557. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903011.htm

    WANG Wei, ZHAO Yanwei, MAO Rui, et al. Determination of the starting time for measurement of NMR effective porosity in shale oil reservoir: a case study of the Permian Lucaogou shale oil reservoir, Jimusaer Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 550-557. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903011.htm
    [2]
    彭石林, 胡以良, 刘崇汉. 岩心核磁共振实验分析与常规物性测量对比[J]. 测井技术, 1998, 22(S1): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJS8S1.001.htm

    PENG Shilin, HU Yiliang, LIU Chonghan. Comparison between core NMR experimental analysis and conventional physical property measurement[J]. Well Logging Technology, 1998, 22(S1): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJS8S1.001.htm
    [3]
    邓克俊. 核磁共振测井理论及应用[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2010.

    DENG Kejun. Nuclear magnetic resonance logging theory and application[M]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2010.
    [4]
    ANAND V, ALI M R, AL-ADANI N, et al. New generation NMR tool for robust, continuous T1 and T2 measurements[C]//Proceedings of SPWLA 201656th Annual Logging Symposium. Long Beach: SPWLA, 2015.
    [5]
    王俊明, 邵维志, 韩成, 等. MRIL-Prime核磁共振测井仪[J]. 石油仪器, 2002, 16(6): 18-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9134.2002.06.007

    WANG Junming, SHAO Weizhi, HAN Cheng, et al. MRIL-Prime nuclear magnetic resonant image logging tool[J]. Petroleum Instruments, 2002, 16(6): 18-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9134.2002.06.007
    [6]
    邰子伟, 刘德叶, 黎明华. 三种核磁共振测井仪器的比较[J]. 核电子学与探测技术, 2006, 26(6): 1049-1051. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2006.06.095

    TAI Ziwei, LIU Deye, LI Minghua. The comparison for three type of NMR logging tool[J]. Nuclear Electronics & Detection Technology, 2006, 26(6): 1049-1051. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2006.06.095
    [7]
    孙中良, 李志明, 申宝剑, 等. 核磁共振技术在页岩油气储层评价中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 930-940. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205930

    SUN Zhongliang, LI Zhiming, SHEN Baojian, et al. NMR technology in reservoir evaluation for shale oil and gas[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 930-940. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205930
    [8]
    江昀, 许国庆, 石阳, 等. 致密岩心带压渗吸规律实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 144-153. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101144

    JIANG Yun, XU Guoqing, SHI Yang, et al. Forced imbibition in tight glutenite cores[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 144-153. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101144
    [9]
    谢然红, 肖立志, 刘天定. 原油的核磁共振弛豫特性[J]. 西南石油大学学报, 2007, 29(5): 21-24. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2007.05.006

    XIE Ranhong, XIAO Lizhi, LIU Tianding. NMR relaxation properties of crude oils[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2007, 29(5): 21-24. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2007.05.006
    [10]
    KAUSIK R, FELLAH K, FENG L, et al. High- and low-field NMR relaxometry and diffusometry of the Bakken petroleum system[J]. Petrophysics, 2017, 58(4): 341-351. http://www.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=ef053bfa5ff1c09e22fe287680dcc029
    [11]
    TROMP R R, PEL L. NMR T1 dispersion of crude oils from 10 kHz to 20 MHz[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2021, 325: 106949. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.106949
    [12]
    KORB J P. Nuclear magnetic relaxation of liquids in porous media[J]. New Journal of Physics, 2011, 13(3): 035016. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/035016
    [13]
    CUI Yingzhi, SHIKHOV I, LI Rupeng, et al. A numerical study of field intensity and clay morphology impact on NMR transverse relaxation in glutenites[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 202: 108521. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410521001807
    [14]
    覃莹瑶, 张宫, 张嘉伟, 等. 磁场强度对T2-T1二维核磁共振实验的影响研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(5): 2082-2089. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ202105030.htm

    QIN Yingyao, ZHANG Gong, ZHANG Jiawei, et al. Study on the influence of magnetic field intensity on T2-T1 two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance experiment[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(5): 2082-2089. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ202105030.htm
    [15]
    梁灿, 肖立志, 周灿灿, 等. 岩石润湿性的核磁共振表征方法与初步实验结果[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(11): 4472-4481. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201911039.htm

    LIANG Can, XIAO Lizhi, ZHOU Cancan, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance characterizes rock wettability: preliminary experimental results[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(11): 4472-4481. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201911039.htm
    [16]
    余玥, 孙一迪, 高睿, 等. 基于T2截止值确定致密岩心表面弛豫率[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 342-349. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202342

    YU Yue, SUN Yidi, GAO Rui, et al. Determination of surface relaxivity for tight glutenite cores based on T2 cut-off value[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2): 342-349. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202342
    [17]
    MCDONALD P J, KORB J P, MITCHELL J, et al. Surface relaxation and chemical exchange in hydrating cement pastes: a two-dimensional NMR relaxation study[J]. Physical Review E, 2005, 72(1): 011409. http://www.xueshufan.com/publication/2134673969
    [18]
    GODEFROY S, KORB J P, FLEURY M, et al. Surface nuclear magnetic relaxation and dynamics of water and oil in macroporous media[J]. Physical Review E, 2001, 64(2): 021605. http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PLEEE8000064000002021605000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes
    [19]
    COATES G, 肖立志, PRAMMER M. 核磁共振测井原理与应用[M]. 孟繁莹, 译. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007.

    COATES G, XIAO Lizhi, PRAMMER M. Principles and applications of NMR logging[M]. MENG Fanying, trans. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2007.
    [20]
    张宫, 何宗斌, 曹文倩, 等. 回波间隔对核磁共振表观孔隙度的影响及矫正方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37(2): 172-181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PPXZ202002005.htm

    ZHANG Gong, HE Zongbin, CAO Wenqian, et al. Effects of echo time on NMR apparent porosity and correction methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2020, 37(2): 172-181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PPXZ202002005.htm
    [21]
    毛克宇. 火成岩核磁共振数值模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(4): 1755-1762. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201504031.htm

    MAO Keyu. Analysis on influence factors based on NMR simulation in igneous rocks[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(4): 1755-1762. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201504031.htm
    [22]
    国家能源局. SY/T 6490-2014, 岩样核磁共振参数实验室测量规范[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2015.

    National Energy Administration. SY/T 6490-2014, Specification for measurement of rock NMR parameter in laboratory[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2015.
    [23]
    刘欢, 徐锦绣, 郑炀, 等. 渤海J油田储层核磁共振测井孔隙度影响因素分析及校正[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37(3): 370-380. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PPXZ202003011.htm

    LIU Huan, XU Jinxiu, ZHENG Yang, et al. Factors affecting and correction methods for porosity measured by NMR logging in the J oilfield of Bohai Bay[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2020, 37(3): 370-380. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PPXZ202003011.htm
    [24]
    张宫, 冯庆付, 武宏亮, 等. 基于核磁T2谱对数均值差异的碳酸盐岩气水识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1243-1249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201708012.htm

    ZHANG Gong, FENG Qingfu, WU Hongliang, et al. Gas-water identification of carbonate reservoir based on log mean difference of T2 spectrum[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(8): 1243-1249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201708012.htm
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(5)

    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (493) PDF downloads(58) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return