Stress sensitivity characteristics and influencing factors of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage

LI Meng; ZHENG Dewen; QIU Xiaosong; LIU Mancang

doi:10.11781/sysydz202302385

Volume 45 Issue 2

Mar. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2023 > 45(2): 385-392

LI Meng, ZHENG Dewen, QIU Xiaosong, LIU Mancang. Stress sensitivity characteristics and influencing factors of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 385-392. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302385

Citation:

LI Meng, ZHENG Dewen, QIU Xiaosong, LIU Mancang. Stress sensitivity characteristics and influencing factors of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 385-392. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302385

Citation:

PDF( 1081 KB)

Stress sensitivity characteristics and influencing factors of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302385

LI Meng^{1, 2
,},
ZHENG Dewen^{1, 2},
QIU Xiaosong^{1, 2},
LIU Mancang^{1, 2}

1.
Underground Oil and Gas Storage Research Center of Research Instituteof Petroleum Exploration and Development, CNPC, Beijing 100086, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Underground Oil and Gas Storage Engineering, CNPC, Langfang, Hebei 065007, China

Received Date: 2022-10-09
Rev Recd Date: 2023-01-16
Publish Date: 2023-03-28

Abstract

Abstract

The storage capacity and productivity of gas storage are affected by many factors, among which porosity and permeability are the main factors. To reveal the variation characteristics of porosity and permeability of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage, five different types of sandstone samples were collected from the S gas storage in the Liaohe Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, and stress sensibility comparative experiments were carried out. The results show that the porosity and permeability decrease with the increase of effective stress, which affects the storage capacity and productivity of the gas storage. The porosity and permeability damage rate can be used to characterize the damage degree of the storage capacity and productivity. A damage factor characterizing storage capacity and productivity was proposed for the first time, which can be used to quantitatively evaluate storage capacity and productivity of gas storage under alternating load conditions. The porosity and permeability damage rate of the S gas storage increase linearly with the increase of effective stress. The porosity stress damage rate of the argillaceous siltstone reservoir is the largest, and the porosity stress damage rate of the medium-grained sandstone reservoir is the lowest. The argillaceous siltstone reservoir also has the largest permeability damage rate and its own permeability is too low, so it contributes less during emergency supply assurance. The medium-grained sandstone reservoir has the smallest permeability damage rate, and it has little influence on the capacity of peak regulating and supply assurance. Through this study, the quantified damage degree of stress to gas storage capacity was determined. According to the damage rate of different types of reservoirs, the storage capacity and productivity of gas storage can be maximized by optimizing the operation condition of gas storage reasonably.
- underground gas storage,
- overburden pressure,
- porosity,
- permeability,
- stress sensitivity

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	阳小平, 程林松, 何学良, 等. 地下储气库多周期运行注采气能力预测方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(4): 96-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201304020.htm YANG Xiaoping, CHENG Linsong, HE Xueliang, et al. A prediction method for multi-stage injection and recovery capacity of underground gas storage[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(4): 96-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201304020.htm
[2]	李相臣, 康毅力, 罗平亚. 煤层气储层变形机理及对渗流能力的影响研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2009, 18(3): 99-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2009.03.028 LI Xiangchen, KANG Yili, LUO Pingya. Rock deformation mechanisms and its influence on poecolation ability for CBM reservoirs[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2009, 18(3): 99-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2009.03.028
[3]	贾文瑞, 李福垲, 肖敬修. 低渗透油田开发部署中几个问题的研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(4): 47-51. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.1995.04.017 JIA Wenrui, LI Fukai, XIAO Jingxiu. A study on some issues of development disposition of a low permeability oil field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1995, 22(4): 47-51. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.1995.04.017
[4]	卢家亭, 李闽. 低渗砂岩渗透率应力敏感性实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3): 339-341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2007.03.004 LU Jiating, LI Min. Experimental research on permeability sensitivity of low-permeability sand rock[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007, 18(3): 339-341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2007.03.004
[5]	伍向阳, 陈祖安, 孙德明, 等. 静水压力下砂岩孔隙度变化实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 1995, 38(S1): 275-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX5S1.027.htm WU Xiangyang, CHEN Zu'an, SUN Deming, et al. An experimental study of changes of porosity of sandstones with pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1995, 38(S1): 275-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX5S1.027.htm
[6]	游利军, 孟森, 康毅力, 等. 气藏型储气库储层损害机理与保护技术对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 395-403. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103015.htm YOU Lijun, MENG Sen, KANG Yili, et al. Formation damage mechanism and protection measures for gas field storage[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 395-403. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103015.htm
[7]	曹耐, 雷刚. 致密储集层加压-卸压过程应力敏感性[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 132-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201901013.htm CAO Nai, LEI Gang. Stress sensitivity of tight reservoirs during pressure loading and unloading process[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1): 132-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201901013.htm
[8]	张广权, 范照伟, 曾大乾, 等. 交变载荷下储气库储层与盖层损伤规律[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(6): 769-774. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202106011.htm ZHANG Guangquan, FAN Zhaowei, ZENG Daqian, et al. Damage law of reservoir and cap rock of gas storage under alternating load[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2021, 28(6): 769-774. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202106011.htm
[9]	李继强, 赵冠群, 戚志林, 等. 气藏型储气库多周期注采储集层应力敏感效应[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4): 835-842. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104018.htm LI Jiqiang, ZHAO Guanqun, QI Zhilin, et al. Stress sensitivity of formation during multi-cycle gas injection and production in an underground gas storage rebuilt from gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4): 835-842. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104018.htm
[10]	孔茜, 王环玲, 徐卫亚. 循环加卸载作用下砂岩孔隙度与渗透率演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(10): 1893-1900. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201510024.htm KONG Qian, WANG Huanling, XU Weiya. Experimental study on permeability and porosity evolution of sandstone under cyclic loading and unloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(10): 1893-1900. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201510024.htm
[11]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 29172-2012, 岩心分析方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 29172-2012, Practices for core analysis[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012.
[12]	国家能源局. SY/T 6385-2016, 覆压下岩石孔隙度和渗透率的测定方法[S]. 东营: 胜利石油管理局地质科学研究院, 1999. National Energy Administration. SY/T 6385-2016, Porosity and permeability measurement under overburden pressure[S]. Dongying: Institute of Geological Sciences, Shengli Petroleum Administration, 1999.
[13]	杨巍, 薛莲花, 唐俊, 等. 页岩孔隙度测量实验方法分析与评价[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(6): 1258-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201506018.htm YANG Wei, XUE LianHua, TANG Jun, et al. Analysis and evaluation of different measuring methods for shale porosity[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(6): 1258-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201506018.htm
[14]	钟高润, 张小莉, 杜江民, 等. 致密砂岩储层应力敏感性实验研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31(3): 1300-1306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201603050.htm ZHONG Gaorun, ZHANG Xiaoli, DU Jiangmin, et al. Experiment of the stress sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2016, 31(3): 1300-1306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201603050.htm
[15]	孟召平, 侯泉林. 煤储层应力敏感性及影响因素的试验分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(3): 430-437. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201203014.htm MENG Zhaoping, HOU Quanlin. Experimental research on stress sensitivity of coal reservoir and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(3): 430-437. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201203014.htm
[16]	陈术源, 秦勇, 申建, 等. 高阶煤渗透率温度应力敏感性试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(9): 1845-1851. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201409011.htm CHEN Shuyuan, QIN Yong, SHEN Jian, et al. Temperature-stress sensitivity of high-rank coal permeability[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(9): 1845-1851. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201409011.htm

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(4) / Tables(5)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (386) PDF downloads(44)

Stress sensitivity characteristics and influencing factors of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302385

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Stress sensitivity characteristics and influencing factors of different types of sandstone reservoirs in gas storage

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302385

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content